![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3·7·167 Posts |
![]()
I've been doing Cunningham numbers on my Sempron for about a week, but I didn't realize until now that I had made a slight boo-boo.
I'm doing 45-digit numbers, but I was using guidelines from a different source for B1 and B2. I'm using B1=11e6 and B2=2.6e10 and the predicted curve count is 5500, which is much different from the Cunningham number page. Honestly, I had simply assumed from my quick perusal of the page(where I missed the instructions) that this person was simply more thorough with their curve counts. What should I do? (For the moment, I'm keeping my settings) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3×277 Posts |
![]()
Just report what fraction you did. Example:
When you did 55 of such curves, you can report 55/5500 = 0.01 for that specific digit level. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Factoring humongous Cunningham numbers | Yamato | Factoring | 1872 | 2023-01-14 09:08 |
New phi for homogeneous Cunningham numbers | wpolly | Factoring | 30 | 2022-12-14 18:35 |
Finding factors of cunningham-like numbers | Zeta-Flux | Factoring | 187 | 2008-05-20 14:38 |
Don't know how to work on Cunningham numbers. | jasong | GMP-ECM | 6 | 2006-06-30 08:51 |
Need help factoring Cunningham numbers | jasong | Factoring | 27 | 2006-03-21 02:47 |