Non 15k to 1M anyone? - Page 2

SB2 · 2004-04-07, 10:57

If it is alright with all concerned I would like to test these two numbers;

10346561
10598947

Citrix · 2004-05-01, 21:47

Is any one interested in low weight k's (wt<32). I have put together a webpage to coordinate such a search. If there is enough interest I can make the webpage public.

There are basically 263 k's and the aim will be too bring them all to 1M.

Let me know if you are interested.

Citrix

VBCurtis · 2005-04-27, 20:49

Are these 263 low-weight numbers the ones on the 15k.org site now? I'm working on a bunch of numbers from the site, probably to 1 million. Citrix, did you ever get that page going, if your list is separate from the 15k.org list?
-Curtis

2004-04-07, 10:57	#12
SB2 Jul 2003 2·3·19 Posts	If it is alright with all concerned I would like to test these two numbers; 10346561 10598947

2004-05-01, 21:47	#13
Citrix Jun 2003 2²×397 Posts	Is any one interested in low weight k's (wt<32). I have put together a webpage to coordinate such a search. If there is enough interest I can make the webpage public. There are basically 263 k's and the aim will be too bring them all to 1M. Let me know if you are interested. Citrix

2005-04-27, 20:49	#14
VBCurtis "Curtis" Feb 2005 Riverside, CA 1010011010100₂ Posts	Are these 263 low-weight numbers the ones on the 15k.org site now? I'm working on a bunch of numbers from the site, probably to 1 million. Citrix, did you ever get that page going, if your list is separate from the 15k.org list? -Curtis