![]() |
|
|
#254 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33·5·7·11 Posts |
Max,
The final results file sent to me was incorrect. See the LLRnet servers thread for the issue. I'll need to get a corrected file to feel comfortable that the primes found match those here and elsewhere. Gary |
|
|
|
|
#255 |
|
May 2007
Kansas; USA
33×5×7×11 Posts |
I have verified the results for n=540K-600K. In comparison with post 1 of this thread, the 3rd drive page, the Rieselprime.org page, and the top-5000 site, no problems were found.
The drive is now officially complete. Karsten, you can mark all k=300-400 at n=600K that are currently at a lower testing limit. Also, you can update k=400-1001 to show all k's now at n=540K if they are currently at a lower testing limit with the exception of k=415 that Curtis is working on and that I believe is still at n=500K. Gary |
|
|
|
|
#256 | |
|
Mar 2006
Germany
23·3·112 Posts |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Team drive #6 k=600-800 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 89 | 2011-03-10 12:34 |
| Team drive #5: k=400-600 n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 135 | 2010-11-23 14:27 |
| Doublecheck drive #2: k=300-400 n=260K-600K | mdettweiler | No Prime Left Behind | 0 | 2010-05-21 00:22 |
| Team drive #4, 15 k's < 300 for n=600K-1M | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 38 | 2008-10-22 16:20 |
| Team drive #2: k=400-1001 n=260K-333.2K | gd_barnes | No Prime Left Behind | 154 | 2008-03-31 02:59 |