![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Apr 2013
7516 Posts |
![]()
Hi,
I just tried to submit a bunch of manual testing results but for most of them I got confusing error messages from the server, like these for M80255597: Processing result: no factor for M80255597 from 2^69 to 2^70 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] Unable to delete assignment ID: F5907E73741C93D31C15B5F88916D8D8 Processing result: no factor for M80255597 from 2^70 to 2^71 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] Error code: 40, error text: TF result for M80255597 was not needed Processing result: no factor for M80255597 from 2^71 to 2^72 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] Error code: 40, error text: TF result for M80255597 was not needed Processing result: no factor for M80255597 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] Error code: 40, error text: TF result for M80255597 was not needed Doing a database query on the status of M80255597 http://www.mersenne.org/report_expon...&B1=Get+status shows me that everything seems to be ok: Exponent Status Data 80255597 No factors below 2^73 History no factor from 2^64 to 2^65 by "GIMPS Visualization" on 2010-12-06 History no factor for M80255597 from 2^65 to 2^66 [mfaktc 0.16 barrett79_mul32] by "Carsten Kossendey" on 2011-08-11 History no factor from 2^66 to 2^67 by "josibo" on 2013-02-13 History no factor from 2^67 to 2^68 by "josibo" on 2013-02-21 History no factor from 2^68 to 2^69 by "KayJongsma" on 2013-02-23 History no factor for M80255597 from 2^69 to 2^70 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] by "ramgeis" on 2013-06-09 History no factor for M80255597 from 2^70 to 2^71 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] by "ramgeis" on 2013-06-09 History no factor for M80255597 from 2^71 to 2^72 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] by "ramgeis" on 2013-06-09 History no factor for M80255597 from 2^72 to 2^73 [mfaktc 0.20 barrett76_mul32_gs] by "ramgeis" on 2013-06-09 Where is/was the problem? Any idea what happened? Some exponents reported ok though but I don't see the difference... Last fiddled with by ramgeis on 2013-06-09 at 22:48 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"Vincent"
Apr 2010
Over the rainbow
2·3·11·43 Posts |
![]()
primenet consider your extra work as not necessary, but you still got the credit for it, that s all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Apr 2013
11710 Posts |
![]()
That is not what I meant. I can see what the server replied and I know what it means. I should have mentioned that I got the "result not needed" error message also for ranges assigned to me by the server in a quite random way and I didn't see for those which I checked that someone else returned the result. This does not make sense for me. Also for the other exponents in the vicinity of those with the error messages the extra work was as expected no problem, so my question is more like: is everything ok with the server?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Possible error in PRP calculation or server display | alpertron | Software | 4 | 2017-11-08 16:07 |
Is there an FAQ for Error and Warning messages? | Unregistered | Information & Answers | 31 | 2013-01-31 06:13 |
Error Messages from GGNFS | EdH | Factoring | 4 | 2010-01-01 19:52 |
ERROR: Workunit not found on server | Ungelovende | Prime Sierpinski Project | 8 | 2009-09-14 18:00 |
HHCTRL error messages in XP Pro | edron1011 | Software | 0 | 2008-11-21 15:46 |