mersenneforum.org GPU72 Weird stats
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 2015-04-17, 18:05 #1 Gordon     Nov 2008 7658 Posts GPU72 Weird stats Hi, IF I go to the page www.gpu72.com/account then I have apparently found 43 factors in 2,412 DC checks and 77 factors in 5,631 LL checks. On the other hand I go to the Overall Individual Statistics page from the link in the menu in the left that changes to 97 factors in 6,242 DC checks and 23 factors in 1,791 LL checks. They don't even come to the same totals! Which one is correct? I have certainly done a load more DC than LL checks, but is either set of figures correct??
2015-04-17, 20:17   #2
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

29·101 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Gordon Which one is correct? I have certainly done a load more DC than LL checks, but is either set of figures correct??
The graph of work done matches the Individual Overall Statistics numbers for me.

The numbers at /account are incoherent. It shows me having LLTF assignments when I only have DCTF assignments, etc. I suspect it's counting lots of DCTF work done as LLTF work done as well.

2015-04-17, 21:34   #3
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!

"Wayne"
Nov 2006

2·112·19 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Gordon Hi, IF I go to the page www.gpu72.com/account then I have apparently found 43 factors in 2,412 DC checks and 77 factors in 5,631 LL checks. On the other hand I go to the Overall Individual Statistics page from the link in the menu in the left that changes to 97 factors in 6,242 DC checks and 23 factors in 1,791 LL checks. They don't even come to the same totals! Which one is correct? I have certainly done a load more DC than LL checks, but is either set of figures correct??
Same total # of factors....I get the same discrepancy there but same totals

2015-04-18, 22:43   #4
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

24·5·7·17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Gordon They don't even come to the same totals! Which one is correct? I have certainly done a load more DC than LL checks, but is either set of figures correct??
Thanks for pointing that out. Clearly a SPE on my part.

Last fiddled with by chalsall on 2015-04-18 at 22:43 Reason: Cut/Quote error...

2015-05-01, 00:29   #5
Gordon

Nov 2008

3×167 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chalsall Thanks for pointing that out. Clearly a SPE on my part.
It's even more broke now, showing me as having done a P-1 and the other totals are still trash

2015-05-01, 01:11   #6
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

24×5×7×17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Gordon It's even more broke now, showing me as having done a P-1 and the other totals are still trash
Please forgive me for this, but I don't know what GPU72 account you are referring to.

Rather than providing a link to a page which is dependent on log-in credentials (thus, gives no information), could you please provide a public page of your stats, or PM me your GPU72 username (but, importantly, not your password).

The only Gordon I was able to find has done no work. But, as usual, I'm probably wrong....

2015-05-01, 15:53   #7
Gordon

Nov 2008

3·167 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chalsall Please forgive me for this, but I don't know what GPU72 account you are referring to. Rather than providing a link to a page which is dependent on log-in credentials (thus, gives no information), could you please provide a public page of your stats, or PM me your GPU72 username (but, importantly, not your password). The only Gordon I was able to find has done no work. But, as usual, I'm probably wrong....
Okay, let's see if this works

Attached Thumbnails

2015-05-08, 15:37   #8
Gordon

Nov 2008

3×167 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Gordon Okay, let's see if this works screenshot from this page http://www.gpu72.com/account/ is nitro-overview-01 screenshot from this page http://www.gpu72.com/reports/worker/blahblahblah is nitro-stats-01
The stats are STILL wrong, the last two DC factors I found appear in the "account" report as LL factors, the total candidates tested have different totals as does the number of days of work. differs by 11 candidates and 1,346 days of work

If I was creating the report it would simply sum by type, clearly this isn't happening.

So which figures are correct, the "by account", the "overall statistics" or neither?

2015-05-08, 19:55   #9
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

24·5·7·17 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Gordon So which figures are correct, the "by account", the "overall statistics" or neither?
OK... Thanks for the prodding; you have indeed identified bugs in the GPU72 code.

The fundamental issue is I never imagined that GPU72 would last this long, and so stupidly assumed in the SQL queries that DCTF'ing would always be below 40M (this was after DCTF'ing was bolted on as an afterthought, by request). I thought I have fixed all of this a year or so ago, but clearly I missed a bit.

I've updated the code which renders the "real-time" data at https://www.gpu72.com/account/.

Please review this, and let me know if you see any issues. So you (and everyone) knows, the stats for DCTF and LLTF may change (read: be more accurate), but the totals shouldn't chance (beyond what you've completed in the last few hours).

Please further know that a batching script seems to suffer the same bug. This is why some "Rank / Of" cells are wrong. I'll review this this weekend.

 2015-05-08, 20:09 #10 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 29×101 Posts I still see a discrepancy between my Overall Statistics and Account Overview. The Completed and GHz Days columns differ. Code: Overall Statistics Work Type Rank Of Candidates Factors GHz Days Assigned Completed Predicted Found DC TF 2 138 258 50,839 573.651 532 252,408.59 LL TF 23 206 11,933 165.963 164 157,551.39 P-1 64 89 13 Not sure 54.01 Overall 16 224 258 62,785 739.61 696 410,014.01 Account Overview Work Type Rank Of Assigned Completed Facts GHz Days DC TF 0 0 258 61,624 532 301,031.831 LL TF 0 0 12,622 164 178,693.801 P-1 0 0 14 57.461 Total 258 74,260 696 479,783.094 I assume the Rank on the account overview page will update when that job runs. :)
2015-05-09, 22:22   #11
Gordon

Nov 2008

3·167 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chalsall OK... Thanks for the prodding; you have indeed identified bugs in the GPU72 code. The fundamental issue is I never imagined that GPU72 would last this long, and so stupidly assumed in the SQL queries that DCTF'ing would always be below 40M (this was after DCTF'ing was bolted on as an afterthought, by request). I thought I have fixed all of this a year or so ago, but clearly I missed a bit. I've updated the code which renders the "real-time" data at https://www.gpu72.com/account/. Please review this, and let me know if you see any issues. So you (and everyone) knows, the stats for DCTF and LLTF may change (read: be more accurate), but the totals shouldn't chance (beyond what you've completed in the last few hours). Please further know that a batching script seems to suffer the same bug. This is why some "Rank / Of" cells are wrong. I'll review this this weekend.
The DC totals are correct, but the LL ones are out by 10 tests and the 1346 days still. The "account" version still has me down for a P-1...all my work of that type is on the CPU.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Gordon GPU to 72 5 2015-01-01 23:41 Chuck GPU to 72 51 2014-09-16 12:49 Uncwilly GPU to 72 16 2014-04-11 11:31 swl551 GPU to 72 1 2013-01-11 12:54 opyrt Prime Sierpinski Project 3 2010-05-31 08:13

All times are UTC. The time now is 18:47.

Sun Apr 11 18:47:48 UTC 2021 up 3 days, 13:28, 1 user, load averages: 2.00, 1.96, 1.90