![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2·3·1,693 Posts |
![]() Code:
Sending result to server: UID: flashjh/P1Main, M51879281 completed P-1, B1=505000, B2=10352500, E=12, We4: 3E947A63 Last fiddled with by kladner on 2012-01-24 at 14:37 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2×3×1,693 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
1,123 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Last fiddled with by flashjh on 2012-01-25 at 05:00 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
2·3·1,693 Posts |
![]()
Wow! That certainly differs from my circumstances! It gives me a better understanding of how P95 works in the P-1 realm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3·29·83 Posts |
![]()
In my experience, with 'vanilla' P-1 assignments via PrimeNet or GPU272, in stage two there are ~400 relative primes, and for those assignments means about ~10 GiB +- 1 would process all at once.
Code:
[Worker #2 Jan 24 22:58:39] Available memory is 3628MB. [Worker #2 Jan 24 22:58:39] Using 3620MB of memory. Processing 143 relative primes (0 of 384 already processed). [Worker #1 Jan 24 22:58:39] Available memory is 4520MB. [Worker #1 Jan 24 22:58:39] Using 4480MB of memory. Processing 41 relative primes (359 of 480 already processed). Code:
[Worker #1 Jan 24 22:58:21] Optimal P-1 factoring of M200000033 using up to 10000MB of memory. [Worker #1 Jan 24 22:58:21] Assuming no factors below 2^77 and 2 primality tests saved if a factor is found. [Worker #1 Jan 24 22:58:21] Optimal bounds are B1=1850000, B2=43937500 [Worker #1 Jan 24 22:58:21] Chance of finding a factor is an estimated 4.47% Code:
[Worker #2 Jan 24 22:58:26] Optimal P-1 factoring of M54654059 using up to 10000MB of memory. [Worker #2 Jan 24 22:58:26] Assuming no factors below 2^72 and 2 primality tests saved if a factor is found. [Worker #2 Jan 24 22:58:26] Optimal bounds are B1=540000, B2=11610000 [Worker #2 Jan 24 22:58:26] Chance of finding a factor is an estimated 4.12% Edit: 64 GiB is a lot of RAM ![]() Last fiddled with by Dubslow on 2012-01-25 at 05:19 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
1,123 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3×29×83 Posts |
![]()
How do you get 900 relative primes then? What's your B2/B1 ratio?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
1,123 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Code:
[Jan 24 22:43] Setting affinity to run worker on logical CPU #9 [Jan 24 22:43] Optimal P-1 factoring of M50521529 using up to 58967MB of memory. [Jan 24 22:43] Assuming no factors below 2^71 and 2 primality tests saved if a factor is found. [Jan 24 22:43] Optimal bounds are B1=525000, B2=11943750 [Jan 24 22:43] Chance of finding a factor is an estimated 4.53% [Jan 24 22:43] Setting affinity to run helper thread 1 on logical CPU #10 [Jan 24 22:43] Setting affinity to run helper thread 2 on logical CPU #11 [Jan 24 22:43] Using Core2 type-3 FFT length 2688K, Pass1=896, Pass2=3K, 4 threads [Jan 24 22:43] Setting affinity to run helper thread 3 on logical CPU #12 [Jan 24 22:44] Available memory is 58967MB. [Jan 24 22:44] Using 20779MB of memory. Processing 960 relative primes (0 of 960 already processed). Edit1: Like I said, I've never run an exponent in the 200,XXX,XXX range, I may reserve one just to see the numbers. Edit2: Just to see I reserved a 400,000,000 exponent. I'll post the stage 2 info when the system gets there. Last fiddled with by flashjh on 2012-01-25 at 06:12 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"Jerry"
Nov 2011
Vancouver, WA
112310 Posts |
![]()
Stage 1, P-1 on my machine for 400000000 exponent is ~6.5 days.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"Kieren"
Jul 2011
In My Own Galaxy!
236568 Posts |
![]()
Thanks for the examples, Dubslow and Jerry. I had wondered about the number of relative primes, too.
I've been running 4 P95 workers, 3 GB day, 5 GB night. RP's are almost always 192. Typical B1=~520,000 and B2=~10,790,000. Yesterday I changed MaxHighMemWorkers from 3 to 2 to see what difference, if any, that makes. I don't think that change has had time to work through, yet. EDIT: The above are all on GPU272 assignments which range from the mid 40M's to the mid-to-upper 50M's. Last fiddled with by kladner on 2012-01-25 at 16:07 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×3×5×373 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Discussion about dates | Flatlander | Twin Prime Search | 12 | 2011-11-17 09:40 |
10,375- LA discussion | Raman | Cunningham Tables | 27 | 2008-12-04 21:17 |
P-1 discussion | AntonVrba | Prime Cullen Prime | 5 | 2007-04-04 04:59 |
factexcl.txt discussion | hhh | Prime Sierpinski Project | 5 | 2006-11-22 17:50 |
New .dat discussion | VJS | Prime Sierpinski Project | 7 | 2006-07-25 14:31 |