20200318, 14:35  #45  
Nov 2003
1D24_{16} Posts 
Quote:
When you say "consequently", the obvious reply is "consequently to what?". State mathematically what condition you mean. Math is not "casual English". Do you not know what "order of an element [in a group]" means? It is a fundamental concept that you need to learn. And you also need to learn Lagrange's Theorem if you want to continue further. 

20200318, 14:47  #46  
Nov 2003
1D24_{16} Posts 
Quote:
incorrect mathematical statements. 

20200318, 15:04  #47 
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
5,741 Posts 
In the spirit of this thread I also want to write an HLL version of the the LL test. Why not? Following is some awesome python code. And as a bonus it also does a PRP test.
Code:
for p in range(3, 1280, 2): mp, s = pow(2, p)  1, 4 for i in range(2, p): s = (s * s  2) % mp if s == 0: print("2^{}1 is prime".format(p)) if pow(3, mp + 1, mp) == 9: print("2^{}1 is PRP".format(p)) 
20200318, 15:41  #48  
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
110101010110_{2} Posts 
Quote:


20200318, 15:58  #49  
Nov 2017
Karlsruhe, Germany
11111_{2} Posts 
Quote:
\(S \left( 1 \right) = 4 \\ S \left( n + 1 \right) = {S \left( n \right)}^2  2 \\ M_p = 2^p  1 \\ n < p, n \in \mathbb{N}, p \in \mathbb{P}\) 

20200318, 17:19  #50  
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
2·3·569 Posts 
Quote:
If S_k^22 == 1 mod M_p would imply S_k^2 == 3 mod M_p, but 3 is a QNR over M_p for all prime p>2. Proof? Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 20200318 at 17:23 

20200318, 17:23  #51 
Bamboozled!
"πΊππ·π·π"
May 2003
Down not across
24031_{8} Posts 
One error you have just made is to ignore the second and third options in my list. To jog your memory they werre "naivety" and "whatever".
Naivety is both inevitable and forgivable^{*}; everyone is naive in any specific field until they learn not to be. Your naivety (in my opinion, others may differ) is in assuming that mathematicians invariably tolerate sloppy language when used to describe a problem which can be described precisely. Inherent in that sloppiness is a failure to distinguish clearly between the result of operators in programming languages and the mathematical concept of an equivalence class. "Whatever" is harder to characterize. One thing in your favour is your adherence to one of the laws of optimization: First get it right, then get it fast. Perhaps if you had stated this upfront your post may have had a different outcome. Very likely so. Not everyone is polite.  * I've been getting all sorts of since I joined Twitter because my Asperger's makes it difficult for me to read subtexts in tweets from neurotypicals. I have been trying hard to learn and I believe that I'm improving but it still trips me up all too often. 
20200318, 17:59  #52 
Nov 2003
2^{2}×5×373 Posts 
Not if M_p is prime. If M_p is composite then 4 can generate a subgroup.

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Modifying the Lucas Lehmer Primality Test into a fast test of nothing  Trilo  Miscellaneous Math  25  20180311 23:20 
A second proof for the LucasLehmer Test  carpetpool  Miscellaneous Math  2  20170730 09:21 
LucasLehmer test  Mathsgirl  Information & Answers  23  20141210 16:25 
LucasLehmer Test  storm5510  Math  22  20090924 22:32 
Lucas Lehmer test question?  BMgf  Programming  23  20031209 08:52 