![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3·7·167 Posts |
![]()
I know I'm supposed to do Stage 1 with Prime95 and Stage 2 with GMP-ECM, but I can't for the life of me find the instructions.
![]() I'll have finished up my SOB sieving by early Wednesday morning GMT, so I think I've got plenty of time to learn, but I'd really appreciate some help. Thanks in advance! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3×277 Posts |
![]()
You'll probably find this thread interesting, especially #23.
Basically, you have to: 1. Add GmpEcmHook=1 to your prime.ini 2. Enter the number you want to factor into worktodo.ini (the syntax for ECM2 can be found in whatsnew.txt - important: set B2 value to 1) 3. ecm -resume [resultsFile] 1 [B1]-[wantedB2] > [outputFile] You have to replace the [xyz] with the resp. content. And maybe you want to add the "-n" parameter to the start to lower the priority of gmp-ecm. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3×7×167 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() Edit(question): Quote:
Also, I need to know how to reserve numbers.(I'm just now reading the other threads, so I apologize if it's easily answered) Last fiddled with by jasong on 2006-03-19 at 12:56 |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Oct 2004
Austria
1001101100102 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Edit: The seventh value (here in bold font) the line ECM=16384,11000000,1,100,0,0,1,0 determines if you want to ecm a number of the form 2^n-1 or 2^n+1. 0 stands for 2^n-1 and 1 for 2^n+1. Last fiddled with by Andi47 on 2006-03-19 at 13:17 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Feb 2004
France
3·311 Posts |
![]()
What are the differences between:
ECM=16384,11000000,1,100,0,0,1,0 and: ECM2=1,2,16384,1,44000000,0,20,0,0 ? Last one (ECM2) provides the following results in results file: 2^16384+1 completed 10 ECM curves, B1=44000000, B2=4290000000 T. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
3·7·167 Posts |
![]()
I apologize in advance if a search could've solved this problem, but I'm hoping the answer will be easy for you, although not obvious to me.
I've been told ecm is a basically random process. In the case of first running Prime95 and then ecm is it still that same random process? Basically, what I'm asking is: Should I just randomly pick a number from the Cunningham tables and run it for, say, 24 hours, then report the number of curves? Or is there something else I need to be aware of? (Obviously, if I find a factor, I'll report it. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
11001111112 Posts |
![]() Quote:
If it's the first: ECM2 can be used in a much more general way, as base, exponent and constant can be chosen "arbitrarily". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Oct 2004
Austria
2·17·73 Posts |
![]() Quote:
"Do 20 curves at B1=44M on 1*2^16384+1", and if the bold value is 0, it would do curves on 1*2^16384-1 ? What are the other values, being zero in this example? Last fiddled with by Andi47 on 2006-03-19 at 14:31 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
14778 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
By the way: In certain circumstances, it could be better to also use gmp-ecm for stage1. This is especially the case when: 1. the remaining composite is much smaller than the original number and/or 2. the base is greater than 2. In such cases, you should do a speed comparison of stage1 before fully getting into the factorization of that number. Be aware that most numbers of the Cunningham Tables already sustained quite some factorization effort. I wouldn't start below the 45 digit range (--> B1=11M). |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||||
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
3×277 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last fiddled with by Mystwalker on 2006-03-19 at 14:41 |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Oct 2004
Austria
2×17×73 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Factoring humongous Cunningham numbers | Yamato | Factoring | 1872 | 2023-01-14 09:08 |
New phi for homogeneous Cunningham numbers | wpolly | Factoring | 30 | 2022-12-14 18:35 |
Finding factors of cunningham-like numbers | Zeta-Flux | Factoring | 187 | 2008-05-20 14:38 |
Don't know how to work on Cunningham numbers. | jasong | GMP-ECM | 6 | 2006-06-30 08:51 |
Doing Cunningham numbers but messed up. | jasong | Factoring | 1 | 2006-04-03 17:18 |