![]() |
|
|
#452 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32·13·89 Posts |
I have now swapped the hard drives so that the server is on one of my coolest and most stable machines. Max will get it running sometime later today (Weds).
Gary |
|
|
|
|
|
#453 | |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
32×13×89 Posts |
Quote:
After that, fire away with your cores if you want. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-12-10 at 09:54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#454 | |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
3×2,083 Posts |
Quote:
![]() Going to go work on it right now... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#455 |
|
A Sunny Moo
Aug 2007
USA (GMT-5)
141518 Posts |
Okay, G4000 is now officially back online!
![]() I've submitted all me queued k/n pairs; Ian, let me know when you're all set so I can then change the deadline back to 5 days. (As mentioned in my last post, it's currently set to 20 days.) Carlos and others: feel free to connect as soon as you wish. With the deadline set to 20 days there's no danger of anybody's results expiring for the time being.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#456 |
|
Sep 2004
2×5×283 Posts |
Moved 3 cores, more 4 later when I get home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#457 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
54448 Posts |
Quote:
Last fiddled with by MyDogBuster on 2008-12-10 at 17:44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#458 |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
54448 Posts |
Okay, right out of an episode of the Twilight Zone, da da da da,
I tried again and this time they were accepted. So I guess I'm all caught up. I haven't got a clue as to why they worked the second time and not the first. |
|
|
|
|
|
#459 |
|
Sep 2004
2×5×283 Posts |
I'm full power on G4000.
Ian, good to know the results were accepted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#460 | |
|
May 2008
Wilmington, DE
22·23·31 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#461 |
|
Sep 2004
2×5×283 Posts |
Hey Lennart, a little push on G4000?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#462 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
28AD16 Posts |
We aren't going to add any more work to G4000 with this drive. Having Carlos and Ian on it should be sufficient. If it looks like IB400 is going to finish before G4000, I'll start moving machines. Regardless of that, we still have the final n=1.8K range that we'll load into IB400 before I would move any of my machines.
As long as you can calculate that port G4000 will finish by Dec. 23rd-24th with its current work and cores, then we won't need anyone more on it. If later, I can always move a few machines. Edit: What do people think about a rally at this point? I'm thinking now that one won't be necessary. It might even be overly risky. With port G4000 back up, we should have stable ports until the 1st drive is complete (estimated at Dec. 23rd-24th somewhere ~1 week ago) and we have plenty of resources to get there now. The estimate had assumed that Sheep wouldn't be doing any processing and I see now that he is doing ~1500 pairs/day. Edit 2: Perhaps a rally to kick off the new n>600K drives and to get them rolling fast would be a good option; perhaps the last weekend of Dec. or first weekend of Jan. Gary Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2008-12-10 at 21:25 Reason: Edits |
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PRPnet servers for NPLB | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 228 | 2018-12-26 04:50 |
| Servers for NPLB | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 0 | 2009-08-10 19:21 |
| LLRnet servers for CRUS | gd_barnes | Conjectures 'R Us | 39 | 2008-07-15 10:26 |
| NPLB LLRnet server discussion | em99010pepe | No Prime Left Behind | 229 | 2008-04-30 19:13 |
| NPLB LLRnet server #1 - dried | em99010pepe | No Prime Left Behind | 19 | 2008-03-26 06:19 |