mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Prime Search Projects > Riesel Prime Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-02-09, 23:07   #320
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

2·3·11·19 Posts
Default

k = 10009. Some lightweight results from the start:

Quote:
10009*2^3-1
10009*2^27-1
10009*2^71-1
10009*2^101-1
10009*2^157-1
10009*2^279-1
10009*2^311-1
10009*2^679-1
10009*2^837-1
10009*2^1101-1
10009*2^1569-1
10009*2^2219-1
10009*2^2343-1
10009*2^5527-1
10009*2^7109-1
10009*2^7847-1
10009*2^9797-1
10009*2^25797-1
10009*2^47871-1
10009*2^57271-1
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-10, 03:51   #321
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

100111001102 Posts
Default

k = 10009, n = 192999
Hardware issue forced a stop.
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-10, 07:22   #322
Jean Penné
 
Jean Penné's Avatar
 
May 2004
FRANCE

10578 Posts
Default k=138847

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy5214 View Post
To confirm, does that include the range from n=1283793 to n=10M (which is the earliest progress report you posted)?
Yes, indeed, and I am also sieving the input file, now up to 1.61P

Regards,
Jean
Jean Penné is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-10, 07:34   #323
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

4,217 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
k = 10009. Some lightweight results from the start:
What makes you think k=10009 is a low-weight k value? This is quite a list of primes, if this was indeed a low-weight k.
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-10, 16:43   #324
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

23468 Posts
Default

Another project running on my HP

6001*2^114775-1 is prime! (34555 decimal digits)

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis
What makes you think k=10009 is a low-weight k value? This is quite a list of primes, if this was indeed a low-weight k.
How do you define "low weight?"
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-10, 18:14   #325
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

2·3·11·19 Posts
Default

6001*2^140449-1 is prime! (42284 decimal digits)
6001*2^156555-1 is prime! (47132 decimal digits)
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-10, 23:55   #326
paulunderwood
 
paulunderwood's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr

32×5×73 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
How do you define "low weight?"
Given k, there is a threshold for which the k*2^n-1 numbers left in a sieve is below, given that one has sieved up to some maximum value. Less in the sieve means it is "lighter" and as a result one expects fewer primes. An extreme of weight is a Riesel number which has no weight at all. Sometimes Nash weight is used for weight. Heavy means lots of numbers are left in the sieve and consequently one can expect more primes below a maximum n,

There is a program somewhere on this subforum which calculates weights,
paulunderwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-11, 14:13   #327
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

100111001102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulunderwood View Post
Given k, there is a threshold for which the k*2^n-1 numbers left in a sieve is below, given that one has sieved up to some maximum value. Less in the sieve means it is "lighter" and as a result one expects fewer primes. An extreme of weight is a Riesel number which has no weight at all. Sometimes Nash weight is used for weight. Heavy means lots of numbers are left in the sieve and consequently one can expect more primes below a maximum n,

There is a program somewhere on this subforum which calculates weights,
Got it. Thank you!

I sieved a range of 50,000 possibilities on my HP overnight to 1e12. There were 1,100 remaining this morning.

6001*2^315529-1 is prime! (94988 decimal digits)

I hope someone is recording what folks are turning in here!
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-11, 15:08   #328
VBCurtis
 
VBCurtis's Avatar
 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA

107916 Posts
Default

You've chosen a k value (10009) from a range that nobody is tracking, noted that nobody is tracking it, and posted a bunch of primes of a size that aren't tracked by the top 5000.

If you expect a project to record your work, maybe pick a k value from a range that project cares about? The forum you're posting in, RPS, focuses on k < 300. For historical reasons, it also cares about multiples of 15 even if they're larger than 300 (the project was once called 15k).

No Prime Left Behind focuses on 300 < k < 2000 (I think?).

It should be obvious that you have an unlimited list of k values to choose from, but that doesn't mean someone cares about every possible k. I imagine the prime pages listings might include 6001, but you haven't reached a size that's all that interesting- a day or three of work isn't exactly a massive effort.

Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 2020-02-11 at 15:11
VBCurtis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-11, 15:38   #329
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

2×3×11×19 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
You've chosen a k value (10009) from a range that nobody is tracking, noted that nobody is tracking it, and posted a bunch of primes of a size that aren't tracked by the top 5000.

If you expect a project to record your work, maybe pick a k value from a range that project cares about? The forum you're posting in, RPS, focuses on k < 300. For historical reasons, it also cares about multiples of 15 even if they're larger than 300 (the project was once called 15k).

No Prime Left Behind focuses on 300 < k < 2000 (I think?).

It should be obvious that you have an unlimited list of k values to choose from, but that doesn't mean someone cares about every possible k. I imagine the prime pages listings might include 6001, but you haven't reached a size that's all that interesting- a day or three of work isn't exactly a massive effort.
<300 has been worked heavily. 10009 did not appear in the top 5000 list nor the Riesel and Proth database. The latter is no longer being updated, it would appear.

6001 on my HP did not seem to have much effort put into it, so I picked it up. It also does not appear in the top 5000 list.

Make a suggestion and I will give it a go...
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-02-12, 05:09   #330
Happy5214
 
Happy5214's Avatar
 
"Alexander"
Nov 2008
The Alamo City

3×113 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VBCurtis View Post
What makes you think k=10009 is a low-weight k value? This is quite a list of primes, if this was indeed a low-weight k.
Its Nash weight is 1261, which puts it a bit above what is generally considered low-weight (<1000).

I'll add that all k's between 10k and 100k have been fully tested below n~=1k, and k's between 10k and 15k have been tested to n=20k. The results from those can be found at https://www.rieselprime.de/Data/10e04a.txt.

(After reading the next few posts after a page cutoff...)

The old Riesel database is gradually being replaced with https://www.rieselprime.de/ziki/Riesel_prime_table, which is in a wiki format. https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=89 would be a more appropriate place to post low-priority data, or you could apply for a wiki account at https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=24141 to enter the data yourself.

If you're looking for useful work, you may consider filling in gaps in the data for unreserved k's already in the old or new Riesel DB. Check with https://github.com/happy5214/rps/ to make sure you don't overlap with my work in that area. I also am working on the RPS 9th and 10th Drive k's below n=400k, all Woodall and near Woodall k's > 10k, and all k's between 10k and 15k with missing data, all on local PRPNet servers.

Edit: https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=7213 has the Nash weight calculators alluded to by Paul.

Last fiddled with by Happy5214 on 2020-02-12 at 05:20
Happy5214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TPS stats page Oddball Twin Prime Search 0 2011-10-29 18:34
Full-text stats page ET_ PrimeNet 0 2009-01-10 15:02
odd entry on stats page mdettweiler Prime Sierpinski Project 3 2008-08-27 18:34
Updated Server Stats Page Old man PrimeNet Lounge 15 2003-11-25 02:09
Program version wrong on stats page. Deamiter Software 1 2002-11-09 06:24

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:00.

Tue Jul 14 05:00:21 UTC 2020 up 111 days, 2:33, 0 users, load averages: 1.90, 1.82, 1.87

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.