|
2008-03-03, 19:45
|
#1 |
Sep 2004
2×5×283 Posts |
1,000,000
Countdown to 1,000,000 candidates tested overall.
By my calculation we are very close: 923,766 tested... 923,766=638,796-299,809+584,779 (from stats Mar 01, 2008 (13:00 GMT)) Last fiddled with by em99010pepe on 2008-03-03 at 19:46 |
|
|
|
2008-03-03, 19:56
|
#2 |
Mar 2006
Germany
23·3·112 Posts |
i will try to get the new stats the next hours, results for 2 days to go!
but by now it's not possible to figure out who is the user with this pair! have to try a script to copy all submitted pairs from all servers in one file sorted by date/time. PS: manual LLR pairs could not be specified by date/time! Last fiddled with by kar_bon on 2008-03-03 at 20:00 |
|
|
|
|
2008-03-03, 19:56
|
#3 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Way cool!
 I wonder what the 1,000,000th candidate will be: LLRnet or manual LLR? Top-5000 or lower range?
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-03, 20:01
|
#4 | |
|
Account Deleted
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA
17·251 Posts |
Quote:
If I counted right (I left drive #3 out, since it's so early it would be far less than half average...and too hard to find average), and half of an average of 2250 candidates per file are completed, that's about 65250 candidates (I count 15 from Drive 1 and 43 from Drive 2). That added with your numbers makes 923766+65250=989016 With the age of the stats you're pulling, and an amount of unknown from what I'm pulling (plus my exclusion of Drive 3), I'd say it's not clear whether we have or haven't tested our millionth (not clear, but I'd say we have). If you want to look at the 1,000,000th reported, well, that's another story. Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2008-03-03 at 20:01 |
|
|
|
|
