mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Soap Box

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2013-04-03, 11:08   #793
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7·467 Posts
Default

Even if Mark Kirk has thought this way before about marriage equality, it's still surely a major step for him to come out and state his views now when they are clearly against his party line? It should make it harder for the GOP to brush off Rob Portman's change of attitude, wishing the same marriage rights for his gay son as for anyone else, as a freak exception. And maybe other senior Republicans, who also privately disagree with marriage being denied to same sex couples, or have at least smelt the strong winds of change in public attitudes, might now feel encouraged to say so too?
Brian-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-13, 10:37   #794
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7×467 Posts
Default

Is the GOP now so concerned about dissention in its senior ranks on the equal marriage issue that it won't listen to people voting against its party line?

Most of the media is reporting a unanimous vote by the national committee of the Republican party to oppose equal marriage and support Proposition 8.

But one committee member is claiming he voted against that motion but his vote was not heard.
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/04/12/was-gay-member-lone-no-vote-against-rnc-marriage-resolution/
Quote:
Bob Kabel, a gay D.C. Republican activist, said he shouted β€œno” when the time came to vote on the group of resolutions that included the anti-gay measure β€” despite media reports saying they were passed unanimously.
Brian-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-16, 01:44   #795
cheesehead
 
cheesehead's Avatar
 
"Richard B. Woods"
Aug 2002
Wisconsin USA

22·3·641 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian-E View Post
Is the GOP now so concerned about dissention in its senior ranks on the equal marriage issue that it won't listen to people voting against its party line?
I think the main senior GOP concern is a potential exodus of evangelicals, without which there would be a dearth of brick-making ballot-casting for Republican candidates in future elections.

Last fiddled with by cheesehead on 2013-04-16 at 01:50
cheesehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-17, 19:10   #796
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

2×5,393 Posts
Default

The sheep shaggers*have legalised gay marriage.

Paul

* As I believe the Australians call them in their vernacular. The phrase is applied to a variety of different populations around the world.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-17, 20:21   #797
Brian-E
 
Brian-E's Avatar
 
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands

7·467 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
The sheep shaggers*have legalised gay marriage.

Paul

* As I believe the Australians call them in their vernacular. The phrase is applied to a variety of different populations around the world.
Perhaps the sheep shaggers (I hadn't heard that name) will now invent a suitably derogatory name for their Aussie neighbours based on their current inability to go down the same road. Prime minister Gillard has responded by reaffirming her opposition to equal marriage. I can't understand her stance on this issue because as far as I know she does not fit any stereotypes of a traditional believer of marriage for one man and one woman: she is the leader of the socialist Labour party from which you might expect a progressive attitude, she is apparently atheist/non-religious, and she lives unapologetically and unmarried with her (male) partner so it's not as though she has old-fashioned ideas about these things. Can anyone with knowledge of Australia throw any light on this?
Brian-E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-17, 22:50   #798
chappy
 
chappy's Avatar
 
"Jeff"
Feb 2012
St. Louis, Missouri, USA

13×89 Posts
Default

I believe that same day the Kiwi's passed a resolution legalizing two new uses for sheep: meat and wool.
chappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-21, 04:53   #799
jasong
 
jasong's Avatar
 
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005

3×7×167 Posts
Default Question here because I start too many new threads IMO

Started writing a long thread, then deleted it to ask a more general question:

We probably have all had beliefs which we believed 100%, then later on there was a mental oopsie because we discovered new information. In my case my biggest one, at least that I can remember, was the discovery that effeminate doesn't mean the same thing it did decades ago, so I was unnecessarily hurting the feelings of the less-than-masculine people I encountered, many of them very kind people. More specifically, it was a verse in the Bible, and the word that's in more modern translations(more modern than NIV) is homosexual. That, in and of itself, opens up a whole new can of worms since, in my mind, temptation and full-on acceptance of something are worlds apart. So I had my second soul awakening involving that(basicly I woke up one day and said,"Wtf am I doing, I need to change this) and felt bad yet again.

Suffice it to say, if a gay or lesbian shows up in church now, I still disapprove, but I'll welcome them with open arms.

The question, if anyone wants to answer it, is what did you used to believe that you wish you never had because of the damage it did?

If this gets enough answers, please split it off. I just feel bad about the number of threads I've clogged the forums up with.
jasong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-21, 21:11   #800
garo
 
garo's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Termonfeckin, IE

22·691 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
The sheep shaggers*have legalised gay marriage.

Paul

* As I believe the Australians call them in their vernacular. The phrase is applied to a variety of different populations around the world.
I beg your pardon? A whingeing pommie using convict vernacular!
garo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-22, 04:09   #801
jasong
 
jasong's Avatar
 
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005

3·7·167 Posts
Default

Quote:
Prime minister Gillard has responded by reaffirming her opposition to equal marriage.
Seriously, dude? How about I pickpocket someone, then petition for equal income. Makes about the same amount of sense.

If you don't start with Christ, you're going to end with garbage.

Last fiddled with by jasong on 2013-04-22 at 04:09 Reason: too many quotes made it look silly.
jasong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-22, 06:36   #802
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

2×5,393 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garo View Post
I beg your pardon? A whingeing pommie using convict vernacular!
The only time I visited Australia I was asked whether I had a criminal record. Up until that point I wasn't aware that it was still an entry requirement.
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2013-04-23, 17:20   #803
firejuggler
 
firejuggler's Avatar
 
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow

2·1,303 Posts
Default

Gay marriage is adopted by France. 331 vote for, 225 against. But the opposition is still trying to oppose it by legal mean.
Check the detail on this wiki-page (the 2012-2013 part)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-se...iage_in_France

Last fiddled with by firejuggler on 2013-04-23 at 17:24
firejuggler is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Patient Rights R.D. Silverman Soap Box 25 2013-04-02 08:41
Marriage and Civil Partnerships: what is the ideal situation? Brian-E Soap Box 53 2013-02-19 16:31
Gay Marriage: weekly alternating viewpoints Brian-E Soap Box 46 2008-11-09 22:21

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:42.


Fri Aug 6 22:42:26 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 17:11, 1 user, load averages: 3.88, 3.95, 3.66

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.