mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware > GPU Computing > GpuOwl

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-12-25, 10:57   #2674
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

113758 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDukeSix View Post
Are there any recommendations for a bored nVidia RTX3080? TF or PRP?
TF. They're not particularly great at PRP.
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-25, 11:48   #2675
BigDukeSix
 
Dec 2020

716 Posts
Default

Thank you very much. I will have a lot of reads to start there.
BigDukeSix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-25, 14:34   #2676
moebius
 
moebius's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Germany

10001000112 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDukeSix View Post
Thank you very much. I will have a lot of reads to start there.
Yes, the card should be better in TF, but it is still one of the useful consumer cards in terms of PRP. Read this post for comparison values https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...postcount=2603

Last fiddled with by moebius on 2020-12-25 at 14:35
moebius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-27, 18:36   #2677
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
"Norman D. Powell"
Aug 2009
Indiana, USA.

188010 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
TF. They're not particularly great at PRP.
Not so great at P-1 either. My 1080 can run them in about the same amount of time as my 2080.
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-27, 22:56   #2678
M344587487
 
M344587487's Avatar
 
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017

30116 Posts
Default

For no practical reason at all:


intel HD530 from an i7-6700HQ. 2133MT/s dual channel DDR4. PC slow to respond during test despite CPU practically idling.

Code:
./gpuowl -prp 77936867 -iters 20000
2020-12-27 17:52:10 GpuOwl VERSION v7.2-21-g28dbf88-dirty
2020-12-27 17:52:10 GpuOwl VERSION v7.2-21-g28dbf88-dirty
2020-12-27 17:52:10 Note: not found 'config.txt'
2020-12-27 17:52:10 config: -prp 77936867 -iters 20000 
2020-12-27 17:52:10 device 0, unique id ''
2020-12-27 17:52:12 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 FFT: 4M 1K:8:256 (18.58 bpw)
2020-12-27 17:52:12 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 OpenCL args "-DEXP=77936867u -DWIDTH=1024u -DSMALL_HEIGHT=256u -DMIDDLE=8u -DMM_CHAIN=1u -DMM2_CHAIN=2u -DMAX_ACCURACY=1 -DWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=0.33644726404543274 -DIWEIGHT_STEP_MINUS_1=-0.25174750481886216 -DIWEIGHTS={0,-0.25174750481886216,-0.44011820345520131,-0.16213409745771243,-0.37306474779553728,-0.061788266441989627,-0.29798072935699788,-0.47471232907613115,-0.21390437908665341,-0.41180199020062258,-0.11975874301407295,-0.3413572830988989,-0.014337887291734644,-0.26247586476052853,-0.44814572555075455,-0.17414732433395128,}  -cl-std=CL2.0 -cl-finite-math-only "
2020-12-27 17:52:20 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 OpenCL compilation in 7.82 s
2020-12-27 17:52:20 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 maxAlloc: 0.0 GB
2020-12-27 17:52:20 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 You should use -maxAlloc if your GPU has more than 4GB memory. See help '-h'
2020-12-27 17:52:20 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 P1(0) 0 bits
2020-12-27 17:52:20 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 PRP starting from beginning
2020-12-27 17:52:36 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 OK         0 on-load: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003
2020-12-27 17:52:36 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 validating proof residues for power 8
2020-12-27 17:52:36 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 Proof using power 8
2020-12-27 17:53:19 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 OK       800   0.00% 1579c241dc63eca6 35951 us/it + check 14.46s + save 0.19s; ETA 32d 10:18
2020-12-27 17:58:50 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867        10000   0.01% fc4f135f7cf4ad29 35923 us/it
2020-12-27 18:04:49 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 Stopping, please wait..
2020-12-27 18:05:04 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 77936867 OK     20000   0.03% 3cd1bd9d5e09cbc5 35930 us/it + check 14.46s + save 0.16s; ETA 32d 09:39
2020-12-27 18:05:04 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 Exiting because "stop requested"
2020-12-27 18:05:04 Intel(R) Gen9 HD Graphics NEO-0 Bye
Code:
sudo dmidecode --type 17
# dmidecode 3.2
Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs.
SMBIOS 3.0.0 present.

Handle 0x0044, DMI type 17, 40 bytes
Memory Device
    Array Handle: 0x0043
    Error Information Handle: Not Provided
    Total Width: 64 bits
    Data Width: 64 bits
    Size: 8192 MB
    Form Factor: SODIMM
    Set: None
    Locator: ChannelA-DIMM0
    Bank Locator: BANK 0
    Type: DDR4
    Type Detail: Synchronous
    Speed: 2133 MT/s
    Manufacturer: SK Hynix
    Serial Number: 65436018
    Asset Tag: 9876543210
    Part Number: HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF    
    Rank: 2
    Configured Memory Speed: 2133 MT/s
    Minimum Voltage: Unknown
    Maximum Voltage: Unknown
    Configured Voltage: 1.2 V

Handle 0x0045, DMI type 17, 40 bytes
Memory Device
    Array Handle: 0x0043
    Error Information Handle: Not Provided
    Total Width: 64 bits
    Data Width: 64 bits
    Size: 8192 MB
    Form Factor: SODIMM
    Set: None
    Locator: ChannelB-DIMM0
    Bank Locator: BANK 2
    Type: DDR4
    Type Detail: Synchronous
    Speed: 2133 MT/s
    Manufacturer: SK Hynix
    Serial Number: 65435418
    Asset Tag: 9876543210
    Part Number: HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF    
    Rank: 2
    Configured Memory Speed: 2133 MT/s
    Minimum Voltage: Unknown
    Maximum Voltage: Unknown
    Configured Voltage: 1.2 V
M344587487 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-12-30, 12:20   #2679
moebius
 
moebius's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Germany

547 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xyzzy View Post
How many "R7 units" will an MI100 replace?
Does anyone here work for the European Union and get access to Lumi with AMD Instinct gpu's at the end of 2021? The peak performance of LUMI is an astonishing 552 petaflop/s. The global bandwidth of the LUMI-GPU partition is 160 TB/s.
Then I could answer the question exactly.
https://www.lumi-supercomputer.eu/lu...upercomputers/

Last fiddled with by moebius on 2020-12-30 at 12:32
moebius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-01-07, 19:58   #2680
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
"Mike"
Aug 2002

5×1,597 Posts
Default

RX 6800
Code:
2021-01-07 13:33:05 gfx1030-0 OpenCL compilation in 2.54 s
2021-01-07 13:33:05 gfx1030-0 77936867 OK        0 loaded: blockSize 400, 0000000000000003
2021-01-07 13:33:06 gfx1030-0 77936867 OK      800   0.00%;  871 us/it; ETA 0d 18:51; 1579c241dc63eca6 (check 0.39s)
2021-01-07 13:36:00 gfx1030-0 77936867 OK   200000   0.26%;  870 us/it; ETA 0d 18:47; f0b04b45b0855bd2 (check 0.39s)
2021-01-07 13:38:55 gfx1030-0 77936867 OK   400000   0.51%;  873 us/it; ETA 0d 18:48; c03f94396a5aa29e (check 0.39s)
2021-01-07 13:41:49 gfx1030-0 77936867 OK   600000   0.77%;  869 us/it; ETA 0d 18:40; b9decd65ca71b629 (check 0.38s)
2021-01-07 13:44:43 gfx1030-0 77936867 OK   800000   1.03%;  866 us/it; ETA 0d 18:33; 21ebf3636148f663 (check 0.41s)
2021-01-07 13:47:35 gfx1030-0 77936867 OK  1000000   1.28%;  862 us/it; ETA 0d 18:25; 9bf9d9e6bff4286e (check 0.39s)
2021-01-07 13:50:29 gfx1030-0 77936867 OK  1200000   1.54%;  868 us/it; ETA 0d 18:30; da42731132f00140 (check 0.38s)
2021-01-07 13:53:23 gfx1030-0 77936867 OK  1400000   1.80%;  864 us/it; ETA 0d 18:22; 56d6868b11382d6c (check 0.38s)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	a.png
Views:	52
Size:	44.9 KB
ID:	24127   Click image for larger version

Name:	b.png
Views:	53
Size:	23.7 KB
ID:	24128   Click image for larger version

Name:	c.png
Views:	43
Size:	26.7 KB
ID:	24129  
Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-01-07, 21:43   #2681
moebius
 
moebius's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Germany

547 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xyzzy View Post
Thx for the benchmark, your fan speed is at 49%, shouldn't it run a little bit faster with more rpm.
moebius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-01-08, 01:00   #2682
Xyzzy
 
Xyzzy's Avatar
 
"Mike"
Aug 2002

5×1,597 Posts
Default

That is the default fan curve. They probably tuned it to be quiet. The temps are reasonable so we'll leave it be.
Xyzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-01-08, 01:22   #2683
M344587487
 
M344587487's Avatar
 
"Composite as Heck"
Oct 2017

11000000012 Posts
Default

As long as it doesn't thermal throttle it shouldn't matter. Technically lower temps does mean slightly lower power consumption all other things equal, but increasing power to the fans to lower the temps is robbing Peter to pay Paul.
M344587487 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2021-01-08, 05:47   #2684
moebius
 
moebius's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Germany

547 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M344587487 View Post
As long as it doesn't thermal throttle it shouldn't matter. Technically lower temps does mean slightly lower power consumption all other things equal, but increasing power to the fans to lower the temps is robbing Peter to pay Paul.
I actually only meant that, for example with GPU Tweak II, the temperatures could be briefly reduced manually a little and the memory clock could be increased by e.g. 150 MHz for for the benchmark . But I think the card won't reach values below 800 ┬Ás/it.

Last fiddled with by moebius on 2021-01-08 at 05:54
moebius is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mfakto: an OpenCL program for Mersenne prefactoring Bdot GPU Computing 1668 2020-12-22 15:38
GPUOWL AMD Windows OpenCL issues xx005fs GpuOwl 0 2019-07-26 21:37
Testing an expression for primality 1260 Software 17 2015-08-28 01:35
Testing Mersenne cofactors for primality? CRGreathouse Computer Science & Computational Number Theory 18 2013-06-08 19:12
Primality-testing program with multiple types of moduli (PFGW-related) Unregistered Information & Answers 4 2006-10-04 22:38

All times are UTC. The time now is 08:05.

Tue Mar 9 08:05:25 UTC 2021 up 96 days, 4:16, 0 users, load averages: 0.98, 1.58, 1.74

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.