mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2003-08-23, 19:39   #1
arrruken
 
Aug 2003

2 Posts
Default what does it all mean

Im new to the actual search, but used prime95 for benchmarking. well ive had it running week or so now and prime95 may have found something. It was factoring m33493157 to 2^68 and finished and found no factor. then it did the self test and it passed. Now it is doing P-1 factoring of the same number, chance of finding a factor at 5% so it says. Does this mean that this number may be a prime, and how many other ways is it gonna use before i know. its on stage 1, whatever that means, and its taking an awefully long time even for my overclocked athlon beast.
arrruken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-23, 21:49   #2
Dresdenboy
 
Dresdenboy's Avatar
 
Apr 2003
Berlin, Germany

16916 Posts
Default

To find out more on the subject visit http://www.mersenne.org/

The math pages will give a clue, what it does.

As long as you do stage 1 or 2 give it more memory (Options->CPU). For such large exponents a lot of memory will speed it up. Just try with 160, 200 or more MB assigned memory. And don't worry - it's just needed for these 2 stages. After they have finished it will need much less (maybe 10 with your exponent).
Dresdenboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-24, 00:01   #3
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

22×3×641 Posts
Default Re: what does it all mean

Quote:
Originally Posted by arrruken
its taking an awefully long time even for my overclocked athlon beast.
Your Athlon beast has met a worthy match; it's working on a very large number. M33493157 is far, far larger than any prime number ever found by what used to be called "supercomputers" only a few years ago.

Just have patience. :)
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-24, 05:50   #4
arrruken
 
Aug 2003

2 Posts
Default

i already gave the program 256 megs, maybe ill give it 512, i still dont notice a difference, and i only turn it off during games.
arrruken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-24, 08:51   #5
bayanne
 
bayanne's Avatar
 
"Tony Gott"
Aug 2002
Yell, Shetland, UK

22·83 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arrruken
i already gave the program 256 megs, maybe ill give it 512, i still dont notice a difference, and i only turn it off during games.
If you change the memory settings in the middle of a p-1 test, then it will restart the whole test again.
The more memory that you allocate then the more slowly the test will take.
Athlons are not as good at factoring as P4 because they do not use SSE2.
bayanne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-24, 09:00   #6
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

11110000011002 Posts
Default

arrruken,

As long as you are in stage 1 of P-1 factoring, you won't see any difference in use of memory when you change the allocation, because stage 1 uses only a small amount (like 10 meg), regardless of what you allocate. Only when the P-1 factoring proceeds to its stage 2 will it use the extra memory you've allocated.

There is another type of factoring called ECM (which your system will not be doing unless you specifically set up the instructions for that), which also has two stages, like P-1 factoring. When ECM factoring is in progress, both stage 1 and stage 2 of the ECM will use the extra allocated memory you specified. But that won't happen unless you set it up (and you don't need to).

Have patience. :)
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-25, 22:33   #7
flava
 
flava's Avatar
 
Feb 2003

2×59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bayanne
Quote:
Originally Posted by arrruken
i already gave the program 256 megs, maybe ill give it 512, i still dont notice a difference, and i only turn it off during games.
If you change the memory settings in the middle of a p-1 test, then it will restart the whole test again.
The more memory that you allocate then the more slowly the test will take.
Athlons are not as good at factoring as P4 because they do not use SSE2.
Well ... I don't know. I have a Duron 1300 at home and a P4 1800 at work. The P4 is a lot faster for LL, but for factoring and P-1 I find that the Duron does a better job. I might be wrong though. When I get a new number to test I start the LL at work and the factoring at home ... just in case.
flava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2003-08-25, 22:44   #8
ColdFury
 
ColdFury's Avatar
 
Aug 2002

26·5 Posts
Default

Quote:
but for factoring and P-1 I find that the Duron does a better job. I might be wrong though.
P-1 uses SSE2 routines, just like the LL test, so it should be certainly faster than the Duron. Above 64 bits, SSE2 factoring routines kick in, and the P4 should beat the Duron there as well.
ColdFury is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 16:39.


Sun Aug 1 16:39:17 UTC 2021 up 9 days, 11:08, 0 users, load averages: 1.29, 1.35, 1.50

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.