20191010, 22:20  #1 
"mrh"
Oct 2018
Temecula, ca
5A_{16} Posts 
Factoring M7777171
I'd like to factor 7777171, for no particular reason, other than I like the way it looks.
I threw some time at it, but it resists. What do you think would be best to try next? Just a bunch of ECM curves? Last fiddled with by mrh on 20191010 at 22:41 
20191010, 23:01  #2 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
5^{2}×211 Posts 
Yes. You've done a lot of TF AND PM1.

20191010, 23:05  #3 
"mrh"
Oct 2018
Temecula, ca
2×3^{2}×5 Posts 

20191010, 23:12  #4 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
5^{2}×211 Posts 
https://www.mersenne.org/report_ecm/...1&ecm_hi=15000
Tells you how much is done/ remaining at each digit level. I'd start with the lowest.: 50,000 (B2= 10x B1). Run as many curves as you like. 
20191010, 23:28  #5 
Sep 2003
5035_{8} Posts 

20191011, 00:03  #6 
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
149B_{16} Posts 

20200909, 19:37  #7 
Nov 2014
100111_{2} Posts 
Factoring M20825573
I'm doing something similiar at the moment: Trying to find a factor for M20825573 in order to make up for my bad DC 11 years ago (which was one of my very first tests!).
I assume ECM is the way to go from now? Or should I increase P1 again? Currently I'm running another ECM curve with B1=250000, B2=100*B1 and TF up to 75bits with mfaktc. However they take around 6 hours one, this is so long ... I might never find a factor :*( 
20200909, 20:28  #8  
Jul 2003
Behind BB
2·983 Posts 
Quote:
1) Finish the TF to 75 bits  you'll have then put about 300 GPU GhzDays into TF. 2) One more P1 attempt: B1 = 7,000,000, B2 = 200,000,000. 3) Complete the recommended set of 280 ECM curves at B1=50,000, B2 = 5,000,000. Steps 2 and 3 are about 300 CPU GhzDays. Note that each ECM curve gives you an independent chance of finding a factor. There's no point in increasing B1,B2 for ECM until you complete the recommended set of curves at the 25 digit level. I estimate that steps 2 and 3 represent about 2 weeks of work for my Haswell i5 cpu. That's a lot of work to dedicate to one exponent. A quixotic quest, but one that I hope is fruitful for you. 

20200910, 10:03  #9  
Nov 2014
3·13 Posts 
Quote:
Also, it is the only exponent showing up as "bad" in my lifetime statistic. Previously there was also M21717953 in it, which I was able to move to the category "Factor found later" with P1. I probably won't do complete t25, but maybe 100 curves or so. Last fiddled with by gLauss on 20200910 at 10:08 

20201019, 15:28  #10 
Nov 2014
3×13 Posts 

20201019, 16:55  #11  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
3^{2}×5^{4} Posts 
Quote:
Curves at B1=50k could still find a factor, but B1=250k will have more than 5x the chance per curve (while taking about 5x as long, so oddsperday improve). 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
OpenCL GPU P1 Factoring and ECM Factoring  xx005fs  GPU Computing  3  20181027 14:49 