mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Math

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-03-27, 19:43   #1
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

2·3·293 Posts
Default Non-Normalizability

This question came up in quantum mechanics. Basically, it is the last step in an attempted proof that a 1-D system can never have degeneracy.

Let \psi_1 be a normalized wavefunction, i.e. \psi_1 is a continuous complex-valued function defined on the real line and \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}|\psi_1(x)|^2dx=1.

Show that \psi_2(x)=\psi_1(x)\int_{0}^{x}\frac{1}{\psi_1(u)^2}du is not a normalizable wavefunction.

[Admittedly, this question has a flaw in the case when \psi_1 has a root. Let us ignore that issue; say \psi_1 has no roots].

Intuitively, my guess is that \psi_2 will fail to be normalizable because \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}|\psi_2(x)|^2dx diverges to \infty. This will probably be because as x goes to \infty, \int_{0}^{x}\frac{1}{\psi_1(u)^2}du diverges faster than \psi_1(x) converges to 0. But I can't think of how to show that.



Any hints please?

Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2008-03-27 at 19:45
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-03-27, 20:51   #2
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"𒉺𒌌𒇷𒆷𒀭"
May 2003
Down not across

2×5,393 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jinydu View Post
This question came up in quantum mechanics. Basically, it is the last step in an attempted proof that a 1-D system can never have degeneracy.
Hmm?

It's a long time since I last did any quantum mechanics but I don't remember any such prohibition.

Consider an ensemble of bosons confined to one spatial dimension (a reasonable approximation to the intracavity state of a laser). I can't see any reason why they can't all populate the ground state or, for that matter, any other state.

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your use of the term "1-D system".


Paul
xilman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-03-27, 21:11   #3
masser
 
masser's Avatar
 
Jul 2003
wear a mask

32148 Posts
Default

Doh! nevermind...

Last fiddled with by masser on 2008-03-27 at 21:34
masser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-03-27, 22:09   #4
ewmayer
2ω=0
 
ewmayer's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
República de California

19·613 Posts
Default

The following may need to be tweaked a little because I just noticed that the definition of Psi2 involves the integral of 1/Psi1^2 for 0 to x [rather than over the whole real line], but I think the approach is sound:

Let |.| be shorthand for "norm"; in your example specifically the L^2 norm as defined over the real line.

We have f(x) such that |f| = 1.

Let g(x) = 1/f(x). From the definition of your space, we see that |f*g| = |1| [* means simple scalar multiply here] is not normalizable, since the integral of a nonzero constant over the real line diverges.

By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, |f*g| <= |f|*|g|. Since |f| = 1 and |f*g| diverges, |g| diverges as well, i.e. |g| = |1/f| is not normalizable.

Now consider h(x) = C*f(x), with C := |1/f| = |g|. Taking the norm of both sides, we have

|h| = |C*f| = ||g|*f|. |g| [even though it diverges] is just a constant, so can be pulled out, thus

|h| = |g|*|f| = |g|, which diverges. QED
ewmayer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-03-27, 22:33   #5
jinydu
 
jinydu's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Hopefully Near M48

6DE16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding your use of the term "1-D system".
Indeed. I meant a 1-D system with 1 particle.

Basically, the equation for \psi_2 comes from solving the Schrodinger equation, assuming that I already have a solution, which I call \psi_1. I used the 'reduction of order' technique for second-order linear differential equations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ewmayer View Post
The following may need to be tweaked a little because I just noticed that the definition of Psi2 involves the integral of 1/Psi1^2 for 0 to x [rather than over the whole real line], but I think the approach is sound:
Indeed. The integral is in fact meant to give an antiderivative. Any one will do.

Also, in the definition of \psi_2, I omitted the absolute value on purpose. It really isn't supposed to be there; that's just the way the reduction of order calculation went. So even if the integral were over the whole real line, it still wouldn't be the L^2 norm.

But thanks for trying.

EDIT: On second thought, I might need a stronger result than simply showing that \psi_2 is not normalizable. I might need to show that it is does not converge to 0 as x goes to \infty.

Here is the overall outline of the argument.

Any stationary state of a 1-particle 1-D quantum system satisfies the time-independent Schrodinger equation:

-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2\psi}{dx^2}+V(x)\psi=E\psi

The goal is to show that for any fixed value of E, there is only one physically realizable state, up to multiplication by a constant. I know from ODE theory that the general equation to that differential equation, for a fixed E, will be \psi(x)=c_1\psi_1(x)+c_2\psi_2(x), where \psi_1 and \psi_2 are two linearly-independent solutions. At first, this would seem to refute my claim that there is only one allowed state; but quantum mechanics imposes an additional constraint: a physically realizable state must be normalized. My idea is to show that if \psi_1 is normalized, then the only way to make \psi normalized is to set c_2=0. This will imply the desired result.

Using reduction of order, I already know what \psi_2 must be (yes V(x) cancels out in the middle of the calculation). If I can show that it does not decay to 0 at infinity, this will imply that \psi(x)=c_1\psi_1(x)+c_2\psi_2(x) does not decay to zero at infinity (since we know that \psi_1 does) whenever c_2 is nonzero. I will then be able to use a proof by contradiction.

Last fiddled with by jinydu on 2008-03-27 at 23:06
jinydu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


All times are UTC. The time now is 22:11.


Fri Aug 6 22:11:40 UTC 2021 up 14 days, 16:40, 1 user, load averages: 2.74, 3.05, 2.90

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.