mersenneforum.org A tentative question
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2020-07-10, 04:26 #1 devarajkandadai     May 2004 31610 Posts A tentative question There seems to be no non-residues higher than quadratic order;is this related to Fermat's last theorem? Last fiddled with by devarajkandadai on 2020-07-10 at 04:37
 2020-07-10, 13:01 #2 Happy5214     "Alexander" Nov 2008 The Alamo City 32·72 Posts If I'm understanding you right, you're saying there are no, say, cubic non-residues. Well 4 is a cubic non-residue modulo 7 (there is no x where x^3=4 (mod 7)).
2020-07-10, 14:02   #3
R.D. Silverman

Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Happy5214 If I'm understanding you right, you're saying there are no, say, cubic non-residues. Well 4 is a cubic non-residue modulo 7 (there is no x where x^3=4 (mod 7)).
Exercise for the O.P.

If p = 1 mod 6, how many cubic residues does it have? how many non-residues?
What about p = -1 mod 6? Did you bother at all to even try to answer your own question?

Do us all a favor. Don't come back until you take the time to actually do some reading
about this subject. And if you can't be bothered, then don't come back at all.

Your question could have been answered with 15 seconds of thought. But of course
you could not be bothered.

2020-07-10, 14:07   #4
retina
Undefined

"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

22·32·167 Posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Happy5214 If I'm understanding you right, you're saying there are no, say, cubic non-residues. Well 4 is a cubic non-residue modulo 7 (there is no x where x^3=4 (mod 7)).
Exercise for the O.P.

If p = 1 mod 6, how many cubic residues does it have? how many non-residues?
What about p = -1 mod 6? Did you bother at all to even try to answer your own question?

Do us all a favor. Don't come back until you take the time to actually do some reading
about this subject. And if you can't be bothered, then don't come back at all.

Your question could have been answered with 15 seconds of thought. But of course
you could not be bothered.
I think you quoted the wrong person.

2020-07-10, 15:13   #5
R.D. Silverman

Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by retina I think you quoted the wrong person.
Huh? I did not quote anyone. I simply made a follow-on post. My post was addressed
to the O.P.

2020-07-10, 16:34   #6
xilman
Bamboozled!

"πΊππ·π·π­"
May 2003
Down not across

17×619 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman Huh? I did not quote anyone. I simply made a follow-on post. My post was addressed to the O.P.
You quoted Happy5214 in the same way I'm quoting you.

You clicked on the "Quote" button, not the "Post Reply" button.

Technical point in that your text clearly addressed the OP, not the person you quoted in the technical sense.

Last fiddled with by xilman on 2020-07-10 at 16:34

2020-07-10, 22:38   #7
R.D. Silverman

Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by xilman You quoted Happy5214 in the same way I'm quoting you. You clicked on the "Quote" button, not the "Post Reply" button. Technical point in that your text clearly addressed the OP, not the person you quoted in the technical sense.
Point taken. This has become an interesting debate over the word "quote".

What I wrote was a follow-on. It was suggested by Happy5214 that the O.P. check whether
4 mod 7 was a cubic residue. I simply extended this to other primes that were:
firstly 1 Mod 6 (as 7 is) and then to all other primes. [And added some admonishment.]

From now on I will try to use the "post reply" button instead of "quote" to avoid confusion when I do not
intend to quote anything.

Last fiddled with by R.D. Silverman on 2020-07-10 at 22:45 Reason: some word changes

2020-07-10, 22:45   #8
retina
Undefined

"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

601210 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman This has become an interesting debate over the word "quote".
I have copied (some of) your text and placed into a box above. That is a quote of what you said. You didn't write my post, I wrote it, so I quoted you.

2020-07-10, 23:58   #9
mathwiz

Mar 2019

11·13 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman Do us all a favor. Don't come back until you take the time to actually do some reading about this subject. And if you can't be bothered, then don't come back at all. Your question could have been answered with 15 seconds of thought. But of course you could not be bothered.
I am quoting R.D. Silverman, but addressing the moderators here:

Why is this sort of rude, insulting tone permitted on the forums? Certainly this vitriol and condescension discourages people from asking questions and thereby learning. Even if the answers may be trivially obvious to Mr. Silverman, they are not to others.

2020-07-11, 00:51   #10
R.D. Silverman

Nov 2003

22·5·373 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by mathwiz I am quoting R.D. Silverman, but addressing the moderators here: Why is this sort of rude, insulting tone permitted on the forums? Certainly this vitriol and condescension discourages people from asking questions and thereby learning. Even if the answers may be trivially obvious to Mr. Silverman, they are not to others.
The O.P. has a very long history of crank and nonsensical posts combined with
a proven unwillingness to spend time learning anything about the subject. He also
fails to respond to questions posed to him.

Anyone who wants to ask questions needs to show that they have made at least a
minimal effort to answer the question for themselves. To do so otherwise is rude
in and of itself because it places a time requirement on others. Even a cursory
web search by the O.P. would have revealed the answer. Teachers should not
have to waste their time with students who are unwilling to do basic homework.

2020-07-11, 00:52   #11
Batalov

"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

5×17×109 Posts
Eh... There is a button for that.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by mathwiz I am quoting R.D. Silverman, but addressing the moderators here: Why is this sort of rude, insulting tone permitted on the forums?.
As a purely gedanken experiment, I might submit that the opposite is also true:

Quote:
 The comments like that (a comment from someone who has nothing for or against the argument and only stopped by to criticise the tone of voice in which two members who know each other for 10+ years talk to each other) - that discourages qualified answers. people who know the answers stop answering because someone will "report them", so they just stop. And then forum fills up with very helpful and kind answers from folks who don't know the answer and don't even know how to learn the answer.

 Thread Tools

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post devarajkandadai Number Theory Discussion Group 24 2018-10-29 19:34 devarajkandadai Number Theory Discussion Group 10 2018-07-22 05:38

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:34.

Tue Jan 26 22:34:37 UTC 2021 up 54 days, 18:45, 0 users, load averages: 2.44, 2.28, 2.55

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.