![]() |
|
|
#441 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Reserving Riesel Base 55 n=25k-40K All k's
|
|
|
|
|
|
#442 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
285210 Posts |
Riesel Base 60 complete n=25K-40K
9 primes found and proven (see list) - Results emailed - Base released 17630*60^25123-1 8236*60^26151-1 20314*60^27273-1 17614*60^29555-1 16186*60^29570-1 10063*60^32157-1 5461*60^33331-1 15556*60^34973-1 7331*60^38412-1 Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2009-10-17 at 06:22 |
|
|
|
|
|
#443 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
28AD16 Posts |
Thanks for the great progress Ian.
One thing you might consider doing for efficiency gains is sieving both Riesel and Sierp of the same base together if the # of k's remaining and the current search range are not too much different. Srsieve and sr2sieve can handle that. You can even start the two sides from a different n-range and still gain overall efficiency if the current search depth isn't too much different. For doing that, you'd just have to start them separately in srsieve before merging them together and continuing with sr2sieve. Base 60 would have been a pretty good one to do that on. Other bases that you could do that on in the future would be 42, 46, 55, 61, 70, and 75. Additionally, even though they are currently at different n-depths, bases 48 and 60 could also be sieved together in sr2sieve after starting each separately in srsieve from a different n-depth. That was part of the reason I was trying to get many of the higher bases on both sides up to n=25K. I was able to utilize that tact on just 2-3 of them but now the 2 sides are a little more synced up and it can be used on more of them. I just thought of it again now or would have mentioned it earlier. Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#444 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
Quote:
With just 10 in an n=5K range, unfortunately it looks a little unlikely that you'll get to < 300 k's remaining at n=50K. I've had the same thing happen with Sierp base 31. At n=10K, I thought I'd get to 900-1000 k's remaining at n=25K. It then began to look like ~1100, then 1100-1125. Now, as I near n=20K, it's looking more like it will be 1125-1150 will remain at n=25K. I was hoping to get to < than the 1123 k's remaining for Sierp base 19 at n=25K. I think it's going to be close but will probably come in just a little above that...still remarkable for a conjecture 8+ times as high! Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-10-17 at 21:40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#445 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Sierp Base 49 complete n=25K-40K
2 primes found and proven - Results attached - Base released 2488*49^29737+1 186*49^33764+1 Also, reserving Sierp base 75 n=25K-40K and Riesel Base 103 n=10K-40K Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#446 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Sierp Base 53 complete n=25K-40K
3 Primes found and proven - Results emailed - Base released 562*53^30802+1 968*53^31503+1 1448*53^35827+1 Reserving Riesel Base 53 (all k's) from n=25K-40K Reserving Riesel Base 46 (all k's) from n=25K-40K |
|
|
|
|
|
#447 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
1011001001002 Posts |
Riesel Base 39
Tested from n=7K-10K. 849 primes found (see attached file) 5332 k's remaining + the 1 I am not testing = 5333 k's left Releasing the base for now. I'll be back. Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2014-09-02 at 09:16 |
|
|
|
|
|
#448 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#449 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22×23×31 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#450 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
101000101011012 Posts |
Quote:
The only time they might not be shown is if it says "to be shown later" or "testing just started" but that is not the case for any bases < 40. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#451 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
28AD16 Posts |
After an Email exchange with Ian, I realized that what I said here wasn't quite clear. To be more clear:
All k's that are remaining are shown on the web pages for all bases IF THOSE K'S HAVE BEEN ALREADY TESTED. Obviously there are billions of k's still remaining on bases 3, 7, 15 that are NOT shown as remaining because they have NOT been tested yet. It would not be reasonable (or even possible?) to show them all. The same thing applies to any base where testing has just started, not started but I want to show other info. about the base, or where I only know the # of k's remaining but not the specific k's. (caps for emphasis, not yelling) Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2009-10-20 at 15:33 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bases 6-32 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 1398 | 2021-08-06 12:49 |
| Riesel base 3 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 1108 | 2021-08-04 18:49 |
| Bases 251-500 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 2305 | 2021-08-04 15:09 |
| Bases 501-1030 reservations/statuses/primes | KEP | Conjectures 'R Us | 3920 | 2021-08-04 14:39 |
| Bases 101-250 reservations/statuses/primes | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 908 | 2021-08-01 07:48 |