![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
350710 Posts |
![]()
I, by total accident, saw a video on Youtube about a possible proof of the abc conjecture. I never knew it before, but the guy claimed that people originally thought the solution to Fermat's Last Theorem was to prove the abc conjecture and apply that solution to Fermat's Last Theorem. I probably phrased that badly, but...
If anybody knows what the connection is between the abc conjecture and Fermat's Last Theorem, could this proof, if it truly is a proof, affect the effectiveness of primality tests, or maybe even come up with a new way of doing things faster? I know that there are quite a few trolls on here that will say,"Sure, anything's POSSIBLE, trololol." But it does make me wonder. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
11100001101012 Posts |
![]()
http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=17171
Fermat's Last Theorem is a consequence of the abc conjecture. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Aug 2006
135448 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Jason Goatcher"
Mar 2005
DB316 Posts |
![]()
If it is confirmed to be a proof, won't it affect our ability to find titanic primes? Are there methods out there that aren't used simply because they haven't been rigorously proven?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conjecture pertaining to modified Fermat's theorem | devarajkandadai | Number Theory Discussion Group | 12 | 2017-12-25 05:43 |
Modified Fermat's theorem | devarajkandadai | Number Theory Discussion Group | 14 | 2017-11-12 20:04 |
Fermat's Theorem-tip of the iceberg? | devarajkandadai | Miscellaneous Math | 2 | 2006-06-16 08:50 |
Fermat's Theorem | Crook | Math | 5 | 2005-05-05 17:18 |
Fermat,s Theorem | devarajkandadai | Miscellaneous Math | 3 | 2004-06-05 10:15 |