![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
329010 Posts |
![]()
I've been trawling through the data and testing some exponents that have failed to get a pair of matching residues after several different tests.
It's been going well and I've knocked out quite a few of these where 3 or more tests failed to produce a successful double-check. But now I'm at a point where I still have 2 for now where my test managed to add yet another unmatched residue. Rather than do another double-check of my own (from a different machine), I wondered if any of you would be able to help me test a couple. If you do, just reply here and let people know you're doing it. I'll be curious to know if my runs matched... so far I haven't had problems. ![]() 38419327 47540719 By the way, on that first one, you'll see a pair of residues that actually do match, but they're not counted because they had the same shift count... it had something to do with how the v4 data was migrated to v5 back when, I guess. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Feb 2010
Sweden
AD16 Posts |
![]()
Could we try to factor such cases, or that is not according to the rules of the game?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
2·5·7·47 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() FYI, I just realized that first one seems to be assigned to someone currently (it wasn't when I ran my test but I guess it got assigned between then and when I checked the result in today). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Mar 2014
Germany
23·3·5 Posts |
![]()
I am currently factoring the second candidate - I will tell you here when that job is finished.
Edit: no Factor to 2^72 - feel free to do an LL test whoever wants Last fiddled with by manfred4 on 2015-03-13 at 23:25 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands
49816 Posts |
![]() Code:
[Sat Mar 14 03:07:43 2015] UID: VictordeHollander/PCVICTOR, M38419327 has a factor: 5527974754269440440249 [TF:72:73:mfakto 0.14-Win cl_barrett15_73_gs_2] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Serpentine Vermin Jar
Jul 2014
2×5×7×47 Posts |
![]() Quote:
I might have access to some nice multicore servers, but I don't have any GPUs to do fast factoring so it never crossed my mind to try that approach on these tricky ones before doing a full LL test. Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2015-03-14 at 08:50 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Aug 2002
Rovereto (Italy)
100111112 Posts |
![]()
I'd be glad to do a n-chek on the second exp.. It will take 4/5 days roughly... But, as you pointed out, it's already assigned to "Sergey Nosov"... I'll do it, but want to be fair, so... Waitin' for a hint.
Regards |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
7×467 Posts |
![]()
Unless you are able to contact Sergey Nosov and arrange things, I don't think you can ethically do that work (unless and until the assignment completes or expires).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal
23·181 Posts |
![]()
+1.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Feb 2010
Sweden
173 Posts |
![]() Quote:
@Madpoo: I would suggest that you give us a list of such problematic exponents. I think that the most of them can be factored in reasonable time. 38419327 was easier to factor, than to verify by LL-test. How many suspected cases you have? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
3,037 Posts |
![]() Quote:
http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=17108 Back then no one was interested or seemed to think it was important, so I stopped checking at 20M. Post #13 has the remaining numbers I planned to work on up to 25M divided into 3 categories. I was concerned with results where both initial LL and double check was run by the same user and specifically those on the same computer. Maybe you can check in the database that they were actually run with different shift counts and they are ok, but I still feel different users/computers should double check. Last fiddled with by ATH on 2015-03-14 at 16:06 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Double checks | casmith789 | PrimeNet | 7 | 2015-05-26 00:53 |
Double-checks under M24xxxxxx | DW52 | PrimeNet | 7 | 2011-04-07 04:47 |
Double checks | Rastus | Data | 1 | 2003-12-19 18:20 |
How do I get rid of the Triple Checks?? | outlnder | Lounge | 4 | 2003-04-07 18:06 |
Double-checks come in pairs? | BigRed | Software | 1 | 2002-10-20 05:29 |