mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Factoring

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2014-02-05, 21:42   #12
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

11·172 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
In the coming weeks/months I will continue working on all the numbers below C200 in the list of most difficult numbers.
Wow, a lot more in the C190s. All the other "ten" ranges only had 4 or 5 composites. This range still has 21 remaining. I've generated all the SNFS polynomials. Most are Sigma(n^46) which is most suitable for degree-6.

PM me if you would like one or more to work on and I will send you the poly file. Each will take 5-6 days on a dedicated Core-i5. Just start factMsieve with the poly file and let it run. Let me know if anyone is interested, or you can pick one from the file itself. Just let me know which you choose so we don't duplicate work.

They range from SNFS-192 to SNFS-204 difficulty.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-11, 16:35   #13
chris2be8
 
chris2be8's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

2×7×139 Posts
Default

Will the "most difficult" composites need ECM running against them before SNFS? I can do it either way, but needs to be allowed for.

Chris
chris2be8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-11, 16:52   #14
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

317910 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris2be8 View Post
Will the "most difficult" composites need ECM running against them before SNFS? I can do it either way, but needs to be allowed for
In my last correspondence with Pascal, he said a decent number of curves have been run but he doesn't keep track. So far, I haven't had an "ECM miss".

I will stop before getting to a C200. Though a C198 may be an SNFS-204 difficulty.
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-12, 01:10   #15
ThomRuley
 
ThomRuley's Avatar
 
May 2003

35 Posts
Default

Could I talk you into making a few polys from the t500 file? Mine are taking forever, but the actual NFS seems to be moving reasonably.
ThomRuley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-12, 02:31   #16
wombatman
I moo ablest echo power!
 
wombatman's Avatar
 
May 2013

1,741 Posts
Default

Thom, which ones from the t500 file are you looking at? I've cleared a few from there (and am working my way down the list).
wombatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-12, 14:51   #17
ThomRuley
 
ThomRuley's Avatar
 
May 2003

35 Posts
Default

I'll take these for now:

6115909044841454629 12
321381569252585866953628783126948367071187906389518216907098417372109834635071531 2
9235379541700294893241592533312191410548921 4
18855337777262169791 10
42223362249943191270479011547514088211349705097809873373648793992949125900561049993 2
33579221106357041 12

Let me know if anyone else is already working on these.

Thanks

Thom
ThomRuley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-12, 16:15   #18
wombatman
I moo ablest echo power!
 
wombatman's Avatar
 
May 2013

1,741 Posts
Default

I'll have to double check when I get home, but I believe I'm currently on:

53041017196666952234619819994982127672443220243418249007541741030212106804476059 2

No idea if anybody else is working on the file, but I'll take those off my batch list if you want them. Roughly how long will each of them take, do you think?
wombatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-12, 20:22   #19
ThomRuley
 
ThomRuley's Avatar
 
May 2003

111100112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wombatman View Post
I'll have to double check when I get home, but I believe I'm currently on:

53041017196666952234619819994982127672443220243418249007541741030212106804476059 2

No idea if anybody else is working on the file, but I'll take those off my batch list if you want them. Roughly how long will each of them take, do you think?
No problem, I'll just take that one off my list. This is why we need to communicate with each other about composites. Thanks
ThomRuley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-13, 03:24   #20
wombatman
I moo ablest echo power!
 
wombatman's Avatar
 
May 2013

174110 Posts
Default

Well, I'm getting forgetful already, but I'm actually working on:

20241187^29-1
C151

It should be finished by Friday evening.
wombatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-13, 04:25   #21
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

11·172 Posts
Default

I can't seem to locate the wiki page on degree halving but I will post two polys from the t500.txt file if anyone is interested.

Code:
82932783659784864101 10

n: 14668426862825327643478642613752190334921815625710231530196536758731353111989670069823132151031683951702388087602570541194382925113356037064684273416829280380908509371047337
# 82932783659784864101^11-1, difficulty: 199.19, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 2.22
# cost: 1.3144e+17, est. time: 62.59 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 1.000
c5: 1
c4: 1
c3: -4
c2: -3
c1: 3
c0: 1
Y1: -82932783659784864101
Y0: 6877846605560679357661513062775038538202
m: 6638302919148143756548444023751343110512646774028322539454017523519024748726117291987933565320356252394470990730374728987385239556102040293564160261777386744194135007509561
type: snfs


1949751789915161 12

n: 178582760001354166553578106439433291393431180054089262671541219332034706214132826774027843833802708445291048587466523534490409654996494041174800154595618546224102815160715367622393
# 1949751789915161^13-1, difficulty: 183.48, skewness: 1.00, alpha: 3.10
# cost: 3.21513e+16, est. time: 15.31 GHz days (not accurate yet!)
skew: 1.000
c6: 1
c5: 1
c4: -5
c3: -4
c2: 6
c1: 3
c0: -1
Y1: -1949751789915161
Y0: 3801532042277374115783577655922
m: 178582759999806160677961385995543625559262607541818145383600310736688148336500964108316190094531539174959912589299553133029586112864519785072165516315129152499838566672770974464982
type: snfs
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2014-02-13, 04:31   #22
wombatman
I moo ablest echo power!
 
wombatman's Avatar
 
May 2013

1,741 Posts
Default

I'll tackle that second one (1949751789915161^13-1). How did you generate those SNFS polys?

Edit: I must be doing something wrong. When I use that generated poly, I get really huge sec/rel times (like 2 to 5 sec/rel). What am I forgetting? This is with the 64-bit GGNFS sievers.

Last fiddled with by wombatman on 2014-02-13 at 05:01
wombatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passive Pascal Xyzzy GPU Computing 1 2017-05-17 20:22
Tesla P100 — 5.4 DP TeraFLOPS — Pascal Mark Rose GPU Computing 52 2016-07-02 12:11
Nvidia Pascal, a third of DP firejuggler GPU Computing 12 2016-02-23 06:55
Calculating perfect numbers in Pascal Elhueno Homework Help 5 2008-06-12 16:37
Factorization attempt to a c163 - a new Odd Perfect Number roadblock jchein1 Factoring 30 2005-05-30 14:43

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:53.

Tue Dec 1 18:53:10 UTC 2020 up 82 days, 16:04, 2 users, load averages: 1.56, 1.59, 1.82

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.