![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
May 2004
4748 Posts |
See the entry "failure function" in the maths encyclopedia of PlanetMath.org.
The relevant paper "A Theorem a la Ramanujan" is also on PM. A.K.Devaraj
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Feb 2007
24×33 Posts |
Does not seem universally accepted...
BTW, \in must of course go inside the $...$ !! Last fiddled with by m_f_h on 2008-04-25 at 06:38 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA
22·3·641 Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
However, selecting view style "TeX source" gets one to a readable entry. Is there any way to change that view style default? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Nov 2003
22×5×373 Posts |
Quote:
Indeed, it "isn't even wrong". As written: The function psi is undefined, the variable x is used to mean two different things in two different places, and the conclusion is meaningless since psi(x) is undefined. And if psi(x) is a polynomial, then the result is false. Finally, the post fails to give a definition of N. There is no universal definition. Sometimes it means Z+, and other times it means {0, Z+}. Finding polynomial functions that are composite and positive for every element in their domain is *trivial*. Take any polynomial with no real roots and non-zero content. The OP is just another clueless crank. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Nov 2003
22·5·373 Posts |
I should have added: polynomial with positive coefficients.
|
|
|
|