![]() |
![]() |
#1046 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
5,261 Posts |
![]()
283^65 terminated.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1047 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2E4D16 Posts |
![]()
191^71 and 5040^42 terminate
I'm done with new base 5040. Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2022-12-11 at 23:30 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1048 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
33×439 Posts |
![]()
431^49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, & 65 terminate
433^49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, & 65 terminate Both sequences have only one remaining; exponent 63. :-) I'm done with both of these new bases. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1049 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
33·439 Posts |
![]()
83328^34 terminates
Only one remains on base 83328. I'm done with this new base. Because base 5040 had its max exponent reduced to 45, it also now has only one remaining. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1050 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
5,261 Posts |
![]()
I've queued one index for each of the following:
Code:
Last fiddled with by EdH on 2022-12-22 at 13:18 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1051 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
33×439 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1052 |
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns
5,261 Posts |
![]()
I added 373^63 back into the queue and it is finished again, but even with c130 present, it's not an inviting sequence.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1053 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
1185310 Posts |
![]()
I'm slowly working my way through all of these. Many of my machines have been tied up with the 120-digit effort but 2 freed up late yesterday. I'll load up 373^63 again later tonight.
Almost all of these sequences have been annoying. They keep picking up mid-high C130s and low-mid C140s that NFS has to be run on. Without a factor 3, they are just barely good enough for me to continue on but take much longer than expected. I was hoping to avoid using the Ryzen on these but the 16-thread machines are just too slow for the above 130s/140s. So I just now paused it on another effort and loaded a couple of sequences here into it. The good news: 2 of them dropped a factor 3 within a few indexes and so I'll almost definitely terminate 3-4 of them. One is already terminated but I'll announce them all at once. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1054 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
2E4D16 Posts |
![]()
397^63, 409^65, 431^63, 552^60, and 83328^32 terminate!!
That completes bases 397, 409, 431, 552, and 83328!!! ![]() Whew, that was one of the more prolific set of sequences that I've worked on since the early days of this effort. It helped that two of them dropped the factor 3 fairly quickly. Nice choice of splits, Ed! 373^63 is released at 160/156/3/t40 401^65 is released at 158/144/53/full The last one is doable at this point but I want to get back to other stuff. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1055 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
33·439 Posts |
![]()
443^49, 51, 53, 55, 57, and 59 terminate
That completes new base 443. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1056 |
"Gary"
May 2007
Overland Park, KS
33×439 Posts |
![]()
449^49, 51, 53, 55, 57, and 59 terminate
That completes new base 449. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unexpected termination of PM-1 | Miszka | Software | 22 | 2021-11-19 21:36 |
Easier pi(x) approximation | mathPuzzles | Math | 8 | 2017-05-04 10:58 |
Would finding a definate Pi value easier if... | xtreme2k | Math | 34 | 2013-09-09 23:54 |
Aliquot Termination Question - Largest Prime? | EdH | Aliquot Sequences | 6 | 2010-04-06 00:12 |
A new termination below 100k | 10metreh | Aliquot Sequences | 0 | 2010-03-11 18:24 |