20210526, 17:09  #463 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
3×13^{2}×19 Posts 
Ok, give me a range. Nice if you have a list, but if not, I will grab the bitlevels from PrimeNet myself. Or... is it ok if I try raising 31.9 to 75? It seems untouched for 30 days.

20210526, 17:25  #464  
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2×2,341 Posts 
Quote:
I'm TFing in the 2x.xM ranges currently so the following are all up for grabs. All of these ranges will eventually need TF75. 35.3 35.1 34.4 33.3 32.7 31.9 31.2 30.8 30.5 The first 3 may need a little bit of TF76 after I P1 them harshly. I plan to have P1 done for these 3x.xM ranges by the end of the year. If you ever feel like helping with P1 let me know. Thanks, Grasshopper 

20210526, 18:00  #465 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
10010110100001_{2} Posts 
Raising a 31.9M to 75 takes 41 minutes on a V100 (colab) and
For P1, what ranges do you have in mind, and what percents of chances, assuming I can find the hardware and mood? (Just asking) Edit, ok, Chris "convinced", it seems it is as easy as going to your notebook access keys table and select "DC Already Done" in the second column, than 26M to 71 and 72 start coming. For the local, we will kick Misfit. We are set. Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20210526 at 19:08 
20210526, 19:28  #466  
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2·2,341 Posts 
Quote:
Your choice whether you work on 31.9 or what Chris can feed you. If you feel compelled to P1 I'm doing 4.5 to 5.2% (+3.2 to +3.8%) in the 3x.xM. I'm using B1/B2 of 1M/30M to 1.5M/45M. 

20210526, 19:29  #467  
If I May
"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002
Barbados
2×11×443 Posts 
Quote:
I see three machines using the GPU72 Colab API. Two without trickery; I'll have to drill down on how you injected the 31.9M to 75 work... And how to get the results to autosubmit without an AID... 

20210527, 02:02  #468  
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
3×13^{2}×19 Posts 
Quote:
Latins use to say, "una hirundo non facit ver" (one swallow doesn't make a spring), to which I would add "modo duo?" (how abut two?). swallow, swallow (haha, no pun intended)  (** the range you assign seems luckier than 31M, hehe, but the real reason is that 26.7M to 72 only takes under 7 minutes per assignment, so 6 of them can be done in the same time one 31.9 to 75 could be done, about) Edit: the 31.9M results stuck in your lobby can be deleted. I reported them manually (copy/paste from your lobby to manual results page). But honestly, you should make the script to report all in the lobby to the server, without parsing keys. If somebody put scrap there, i.e. not TF results, and not primerelated, etc, there are other ways to deal with it (like block the account, ban the user, kick him in the nose, put a finger into his eye, etc). Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20210527 at 02:24 

20210531, 08:37  #470 
"GIMFS"
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
10111000001_{2} Posts 
Currently working in the 15M range, 69 > 70 bits.
Should take a couple of weeks. If someone wants to do some work there, please start from 15.0 so as to avoid any toe stepping (I´m now crunching 15.5 and 15.6 sub ranges and will work my way down). It would be a good thing that Primenet allowed us to reserve exponents for TF in these (say, below 20M or so) ranges. 
20210601, 02:10  #471  
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada
2·2,341 Posts 
Quote:
Thanks again By about midJune I will have also completed all reasonable P1 for 48.4 and 49.6. I am hoping to have both ranges down to 40 or less remaining. The only options will then be TF ... hopefully to 76 bits will do it. Or ECM or P+1 though neither are very efficient for exponents this high Thanks all Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 20210601 at 02:14 

20210601, 06:36  #472  
"Yves"
Jul 2017
Belgium
5·13 Posts 
Quote:
Until now, 5 factors found, 2030 unfactored remaining. 

20210602, 14:57  #473  
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
3×13^{2}×19 Posts 
Quote:
James' site allows x.xxM ranges for smaller exponents (and only xx.x for larger expos). So, following the idea, every x.xxM range (i.e. 10k) should have less than 200 unfactored expos. Arriba, arriba, I went to the site, as deep as possible, until the green row became deeppink row, then moved upward (or rightwards) arrow by arrow. The first outlier was 1.71M, with 201 unfactored, then on the second position came 1.89M with 200 unfactored, so the goal is to find two factors in the first bucket, and one in the second. We raised both ranges one or two bits with TF without luck, then, after a little help from the forum, started playing with P+1 on them ranges. We are DONE with the second half of it. We are still continuing P+1 with the first half. Meantime, we also found like a lot of "swallows" (see above) in 26M range served by Chris, like over 30 factors, from which more than half with colab instances. Related to your wish that we move to P1, we may try to pursue Chris to serve us P1 assignments for our colab instances (and we will take care of the colab side). Maybe that's a good idea, we get rid of the headache with reserving the work, adding it to colab, and reporting the results (right now, manually). 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Thinking of Joining GPU to 72  jschwar313  GPU to 72  3  20160131 00:50 
Thinking about lasieve5  Batalov  Factoring  6  20111227 22:40 
Thinking about buying a panda  jasong  jasong  1  20081111 09:43 
Loud thinking on irregular primes  devarajkandadai  Math  4  20070725 03:01 
Question on unfactored numbers...  WraithX  GMPECM  1  20060319 22:16 