Reserved for MF - Sequence 3408 - Page 3

Andi_HB · 2013-08-07, 08:51

1750 @ 3e6 are done - no factor

RichD · 2013-08-07, 14:43

Passing through.

2500 @ 11e6 - done
860 @ 43e6

RichD · 2013-08-08, 01:32

I'm passing through

1800 @ 43e6

EdH · 2013-08-08, 03:25

Add in 1490 more @11e6

EdH · 2013-08-08, 23:46

Code:

math55@math55:~/Math/ecmWork$ python ecm.py -threads 2 -c 2000 43000000 <ecmTest
-> ___________________________________________________________________
-> | Running ecm.py, a Python driver for distributing GMP-ECM work   |
-> | on a single machine.  It is Copyright, 2012, David Cleaver and  |
-> | is a conversion of factmsieve.py that is Copyright, 2010, Brian |
-> | Gladman.   Version 0.10 (Python 2.6 or later) 30th Sep 2012.    |
-> |_________________________________________________________________|
 
-> Number(s) to factor:
-> 158562617349742945209675705641056807898933509464973267150675418846057564672877363454894115116065225867039062557863618865761425909629304410855170704171 (150 digits)
->=============================================================================
-> Working on number: 158562617349742945...304410855170704171 (150 digits)
-> Currently working on: job0685.txt
-> Starting 2 instances of GMP-ECM...
-> ./ecm -c 1000 43000000 < job0685.txt > job0685_t00.txt
-> ./ecm -c 1000 43000000 < job0685.txt > job0685_t01.txt
 
GMP-ECM 6.4.4 [configured with GMP 5.1.2, --enable-asm-redc] [ECM]
Using B1=43000000, B2=240490660426, polynomial Dickson(12), 2 threads
Done 197/2000; avg s/curve: stg1 148.2s, stg2 43.34s; runtime: 18935s

Run 197 out of 2000:
Using B1=43000000, B2=240490660426, polynomial Dickson(12), sigma=354488151
Step 1 took 147205ms
Step 2 took 43231ms
********** Factor found in step 2: 36471335428481436387054163147551565208686210066640946173017
Found probable prime factor of 59 digits: 36471335428481436387054163147551565208686210066640946173017
Probable prime cofactor 4347595597662628436638238052393245639270024035804982296756254715893080250256191319569347363 has 91 digits
 
math55@math55:~/Math/ecmWork$

RichD · 2013-08-08, 23:51

Wow! A p59 at t50!!

As I was closing in on 4000 @ 43e6.

RichD · 2013-08-09, 18:29

1000 @ 3e6 - nothing
passing through 500 @ 11e6

Edit: and -pm1 2e9

RichD · 2013-08-10, 06:00

2850 @ 11e6 - nothing
Passing through 50 @ 43e6

BTW, I intentionally don't complete a level incase others are working it and haven't reported their work. Backfilling can always be done at the end before starting GNFS.

RichD · 2013-08-11, 20:15

1300 @ 43e6 - nothing.

RichD · 2013-08-13, 02:06

Getting back into this one after needing all cores for an NFS job.

Passing through 800 @ 43e6
(Total of 2100 so far by me.)

VBCurtis · 2013-08-13, 04:18

Does the plan call for a full t50 for this one?
Rephrased: What ratio of ECM-test to digit-length is standard around here?

I don't have threads to spare for a few days, so firejuggler might have to poly-select this one too.

2013-08-09, 18:29	#29
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 2³·5·89 Posts	c155 @ i1311 1000 @ 3e6 - nothing passing through 500 @ 11e6 Edit: and -pm1 2e9 Last fiddled with by RichD on 2013-08-09 at 18:38

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Reserved for MF - Sequence 3366	RichD	Aliquot Sequences	535	2021-12-04 01:13
Reserved for MF - Sequence 4788	schickel	Aliquot Sequences	3149	2021-12-01 00:06
Reserved for MF - Sequence 276	kar_bon	Aliquot Sequences	136	2021-10-21 16:17
Team Sieve #37: 3408:i1287	RichD	Aliquot Sequences	14	2013-08-02 17:02
80M to 64 bits ... but not really reserved	petrw1	Lone Mersenne Hunters	82	2010-01-11 01:57

2013-08-07, 08:51	#23
Andi_HB Mar 2007 Germany 2³·3·11 Posts	1750 @ 3e6 are done - no factor

2013-08-07, 14:43	#24
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 110111101000₂ Posts	Passing through. 2500 @ 11e6 - done 860 @ 43e6

2013-08-08, 01:32	#25
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas DE8₁₆ Posts	I'm passing through 1800 @ 43e6

2013-08-08, 03:25	#26
EdH "Ed Hall" Dec 2009 Adirondack Mtns 10626₈ Posts	Add in 1490 more @11e6

2013-08-08, 23:51	#28
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 2³×5×89 Posts	Wow! A p59 at t50!! As I was closing in on 4000 @ 43e6.

2013-08-10, 06:00	#30
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 110111101000₂ Posts	2850 @ 11e6 - nothing Passing through 50 @ 43e6 BTW, I intentionally don't complete a level incase others are working it and haven't reported their work. Backfilling can always be done at the end before starting GNFS.

2013-08-11, 20:15	#31
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 3560₁₀ Posts	1300 @ 43e6 - nothing.

2013-08-13, 02:06	#32
RichD Sep 2008 Kansas 2³·5·89 Posts	Getting back into this one after needing all cores for an NFS job. Passing through 800 @ 43e6 (Total of 2100 so far by me.)

2013-08-13, 04:18	#33
VBCurtis "Curtis" Feb 2005 Riverside, CA 2²×1,319 Posts	Does the plan call for a full t50 for this one? Rephrased: What ratio of ECM-test to digit-length is standard around here? I don't have threads to spare for a few days, so firejuggler might have to poly-select this one too.