![]() |
|
|
#276 | |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#277 | |
|
Bemusing Prompter
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California
74 Posts |
To make sleuthing easier, I've arranged the results returned between 7:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. UTC on August 23, 2008:
Quote:
Last fiddled with by ixfd64 on 2008-09-02 at 19:59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#278 |
|
"Lucan"
Dec 2006
England
2×3×13×83 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#279 | |
|
Dec 2003
23×33 Posts |
Quote:
I wasn't the only one to be fooled by the decoy.Code:
Verified LL2648A8AD8385FF48 by "ATH" on 2008-09-02 Verified LL2648A8AD8385FF48 by "Jayson King" on 2008-09-02 Verified LL2648A8AD8385FF48 by "Sturle Sunde" on 2008-09-02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#280 |
|
"Lelio R Paula"
Aug 2008
Salvador-BA, Brazil
11012 Posts |
What are the odds of finding a M-prime in your 4th test?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#281 |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
102538 Posts |
The exact same as finding it on your first, or tenth, or millionth test. (like asking "after rolling 2 dice three times, what are the odds it will roll a 2 next time? 1/36, as always)
Well, now we know that the fake residue was definitely applied to something besides the real M45 (and that all three of those computers are stable). Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2008-09-02 at 21:10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#282 |
|
Mar 2006
13·37 Posts |
[Sep 2 11:39] Iteration: 32410000 / 32428427 [99.94%]. Per iteration time: 0.023 sec.
[Sep 2 11:43] Iteration: 32420000 / 32428427 [99.97%]. Per iteration time: 0.023 sec. [Sep 2 11:46] M32428427 is not prime. Res64: 2648A8AD8385FF48. Wd4: 241E7307,16551085,00000000 I know this will come as a shocker to most (probably not), but M32428427 is apparently not the number for which we seek. It's going to be one of the other dozen or so numbers. Just fyi. |
|
|
|
|
|
#283 | |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
2×3×293 Posts |
Quote:
Code:
17793667 66 D 0x60A331ED249105__ 04-Sep-06 17:03 phillipkwood pwoodlaptop 31618063 68 L 0x98AE571681AD70__ 04-Sep-06 17:10 whjelsma mbj 35533969 68 L 0x1B56C4AA4C5716__ 04-Sep-06 17:10 tangseng weak 28222451 69 L 0x60B3F790BFDBE0__ 04-Sep-06 17:22 philnelson pm26 28551353 69 L 0x15F76D65869BB1__ 04-Sep-06 17:24 S373561 CD88C8DB9 31170443 69 L 0x03817977DEC42A__ 04-Sep-06 17:29 S405624 ipt_lab 32582657 68 L 0x663C8660956654__ 04-Sep-06 17:33 curtisc wd-102--04l 17787467 66 D 0x5F4D90B6DF8B55__ 04-Sep-06 17:36 TempleU-CAS FL-SLE 34569637 69 L 0xDC7FAE962B7DF7__ 04-Sep-06 17:36 sitbon C015A9015 29225803 69 L 0xB6C80136DB7FED__ 04-Sep-06 17:40 mcobb a2-170.0 35500939 68 L 0xCE86BDB434FE70__ 04-Sep-06 17:41 rc 1 35607629 68 L 0xC9C6D29A7C6B35__ 04-Sep-06 17:42 computist 14976869 66 L 0x7AB64A4C5E7107__ 04-Sep-06 17:56 shaneamy Jason 17433547 66 D 0x310749641415DB__ 04-Sep-06 17:58 ebravick ursjail00b.1 LINIST I wonder though... What happened in those 7 minutes between 17:33 and 17:40? Was the 0 residue of M32582657 exposed for all to see? EDIT: Silly me. cleared.txt is only updated on the hour; so none of the results are viewable to the general public until 18:00. Unless I'm forgetting something again... Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2008-09-03 at 03:23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#284 | |
|
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48
110110111102 Posts |
Quote:
Maybe this would help... Does anyone know the true residue of M29225803? Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2008-09-03 at 02:55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#285 |
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22×3×641 Posts |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (New ?) Wagstaff/Mersenne related property | T.Rex | Wagstaff PRP Search | 6 | 2019-11-23 22:46 |
| Holy Speedup, Batman! | R.D. Silverman | NFSNET Discussion | 4 | 2008-10-02 01:28 |
| Holy Beaverpotamus, Batman! | ewmayer | Science & Technology | 4 | 2008-03-14 19:19 |
| holy tethered cow! new Mersenne prime? (M43-related) | ixfd64 | News | 265 | 2006-01-04 09:47 |
| Mersenne prime related shirts and other items | adpowers | Lounge | 40 | 2004-08-12 22:05 |