LLRnet servers for NPLB - Page 49

mdettweiler · 2008-12-15, 17:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by henryzz

could
http://nplb.ironbits.net/progress_400.html
be added to the first post of this thread

Done.

gd_barnes · 2008-12-19, 12:40

David,

After you get the file for port 5000 from Max for our new 6th drive, can you set up a daily progress table like you've done for port 400?

Thanks,
Gary

IronBits · 2008-12-19, 18:15

done, done and done.

gd_barnes · 2008-12-20, 11:37

As stated by Carlos in another thread, his port 443 has changed to port 6000. I have changed the 1st post in this thread. Please make the change to your machines if necessary.

henryzz · 2008-12-20, 16:32

http://nplb.ironbits.net/progress_5000.html
needs to be added to the first post at some point

mdettweiler · 2008-12-20, 16:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by henryzz

http://nplb.ironbits.net/progress_5000.html
needs to be added to the first post at some point

Done.

gd_barnes · 2008-12-22, 23:33

Max,

OK, maybe I was wrong. Perhaps we should have loaded up a 10K range in the servers for the new drives, at least on port 400 anyway. lol

We're already at n=601K after just a few hours and I don't I don't want to mess with moving some cores to port 5000 as well as some CRUS efforts until late Tuesday after I get back from a short business trip. I well underestimated how popular the higher n-ranges are still. Please go ahead and send n=606.2K-610K to port 400.

If Ian decides to stay permanently on port 4000 with his current level of resources, we can start sending it n=10K ranges also, at least until the next fftlen change. Therefore, you can also go ahead and load n=607K-610K into port 4000.

Thanks for taking care of all of the files for the new drives, both server-related and manual.

The drives may decrease a little bit in popularity as we get the k=1005-2000 effort rolled out. So we'll take it on a case-by-case basis.

The seamless transition from the 1st drive to the 5th-6th-7th drives has worked out even better than I expected.

Gary

mdettweiler · 2008-12-23, 00:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by gd_barnes

Max,

OK, maybe I was wrong. Perhaps we should have loaded up a 10K range in the servers for the new drives, at least on port 400 anyway. lol

We're already at n=601K after just a few hours and I don't I don't want to mess with moving some cores to port 5000 as well as some CRUS efforts until late Tuesday after I get back from a short business trip. I well underestimated how popular the higher n-ranges are still. Please go ahead and send n=606.2K-610K to port 400.

If Ian decides to stay permanently on port 4000 with his current level of resources, we can start sending it n=10K ranges also, at least until the next fftlen change. Therefore, you can also go ahead and load n=607K-610K into port 4000.

Thanks for taking care of all of the files for the new drives, both server-related and manual.

The drives may decrease a little bit in popularity as we get the k=1005-2000 effort rolled out. So we'll take it on a case-by-case basis.

The seamless transition from the 1st drive to the 5th-6th-7th drives has worked out even better than I expected.

Gary

Okay, I'll load the ranges you mentioned into the respective servers shortly...

MyDogBuster · 2008-12-23, 08:53

David, could you look in on CRUS port 6. I'm cleaning that port up and would like to know how much is left.

Thanks in advance.

IronBits · 2008-12-23, 15:08

No progress report for that server, but, there is this... ;)

http://crus.ironbits.net/
Port 6 has 4469 remaining
knpairs.txt - Size: 60,344
Last Updated: 10/26/2008 12:33 PM
first k/n pair 168610 119192
last k/n pair 123285 130000

Clean it all up so we can make it go away. Gary can now run a Crus server instead

Been to Boise a few times.

MyDogBuster · 2008-12-23, 16:21

The following was posted on CRUS by Rogue and may be of interest here.

http://www.mersenneforum.org/showpos...4&postcount=83

Quote:

Of note, I am working on new software that I am calling PRPNet. It should be possible to replace LLRNet with it. The client can run either LLR or Phrot. I have a long way to go, but if I'm lucky I might have something ready for testing by the end of the year.
This software is neither designed to compete with BOINC (PrimeGrid) nor work like LLRNet. In fact, it will be very similar to ECMNet. Eventually I'll start a new thread containing the software and from there solicit users for enhancements.

Can't wait for that one.

2008-12-23, 15:08	#538
IronBits I ♥ BOINC! Oct 2002 Glendale, AZ. (USA) 1113₁₀ Posts	No progress report for that server, but, there is this... ;) http://crus.ironbits.net/ Port 6 has 4469 remaining knpairs.txt - Size: 60,344 Last Updated: 10/26/2008 12:33 PM first k/n pair 168610 119192 last k/n pair 123285 130000 Clean it all up so we can make it go away. Gary can now run a Crus server instead Been to Boise a few times. Last fiddled with by IronBits on 2008-12-23 at 15:11

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
PRPnet servers for NPLB	mdettweiler	No Prime Left Behind	228	2018-12-26 04:50
Servers for NPLB	gd_barnes	No Prime Left Behind	0	2009-08-10 19:21
LLRnet servers for CRUS	gd_barnes	Conjectures 'R Us	39	2008-07-15 10:26
NPLB LLRnet server discussion	em99010pepe	No Prime Left Behind	229	2008-04-30 19:13
NPLB LLRnet server #1 - dried	em99010pepe	No Prime Left Behind	19	2008-03-26 06:19

2008-12-19, 12:40	#530
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 2×41×127 Posts	David, After you get the file for port 5000 from Max for our new 6th drive, can you set up a daily progress table like you've done for port 400? Thanks, Gary

2008-12-19, 18:15	#531
IronBits I ♥ BOINC! Oct 2002 Glendale, AZ. (USA) 1113₁₀ Posts	done, done and done.

2008-12-20, 11:37	#532
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 2×41×127 Posts	As stated by Carlos in another thread, his port 443 has changed to port 6000. I have changed the 1st post in this thread. Please make the change to your machines if necessary.

2008-12-20, 16:32	#533
henryzz Just call me Henry "David" Sep 2007 Cambridge (GMT/BST) 7·29² Posts	http://nplb.ironbits.net/progress_5000.html needs to be added to the first post at some point

2008-12-22, 23:33	#535
gd_barnes May 2007 Kansas; USA 2×41×127 Posts	Max, OK, maybe I was wrong. Perhaps we should have loaded up a 10K range in the servers for the new drives, at least on port 400 anyway. lol We're already at n=601K after just a few hours and I don't I don't want to mess with moving some cores to port 5000 as well as some CRUS efforts until late Tuesday after I get back from a short business trip. I well underestimated how popular the higher n-ranges are still. Please go ahead and send n=606.2K-610K to port 400. If Ian decides to stay permanently on port 4000 with his current level of resources, we can start sending it n=10K ranges also, at least until the next fftlen change. Therefore, you can also go ahead and load n=607K-610K into port 4000. Thanks for taking care of all of the files for the new drives, both server-related and manual. The drives may decrease a little bit in popularity as we get the k=1005-2000 effort rolled out. So we'll take it on a case-by-case basis. The seamless transition from the 1st drive to the 5th-6th-7th drives has worked out even better than I expected. Gary

2008-12-23, 08:53	#537
MyDogBuster May 2008 Wilmington, DE B24₁₆ Posts	David, could you look in on CRUS port 6. I'm cleaning that port up and would like to know how much is left. Thanks in advance.