3,748+ c204 Smaller-but-Needed - Page 30

EdH · 2021-12-29, 13:18

Well Done!

Thanks for heading this up and taking it through completion!

charybdis · 2021-12-29, 15:27

Congratulations! Always a relief to see that the factors are out of ECM range.

Don't forget to inform Sam Wagstaff if you haven't already.

kruoli · 2021-12-29, 17:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by charybdis

Congratulations! Always a relief to see that the factors are out of ECM range.

Yes, this was my first thought, too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by charybdis

Don't forget to inform Sam Wagstaff if you haven't already.

I never wrote a mail to him before (I think somebody else reserved the number for us), but did so just now. Hopefully it finds him well. Thanks for the reminder!

frmky · 2021-12-30, 06:49

Congratulations!

Dr Sardonicus · 2021-12-30, 16:50

Apparently the email did find SSW well.

The result has been added to Page 140 (the latest page) page at the Cunningham Project.

Congratulations on cracking quite a hard nut!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Using 16e on smaller numbers	fivemack	Factoring	3	2017-09-19 08:52
NFS on smaller numbers?	skan	YAFU	6	2013-02-26 13:57
Bernoulli(200) c204	akruppa	Factoring	114	2012-08-20 14:01
checking smaller number	fortega	Data	2	2005-06-16 22:48
Factoring Smaller Numbers	marc	Factoring	6	2004-10-09 14:17

2021-12-29, 13:18	#320
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 2²×7²×23 Posts	Well Done! Thanks for heading this up and taking it through completion!

2021-12-29, 15:27	#321
charybdis Apr 2020 2·3³·13 Posts	Congratulations! Always a relief to see that the factors are out of ECM range. Don't forget to inform Sam Wagstaff if you haven't already.

2021-12-30, 06:49	#323
frmky Jul 2003 So Cal 4502₈ Posts	Congratulations!

2021-12-30, 16:50	#324
Dr Sardonicus Feb 2017 Nowhere 53×109 Posts	Apparently the email did find SSW well. The result has been added to Page 140 (the latest page) page at the Cunningham Project. Congratulations on cracking quite a hard nut!