mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-01-09, 14:52   #1
gjmccrac
 
gjmccrac's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Ontario, Canada

12910 Posts
Default No Exponents returned for TF to Low Limits

I have a machine the is doing TF-LMH (low limits).

It has been attempting to get new assignments and gets the following error message back.

Code:
No data record of requested type
It seems that once the TF-LMH wave front went into the 600M range it is not working anymore. The recent results report does not seem to show anything being reported for the 600M range.

Grant.
gjmccrac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-09, 16:27   #2
Rodrigo
 
Rodrigo's Avatar
 
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania

32×103 Posts
Default

I'm having a similar problem with two machines doing TF. For the past 24 hours (maybe longer), every 70 minutes when they go to obtain a new assignment, they've been getting a "CURL library error: Operation timed out after 180 seconds with 0 bytes received".

The highest exponent each machine has is at the 581xxxxxx level, so this jibes with gjmccrac's experience.

Rodrigo
Rodrigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-09, 17:15   #3
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

10001010010102 Posts
Default

Only one person seems to be working on and/or getting assignments in the 600M/800M ranges. LingUaan.

He does NOT have them all reserved.

Note: I am not suggesting or accusing anyone of anything; just stating observations.

Last fiddled with by petrw1 on 2012-01-09 at 17:16
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-09, 19:50   #4
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

160358 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodrigo View Post
I'm having a similar problem with two machines doing TF. For the past 24 hours (maybe longer), every 70 minutes when they go to obtain a new assignment, they've been getting a "CURL library error: Operation timed out after 180 seconds with 0 bytes received".

The highest exponent each machine has is at the 581xxxxxx level, so this jibes with gjmccrac's experience.

Rodrigo
I experienced something similar, once, yesterday. It worked fine an hour afterwards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gjmccrac View Post
I have a machine the is doing TF-LMH (low limits).

It has been attempting to get new assignments and gets the following error message back.

Code:
No data record of requested type
It seems that once the TF-LMH wave front went into the 600M range it is not working anymore. The recent results report does not seem to show anything being reported for the 600M range.

Grant.
This is definitely something wrong on PrimeNet's end. Perhaps try manually reserving some assignments? Both in the same range and in other ranges and see if that works.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-09, 20:37   #5
gjmccrac
 
gjmccrac's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Ontario, Canada

3·43 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
I experienced something similar, once, yesterday. It worked fine an hour afterwards.

This is definitely something wrong on PrimeNet's end. Perhaps try manually reserving some assignments? Both in the same range and in other ranges and see if that works.
I did manually assign exponents in order to fill the work queue on the machine. I believe that there is a Primenet issue with TF-LMH.
gjmccrac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-09, 22:32   #6
Rodrigo
 
Rodrigo's Avatar
 
Jun 2010
Pennsylvania

32·103 Posts
Default

Neither TF machine is still receiving any new assignments this afternoon.

None of my systems is having problems reporting results.

Rodrigo
Rodrigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-09, 22:40   #7
diamonddave
 
diamonddave's Avatar
 
Feb 2004

101000002 Posts
Default

Maybe the constant

Code:
#define MAX_PRIME_SSE2	596000000L	/* SSE2 bit limit */
Is used and shouldn't?

Anyone has an old version of Prime95 (pre SSE2) an could test if the new version introduced the problem?

Couldn't find a version pre 25. Version 25 didn't work either

Last fiddled with by diamonddave on 2012-01-09 at 22:56
diamonddave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-09, 23:00   #8
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

2·2,213 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
Maybe the constant

Code:
#define MAX_PRIME_SSE2	596000000L	/* SSE2 bit limit */
Is used and shouldn't?

Anyone has an old version of Prime95 (pre SSE2) an could test if the new version introduced the problem?

Couldn't find a version pre 25. Version 25 didn't work either
All I could add is that when TF-LMH completed 64 bits about 16 months ago it had no problem going all the way to 999M....well actually I can't for sure recall if this higher range wasn't done manually by CHALSALL, MONST, LINDEx, et al.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-09, 23:09   #9
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

3·2,399 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diamonddave View Post
Maybe the constant

Code:
#define MAX_PRIME_SSE2	596000000L	/* SSE2 bit limit */
Is used and shouldn't?

Anyone has an old version of Prime95 (pre SSE2) an could test if the new version introduced the problem?

Couldn't find a version pre 25. Version 25 didn't work either
That's the limit for FFT size, as used for P-1 and LL. TF does not use FFTs, and in fact TF by Prime95 has been done on >999M exponents (with varying to little success). Either way, that's not the issue. PrimeNet refuses to assign work, not Prime95 refuses to do work.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-10, 00:43   #10
diamonddave
 
diamonddave's Avatar
 
Feb 2004

25·5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petrw1 View Post
All I could add is that when TF-LMH completed 64 bits about 16 months ago it had no problem going all the way to 999M....well actually I can't for sure recall if this higher range wasn't done manually by CHALSALL, MONST, LINDEx, et al.
I could find an old v24 version and it didn't have TF-LMH worktype
diamonddave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-01-10, 01:42   #11
petrw1
1976 Toyota Corona years forever!
 
petrw1's Avatar
 
"Wayne"
Nov 2006
Saskatchewan, Canada

2×2,213 Posts
Default

I think there is more to it...

If there was something stopping TF-LMH from handing out over 599M then it would be handing out the next bit level back at 100M.

But there are none there either.
petrw1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ERROR: cudaGetLastError() returned 4: unspecified launch failure MacFactor GPU Computing 0 2017-12-22 16:04
Error returned on P95 submission kladner PrimeNet 4 2017-09-30 19:49
P-1 limits? nucleon Hardware 8 2015-04-25 23:01
ERROR: cudaGetLastError() returned 30: unknown error garo GPU Computing 10 2013-04-27 19:01
GenefX64 limits siegert81 Miscellaneous Math 2 2011-02-17 13:37

All times are UTC. The time now is 13:06.

Tue Oct 27 13:06:19 UTC 2020 up 47 days, 10:17, 0 users, load averages: 2.68, 2.90, 2.74

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.