mersenneforum.org I found the next big prime number. How do I get my reward
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2020-06-20, 17:46   #12
paulunderwood

Sep 2002
Database er0rr

3×52×72 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Parlak67 Please document how you found the factor.
I don't what software forumite Runtime Error used, but it is easy to check:

Code:
Mod(2,41094328366458894751937)^156635789-1
Mod(0, 41094328366458894751937)

Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 2020-06-20 at 17:48

2020-06-20, 17:48   #13
kriesel

"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

10100000011012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Parlak67 Please document how you found the factor.
You asked someone who did not find it, to document how he found it. After you made an extraordinary claim, with no documentation yet.
That seems ... odd.

Probably the factor finder used mfaktc or mfakto.

We do what we reasonably can to make such information available. Reference information blog
An Available software thread in the "New to GIMPS? Start Here" forum's Information and Answers subforum
And more, elsewhere.

Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2020-06-20 at 18:06

 2020-06-20, 18:14 #14 Uncwilly 6809 > 6502     """"""""""""""""""" Aug 2003 101×103 Posts 2·3·1,597 Posts Factors are absolute proof and the method of their discovery is basically irrelevant. They can be quickly verified to be true (a fraction of a second, IIRC). The PrimeNet server does that for all reported factors before they are entered into the database. And you have yet to state how you "knew" it to be prime. If you used any of the programs that I mentioned above, there was an error. Fixing any error in the program that produces false prime claims is important to us. Last fiddled with by Uncwilly on 2020-06-20 at 18:16
2020-06-20, 18:21   #15
Parlak67

Jun 2020

22×3 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kriesel Well done. This might be a a new speed record for empirically dispatching a dubious claim.
https://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM

2020-06-20, 18:28   #16
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

256E16 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Parlak67 https://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM
That is a fine tool. But it is not capable of testing a Mersenne Prime of this size.

See the attached screen grab.
Attached Thumbnails

2020-06-20, 18:34   #17
Batalov

"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

3·5·17·37 Posts

We are looking at this from a wrong direction.
He simply found that 156635789 is prime. --

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Parlak67 156635789 you can look with the program you want?

2020-06-20, 18:34   #18
Parlak67

Jun 2020

22×3 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly That is a fine tool. But it is not capable of testing a Mersenne Prime of this size. See the attached screen grab.
thanks for everything. I will start working again

2020-06-20, 18:34   #19
Runtime Error

Sep 2017
USA

5×47 Posts

I apologize for my earlier comment about IP addresses. There have been a few dubious claims recently that seem to be troll posts. Sorry for assuming.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Parlak67 Please document how you found the factor.
Just to be clear, 156635789 is a prime number. If you wrote a program and found it on your own, good job! It just isn't very big compared to the size of today's known prime numbers.

However, the Mersenne number 2156635789-1 is not prime because it is divisible by 41094328366458894751937.

The software used: mfaktc version 0.21

Last fiddled with by Runtime Error on 2020-06-20 at 18:37

2020-06-20, 18:40   #20
Parlak67

Jun 2020

22×3 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Runtime Error I apologize for my earlier comment about IP addresses. There have been a few dubious claims recently that seem to be troll posts. Sorry for assuming. Just to be clear, 156635789 is a prime number. If you wrote a program and found it on your own, good job! It just isn't very big compared to the size of today's known prime numbers. However, the Mersenne number 2156635789-1 is not prime because it is divisible by 41094328366458894751937. The software used: mfaktc version 0.21
numbers

155654789
160456789
369452123

2020-06-20, 18:40   #21
Batalov

"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2

3·5·17·37 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Runtime Error ... 2156635789-1 is not prime because it is divisible by 41094328366458894751937. The software used: mfaktc version 0.21
This reminds me of the Mr.Show sketch, "24 is the highest number."

...but wait! Runtime Error just said 41094328366458894751937, that is an enormous number!

2020-06-20, 18:45   #22
Parlak67

Jun 2020

22×3 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Batalov This reminds me of the Mr.Show sketch, "24 is the highest number." ...but wait! Runtime Error just said 41094328366458894751937, that is an enormous number!

My goal is not to make fun of someone here. Thank you for everything.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post ICWiener Software 38 2018-06-09 13:59 science_man_88 Miscellaneous Math 24 2010-11-23 13:43 Prime95 Miscellaneous Math 20 2008-07-29 16:58 Kosmaj 15k Search 117 2005-12-07 02:22 Bundu Data 3 2004-08-14 12:21

All times are UTC. The time now is 09:43.

Sun May 16 09:43:37 UTC 2021 up 38 days, 4:24, 0 users, load averages: 2.76, 2.73, 2.15