LLRnet servers for NPLB

[gd_barnes]

Originally Posted by em99010pepe

I shutdown forever server C6000. Sorry.
All files in the attachment, don't forget to import results.txt to stats page.

Max,

Can you sort this out? I can't find a link to Carlos' web page that has all FORMER results files on it so I can't match up the sieve file with the results.

If you don't have time to see exactly what remains, can you post a link to his web page with former results and I'll see what I can do with it.

Ian offered in a PM to me to do a little clean up work on this if needed. If we can get the correct k/n pairs remaining, we'll avoid duplicate work. Ian, there is mostly n=900K-1M work left with some straggling pairs for n<900K. There's that range that you don't want to lose off of your k's. :-)


Thanks,
Gary

[IronBits]

I just put all his results files that I have of his out in nplb.ironbits/html/results for you ;)

results_20081228_1643_CC_nplb_6000.txt is the last one I have.

[MyDogBuster]

Ian, there is mostly n=900K-1M work left with some straggling pairs for n<900K. There's that range that you don't want to lose off of your k's. :-)

Send me what you think is close to right. I'll re-arrange somethings and make room.

[gd_barnes]

Max,

Never mind my earlier request. I was able to get it sorted out.

David,

Thanks for the link to Carlos's port 443/6000 results files that had the results I needed for k=341. I was able to find what pairs were remaining by matching up the files.

Please incorporate the attached final results file from port 6000 into your server. This is the one that Carlos left attached in his prior post when he left.


...
Whew, I'm glad to have that off my task list! It's usually a mess when a server is stopped in the middle of processing. This one was no exception with large blocks of k/n pairs remaining right in the middle of the range.


Gary

[kar_bon]

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Max,

Never mind my earlier request. I was able to get it sorted out.

oh, did that the last few minutes (in PM to Gary) toooo late! perhaps compare both results!

[gd_barnes]

Originally Posted by MyDogBuster

Send me what you think is close to right. I'll re-arrange somethings and make room.

Ian,

For k=341, there are 1252 pairs remaining with several large holes. The range remaining goes from n=~891.8K to 1M. Here it is attached with all holes taken into account. As you'll be able to see, port 6000 had already processed everything right in the middle from n=926.2K-965.8K. None of the range n>966.2K was processed so it is fully contiguous.

Have fun!


For everyone's (namely mine) balancing reference:

k=341 sieve file: 8168 pairs.

Continguous results processed for n=600K-891.7K: 6000 pairs
Results with holes processed for n=891.8K-966.2K: 916 pairs
File posted for Ian to process: 1252 pairs

Total: 8168 pairs.

Edit: I just now found out that Karsten independently came up with the same file of remaining k/n pairs that I did.


Gary

[henryzz]

why couldnt we have just started the server up again on one of gary's or david's machines

[mdettweiler]

Originally Posted by henryzz

why couldnt we have just started the server up again on one of gary's or david's machines

You're right, we could have done that easily. However, it looks like Ian's already willing to do the work, so thus we didn't bother setting up a server for it.

However, we *will* be using the now-idle G8000 LLRnet server for the upcoming individual-k drive (which includes k=315, formerly loaded into C6000). We'll be starting that effort sometime later this month after the sieving drive has completed and we've restarted the 8th Drive.

[gd_barnes]

The progress report hasn't updated in several hours.

[IronBits]

Progress report tables are no longer created, because it's being handled nicely by the database progress reports.
Hourly web page updates re-enabled.

[em99010pepe]

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Expect no favors if you return. I hope you finally find what you are looking for.

I don't need any favors from you.

Carlos