mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-04-19, 14:02   #1
emiller
 
Apr 2017

10102 Posts
Default Manual Result already in database?

I'm having a hard time uploading results for M80,563,501.

I go to the manual upload page and attach the results.txt.

At the bottom of the page confirm uploading I see the following:

Click image for larger version

Name:	Screen Shot 2017-04-19 at 09.59.35.png
Views:	190
Size:	41.7 KB
ID:	15951


So I'm confused. One line says "Skipped 0 lines already in the database." which is what I expect.

But then the next field says "These Prime exponents were already in the database."

So which is it?

After uploading results, when I check the page for this exponent, it doesn't post my results:
https://www.mersenne.org/report_expo...0563501&full=1
emiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-19, 17:14   #2
VictordeHolland
 
VictordeHolland's Avatar
 
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands

100100110002 Posts
Default

What happens if you copy/paste the result lines from your results.txt into the box on the manual results page and submit them in that way?
VictordeHolland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-19, 18:14   #3
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

258510 Posts
Default

Are you posting your results to this page: https://www.mersenne.org/manual_result/

Or perhaps some other page, for example at mersenne.ca ?

Is your result an LL test, or some other kind of test? If it's an LL test, it should be in the format:

Code:
UID: username/machinename, M80563501 is not prime. Res64: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. We8: XXXXXXXX,YYYYYYYY,00000000, AID: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-20, 01:24   #4
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

52×311 Posts
Default

The problem is that you are trying to post a "this is a new prime" result.

It is extraordinarily likely that this is due to a bad build of CUDALucas or bad drivers. Someone here should be able to help you with that (or point you to a pre-compiled binary.)

BTW, welcome to GIMPS! I hope you stick with it despite the start.

Last fiddled with by Prime95 on 2017-04-20 at 01:25
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-20, 03:07   #5
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

3·11·89 Posts
Default

I wonder how many people are now checking if M80563501 is prime. I bet at least half a dozen. I won't bother since I know others have faster setups.
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-20, 13:40   #6
emiller
 
Apr 2017

2×5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
The problem is that you are trying to post a "this is a new prime" result.

It is extraordinarily likely that this is due to a bad build of CUDALucas or bad drivers. Someone here should be able to help you with that (or point you to a pre-compiled binary.)

BTW, welcome to GIMPS! I hope you stick with it despite the start.

Yes that's correct. I'm suspicious too. But I figured I could submit the result anyway. Isn't this what the LL double check jobs are for?
emiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-20, 16:15   #7
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

5·11·47 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prime95 View Post
The problem is that you are trying to post a "this is a new prime" result.

It is extraordinarily likely that this is due to a bad build of CUDALucas or bad drivers. Someone here should be able to help you with that (or point you to a pre-compiled binary.)

BTW, welcome to GIMPS! I hope you stick with it despite the start.
The problem is, the exponent is now stuck.

The first tester can't submit it, but as long as there is an unexpired first-test assignment, it can't be reserved as a double check either. And no one is particularly eager to poach it, knowing that it'll take a long time and might end up being a wasted effort if others do the same thing. Maybe MadPoo should take it.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-20, 17:57   #8
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

3×5×7×31 Posts
Default

I started to test it earlier. ETA ~34 hours.
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-20, 21:50   #9
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

52·311 Posts
Default

Prime reports go through a whole different path. It is not heavily tested, especially for manual reports.

Madpoo is running a test. He started a day or two ago.

We've had plenty of false positives from incorrect CudaLucas builds, so we don't get real excited when a first-time user reports a CudaLucas prime.


In the meantime, try doing a few triple-checks on exponents below 10 million or so to see if your CudaLucas matches known good results.
Prime95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-22, 02:31   #10
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

CB716 Posts
Default

It was not prime unfortunately, but as expected:
http://mersenne.org/M80563501
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-23, 00:44   #11
Madpoo
Serpentine Vermin Jar
 
Madpoo's Avatar
 
Jul 2014

22×3×277 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
It was not prime unfortunately, but as expected:
http://mersenne.org/M80563501
I forgot to check my run of it and reported mine just a few hours after yours. Well, it's successfully double-checked now.
Madpoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't get manual page to parse a result Siegmund PrimeNet 6 2017-01-08 22:22
manual TF result processing order changed? ixfd64 PrimeNet 2 2014-09-08 23:06
Manual result submission could fail sonjohan PrimeNet 12 2012-04-25 13:17
Manual submission of automatic assignment result tichy PrimeNet 4 2010-12-17 09:57
Reporting manual result pacionet Information & Answers 1 2010-08-25 20:13

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:34.


Tue Jan 25 11:34:31 UTC 2022 up 186 days, 6:03, 0 users, load averages: 1.00, 1.06, 1.09

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔