|
2016-11-14, 14:19
|
#1 |
|
Nov 2016
2·3 Posts |
LL first test shows 4 days to complete.
Here is the exponent link:
http://www.mersenne.org/report_expon...8976087&full=1 So I started it yesterday (13th) and it originally said Dec 8 to finish, now it says Nov 26. Prime95 program shows 3 days 16hrs. Why the difference? Thanks. |
|
|
|
2016-11-14, 15:52
|
#2 |
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
22×773 Posts |
Prime95 is good at estimating how fast an exponent will go once it starts, assuming it has full use of the CPU. It multiplies that by the number of hours per day you told it it would run, and then estimates the completion time. Every time Prime95 communicates with PrimeNet it will update the estimated completion time. Things like thermal throttling, running other programs, and running Prime95 a different number of hours per day will change the estimated completion time.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-14, 16:30
|
#3 |
|
Nov 2016
2×3 Posts |
Ok, yeah the estimated days to completion just dropped another day, probably keep dropping today as it meets up with what prime95 is showing.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do LL test get GHz-days | wildrabbitt | PrimeNet | 1 | 2017-05-26 16:15 |
| Prime95 shows strange timings after upgrade to Mavericks | ixfd64 | Software | 7 | 2014-05-10 17:51 |
| Question about Estimated Days to Complete | Mark Rose | GPU to 72 | 5 | 2013-10-04 06:12 |
| Memtest86+ shows no errors but computer crashes with Prime95 | TObject | Hardware | 11 | 2013-05-09 11:43 |
| I've chosen primality test task, but info shows P-1 factoring! Why ? | Unregistered | Software | 3 | 2004-02-23 16:45 |
