mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2008-03-09, 22:43   #1
ixfd64
Bemusing Prompter
 
ixfd64's Avatar
 
"Danny"
Dec 2002
California

45268 Posts
Default MonoDevelop vs. Code::Blocks

I'm looking for a free (as in beer) Windows IDE for compiling C/C++ files. I've used Dev-C++ up until now, but it is pretty obsolete and has not been updated for over three years.

I've heard that MonoDevelop and Code::Blocks are much better than Dev-C++. I've also used Eclipse, but I don't like it very much because it can be pretty complicated, does not have built-in C/C++ support, and still has some bugs (for example, error highlighting sometimes fails to update unless I save the file).

So should I use MonoDevelop or Code::Blocks?
ixfd64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-03-10, 08:30   #2
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

11000001101002 Posts
Default

I think it a matter of trying them both (and others) and see which one you like the most. It seems to be an individual choice thing, which I guess is why we all have so many editors to choose from.
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transporting Large Stone Blocks a1call Lounge 6 2017-11-02 18:58
Rho code Happy5214 YAFU 3 2015-11-01 21:54
Odd perfect related road blocks II jchein1 Factoring 632 2011-11-14 15:14
Odd perfect related road blocks jchein1 Factoring 31 2009-04-29 15:18
Question about triming [code] blocks schickel Forum Feedback 4 2009-04-01 03:27

All times are UTC. The time now is 03:25.


Sat Jul 17 03:25:11 UTC 2021 up 50 days, 1:12, 1 user, load averages: 1.43, 1.53, 1.44

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.