New repunit (PRP) primes found, 5794777 and 8177207 decimal digits (PRP records) - Page 7

bur · 2021-11-17, 11:28

When looking at the stats I noticed that the ranges 6M-7M and 7M-8M are not yet 100% completed but have a few exponents with status "unknown". Is there a specific reason for that?

sweety439 · 2021-11-18, 12:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by bur

When looking at the stats I noticed that the ranges 6M-7M and 7M-8M are not yet 100% completed but have a few exponents with status "unknown". Is there a specific reason for that?

but A004023 already shown that "8177207" as a(11) ....

Batalov · 2021-11-18, 21:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by sweety439

but A004023 already shown that "8177207" as a(11) ....

Not all those who can read, can comprehend. Also, not all those who can read, actually do read.

Hint: re-read the complete text of A004023. What, upon reading, becomes suddenly more clear? For those who have ADD, - ok: pay attention to the 6th paragraph in the 'Comments' section.

bur · 2021-11-26, 06:57

To be honest, I also don't get it. The search limit is 10,800,000 but some numbers in the 6-8M range have not been checked yet (or at least it's not documented).

ryanp · 2021-11-26, 14:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by bur

To be honest, I also don't get it. The search limit is 10,800,000 but some numbers in the 6-8M range have not been checked yet (or at least it's not documented).

I can confirm I have tested the whole 6M..8M range, based on the sieved input file I was given.

The first untested candidate is now: (10^10954843-1)/9 so the search limit is actually about 10.9M.

Batalov · 2021-11-26, 22:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by bur

To be honest, I also don't get it. The search limit is 10,800,000 but some numbers in the 6-8M range have not been checked yet (or at least it's not documented).

Our project was completely independent - independent sieve and independent testing. We do not coordinate with that site. We cannot help you (or that site) document what you for some idle reason want to have documented. Talk to that site directly.

Better yet - Step 1. you feel that some candidate is untested. Next step: For Pete's sake, test it then!

rudy235 · 2021-12-15, 23:32

Re :R49081

Quote:

Originally Posted by paulunderwood

I am 10.5 months into certification -- I now guess it will be done by Christmas

Hello Paul. Christmas is approaching. I just wonder. How is the certification going?

2021-11-17, 11:28	#67
bur Aug 2020 796581e-4;32539e-3 1316₈ Posts	When looking at the stats I noticed that the ranges 6M-7M and 7M-8M are not yet 100% completed but have a few exponents with status "unknown". Is there a specific reason for that? Last fiddled with by bur on 2021-11-17 at 11:29

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Generalized Repunit primes	Bob Underwood	Math	12	2020-10-11 20:01
Some CADO-NFS Work At Around 175-180 Decimal Digits	EdH	CADO-NFS	127	2020-10-07 01:47
Integers congruent to last two decimal digits mod 23	enzocreti	enzocreti	1	2020-03-03 18:38
Twin Primes with 128 Decimal Digits	tuckerkao	Miscellaneous Math	2	2020-02-16 06:23
records for primes	3.14159	Information & Answers	8	2018-12-09 00:08

2021-11-26, 06:57	#70
bur Aug 2020 796581e-4;32539e-3 2×359 Posts	To be honest, I also don't get it. The search limit is 10,800,000 but some numbers in the 6-8M range have not been checked yet (or at least it's not documented).