mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-04-17, 15:50   #760
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
Ͳօɾօղէօ

2·7·199 Posts
Default

Do remember that Haswell and later bump the VCore +0.1 when doing AVX2/FMA3 (which Prime95 will use).
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-18, 06:53   #761
db597
 
db597's Avatar
 
Jan 2003

7×29 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VictordeHolland View Post
Ryzen is about as fast as my 5?6? year old SandyBridge
The current Core architecture has been around for 6-7 years and has lots of time for software optimisations to be done for it. Ryzen has been out for 1 month... I remember back in the v26.xx days, Prime95 was a lot slower before optimisation.

My Ryzen is mainly working on World Community Grid projects (generally not highly optimised code). There I see a 2.5x the points per day compared to my 2600K @ stock clockspeeds. At the same clockspeed, the IPC is around Haswell level and it has double the number of cores.
db597 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-23, 11:23   #762
FSund
 
Apr 2017

102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by db597 View Post
@LaurV... thanks for the comparison benchmark.

So for the case of both systems running on 8 physical cores, it's 7.136ms for the i7-6950X @ 3.0GHz vs 12.69ms for the Ryzen 1700 @ 3.3GHz. Looks like Intel wins big in terms of IPC.

Would still be interesting to see the results from a i7-7700K (half the cores, but higher IPC and higher clockspeed)... to compare at a similar cost level (a Ryzen 1700 system being still a bit cheaper than a comparable i7-7700K system).
Here are my results

Hardware:
CPU: i7-7700K - at 4.9 GHz with AVX Core Ratio Negative Offset of 2 (which reduces the multiplier to 47 when running Prime95, giving a clock speed of 4.7 GHz)
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15
Motherboard: ASUS TUF Z270 Mark 1 - BIOS version 0906
PSU: EVGA SuperNOVA 550 G3
RAM: 2x Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200MHz 8GB - at XMP 3200 MHz
OS Drive: Corsair Force MP500 240GB M.2 PCIe SSD

Code:
[Sun Apr 23 11:02:28 2017]
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/report_benchmarks
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700K CPU @ 4.20GHz
CPU speed: 4551.15 MHz, 4 hyperthreaded cores
CPU features: Prefetchw, SSE, SSE2, SSE4, AVX, AVX2, FMA
L1 cache size: 32 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB, L3 cache size: 8 MB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
TLBS: 64
Prime95 64-bit version 29.1, RdtscTiming=1
Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker):  2.19 ms.  Throughput: 457.47 iter/sec.
Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 10.28,  9.28,  9.05,  9.78 ms.  Throughput: 417.80 iter/sec.
Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker):  2.50 ms.  Throughput: 400.18 iter/sec.
Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 10.57, 10.02, 13.69, 10.16 ms.  Throughput: 365.92 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker):  2.82 ms.  Throughput: 354.13 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 12.16, 11.62, 11.63, 13.58 ms.  Throughput: 327.87 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker):  3.18 ms.  Throughput: 314.12 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 13.08, 12.59, 16.81, 12.99 ms.  Throughput: 292.38 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker):  3.45 ms.  Throughput: 289.75 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 15.42, 14.62, 14.27, 15.11 ms.  Throughput: 269.51 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker):  3.96 ms.  Throughput: 252.73 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 16.08, 15.22, 20.47, 15.33 ms.  Throughput: 242.01 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker):  4.11 ms.  Throughput: 243.02 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 19.07, 17.39, 16.95, 17.41 ms.  Throughput: 226.40 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker):  4.73 ms.  Throughput: 211.63 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 18.80, 18.03, 24.42, 17.97 ms.  Throughput: 205.23 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker):  4.79 ms.  Throughput: 208.79 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 21.20, 19.72, 19.60, 20.85 ms.  Throughput: 196.85 iter/sec.
[Sun Apr 23 11:07:29 2017]
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker):  5.46 ms.  Throughput: 183.31 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 21.19, 20.58, 27.73, 21.08 ms.  Throughput: 179.28 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker):  6.09 ms.  Throughput: 164.13 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 28.35, 24.43, 24.09, 24.33 ms.  Throughput: 158.81 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker):  6.97 ms.  Throughput: 143.50 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 27.05, 25.88, 34.61, 25.76 ms.  Throughput: 143.33 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker):  7.94 ms.  Throughput: 125.99 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 33.12, 30.44, 30.03, 34.13 ms.  Throughput: 125.65 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker):  8.88 ms.  Throughput: 112.61 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 33.69, 32.84, 46.51, 32.49 ms.  Throughput: 112.42 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker):  9.31 ms.  Throughput: 107.45 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 35.75, 35.32, 35.11, 45.61 ms.  Throughput: 106.69 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 10.54 ms.  Throughput: 94.88 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 39.98, 38.35, 54.51, 40.08 ms.  Throughput: 94.39 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 10.75 ms.  Throughput: 93.03 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 43.70, 41.72, 40.36, 46.95 ms.  Throughput: 92.93 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 12.24 ms.  Throughput: 81.67 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 47.77, 45.73, 62.07, 45.13 ms.  Throughput: 81.07 iter/sec.
FSund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-23, 13:26   #763
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
Ͳօɾօղէօ

2·7·199 Posts
Default

If there ever were a case for more memory bandwidth...

It's nice to see a 4 core with over 200 iter/ms at 4096K FFT though!
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-23, 14:27   #764
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

23·7·97 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
It's nice to see a 4 core with over 200 iter/ms at 4096K FFT though!
I think you have an extra 'm' in there. Maybe with the magical optical computers (using yellow of course) we will see 200 iter/ms. But as of today, I think not.
retina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-04-23, 15:42   #765
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
Ͳօɾօղէօ

2·7·199 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retina View Post
I think you have an extra 'm' in there. Maybe with the magical optical computers (using yellow of course) we will see 200 iter/ms. But as of today, I think not.
lol yes. Good eyes.
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-05-28, 19:21   #766
Dresdenboy
 
Dresdenboy's Avatar
 
Apr 2003
Berlin, Germany

192 Posts
Default

CPU: Ryzen 7 1700X stock (mostly running 3.5GHz on all cores with Prime95)
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 SE-AM4
Motherboard: ASRock Taichi X370
BIOS version: 2.34 (Beta with AGESA 1.0.0.6)
RAM: 2x16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4 3200MHz 14-14-14-36-1T dual rank
OS: Win10Pro x64

Code:
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/report_benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor         
CPU speed: 3400.29 MHz, 8 hyperthreaded cores
CPU features: 3DNow! Prefetch, SSE, SSE2, SSE4, AVX, AVX2, FMA
L1 cache size: 32 KB
L2 cache size: 512 KB, L3 cache size: 16 MB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
L1 TLBS: 64
L2 TLBS: 1536
Prime95 64-bit version 29.1, RdtscTiming=1
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 13.522 ms., avg: 13.721 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 17.576 ms., avg: 18.112 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 21.111 ms., avg: 21.577 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 25.393 ms., avg: 26.027 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 28.571 ms., avg: 30.210 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 36.353 ms., avg: 36.910 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 43.307 ms., avg: 43.586 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 51.546 ms., avg: 51.943 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 58.803 ms., avg: 60.538 ms.
Timing FFTs using 2 threads on 1 core.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 15.871 ms., avg: 16.169 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 20.416 ms., avg: 20.792 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 24.707 ms., avg: 25.089 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 30.205 ms., avg: 30.626 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 34.890 ms., avg: 35.156 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 42.726 ms., avg: 44.333 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 50.388 ms., avg: 51.474 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 59.980 ms., avg: 60.897 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 70.055 ms., avg: 70.686 ms.
Timing FFTs using 8 threads on 8 cores.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 2.107 ms., avg: 2.420 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 3.006 ms., avg: 3.540 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 3.573 ms., avg: 4.106 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 4.235 ms., avg: 4.553 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 4.794 ms., avg: 5.213 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 5.536 ms., avg: 5.879 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 6.778 ms., avg: 6.975 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 7.995 ms., avg: 8.094 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 9.107 ms., avg: 9.352 ms.
Timing FFTs using 16 threads on 8 cores.
Best time for 2048K FFT length: 2.381 ms., avg: 2.501 ms.
Best time for 2560K FFT length: 3.175 ms., avg: 3.610 ms.
Best time for 3072K FFT length: 3.882 ms., avg: 4.355 ms.
Best time for 3584K FFT length: 4.646 ms., avg: 5.146 ms.
Best time for 4096K FFT length: 5.256 ms., avg: 5.451 ms.
Best time for 5120K FFT length: 6.213 ms., avg: 6.490 ms.
Best time for 6144K FFT length: 7.405 ms., avg: 7.650 ms.
Best time for 7168K FFT length: 8.841 ms., avg: 8.956 ms.
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 10.258 ms., avg: 10.349 ms.
Throughput results (w/o SMT):
Code:
Prime95 64-bit version 29.1, RdtscTiming=1
Timings for 2048K FFT length (1 cpu, 1 worker): 14.30 ms.  Throughput: 69.93 iter/sec.
Timings for 2048K FFT length (8 cpus, 1 worker):  2.14 ms.  Throughput: 467.81 iter/sec.
Timings for 2048K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 16.24, 16.03, 15.99, 16.03, 16.02, 15.95, 16.18, 16.03 ms.  Throughput: 498.14 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (1 cpu, 1 worker): 18.11 ms.  Throughput: 55.23 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (8 cpus, 1 worker):  3.03 ms.  Throughput: 330.57 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 22.72, 22.41, 22.23, 22.18, 22.13, 22.05, 22.34, 22.21 ms.  Throughput: 359.04 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (1 cpu, 1 worker): 21.96 ms.  Throughput: 45.54 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (8 cpus, 1 worker):  3.63 ms.  Throughput: 275.83 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 27.70, 27.15, 26.61, 26.67, 26.34, 26.48, 26.85, 26.81 ms.  Throughput: 298.28 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (1 cpu, 1 worker): 26.18 ms.  Throughput: 38.20 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (8 cpus, 1 worker):  4.28 ms.  Throughput: 233.54 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 32.17, 31.36, 31.35, 31.24, 31.32, 31.04, 31.43, 31.45 ms.  Throughput: 254.64 iter/sec.
[Sun May 28 21:29:40 2017]
Timings for 4096K FFT length (1 cpu, 1 worker): 29.84 ms.  Throughput: 33.51 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (8 cpus, 1 worker):  4.87 ms.  Throughput: 205.25 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 36.36, 35.91, 35.76, 35.53, 35.79, 35.88, 36.13, 36.07 ms.  Throughput: 222.68 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (1 cpu, 1 worker): 37.73 ms.  Throughput: 26.50 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (8 cpus, 1 worker):  5.53 ms.  Throughput: 180.79 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 43.10, 42.08, 42.24, 41.99, 41.81, 41.76, 41.92, 42.09 ms.  Throughput: 189.93 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (1 cpu, 1 worker): 44.95 ms.  Throughput: 22.25 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (8 cpus, 1 worker):  6.86 ms.  Throughput: 145.67 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 51.06, 50.97, 50.29, 50.15, 50.18, 50.24, 50.41, 50.41 ms.  Throughput: 158.54 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (1 cpu, 1 worker): 53.47 ms.  Throughput: 18.70 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (8 cpus, 1 worker):  8.10 ms.  Throughput: 123.49 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 61.59, 60.51, 59.82, 60.19, 60.22, 59.97, 60.62, 60.58 ms.  Throughput: 132.37 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (1 cpu, 1 worker): 60.89 ms.  Throughput: 16.42 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (8 cpus, 1 worker):  9.13 ms.  Throughput: 109.52 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 70.80, 69.62, 69.27, 70.24, 69.69, 68.67, 69.21, 69.33 ms.  Throughput: 114.95 iter/sec.

Last fiddled with by Dresdenboy on 2017-05-28 at 19:58
Dresdenboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-05-28, 21:41   #767
Dresdenboy
 
Dresdenboy's Avatar
 
Apr 2003
Berlin, Germany

192 Posts
Default

With new data at hand, we could do some more comparisons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by db597 View Post
I posted the below results from my Ryzen 1700 (non-X) in the AMD Zen speculation thread earlier. Just thought I'd consolidate the results together with all the other benchmarks in this thread and also add a bit more detail on the setup.

CPU: AMD Ryzen 1700 (non-X)
Frequency: 3.32GHz @ 1.031V (stock rating 3GHz / Turbo 3.7GHz)
Heatsink: AMD Wraith Spire
Memory: Corsair 8GBx2 @ 2933GHz CAS16 (single rank)
Motherboard Asus X370-Pro
BIOS: 0604 (AGESA 1.0.0.4a)
Operating system: Windows 10 x64 Creators Update
Prime95 version: 29.1 Build 15

Code:
[snip]
Timings for 8192K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 99.83, 99.12, 96.13, 97.41, 96.20, 96.03, 96.76, 96.01 ms. Throughput: 82.33 iter/sec.
The 8192K FFT performance looks incredible on this version of Prime95, especially when all 8 cores are thrown at it. Would be good if someone can post results from a similarly priced Intel i7 7700K on Prime95 v29.1 Build 15 for comparison (I expect the i7 is a lot faster per core, but at the end of the day having double the cores may make it a rather close competition).
It seems, memory plays an important role. I got 30% lower times with the new beta BIOS, 3200-14-14-14-36 DR, and running at 3.5GHz (stock CPB):
Code:
Timings for 8192K FFT length (8 cpus, 8 workers): 70.80, 69.62, 69.27, 70.24, 69.69, 68.67, 69.21, 69.33 ms.  Throughput: 114.95 iter/sec.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
Well, not exactly the same price range, but for a comparison term: i7-6950X @ 3.00GHz (yes, underclocked, having momentarily problems with cooling, April is Thai summer, the hottest period of the year, ~45°C outside), with single worker, working on 8 cores (from 10), on the required FFT size, Prime95 64-bit version 28.10:

<snip>
Timing FFTs using 8 threads on 8 physical CPUs.
<snip>
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 7.136 ms., avg: 7.291 ms.
<snip>
From my Ryzen 7 result:
Code:
Timing FFTs using 8 threads on 8 cores.
<snip>
Best time for 8192K FFT length: 9.107 ms., avg: 9.352 ms.
Normalized to 3GHz this would be 10.625 ms, or 67% the speed of your result. That's the penalty for half the AVX + cache throughput and mem channels.

Last fiddled with by Dresdenboy on 2017-05-28 at 21:44
Dresdenboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-20, 22:26   #768
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

22×3×101 Posts
Default

Below are the timings for my new build. The hardware specs are as follows:

Intel i7-7700, 3.6 GHZ, Turbo 4.2 GHz.
RAM: Kingston Hyper Fury DDR-4 2400 2*4GB
Main Board: Asus Prime B250M-A
CPU Cooler: Arctic i11 (Recommended by Mark Rose.)
Prime95 v29.1 Build 14


Quote:
[Tue Jun 20 18:01:25 2017]
Compare your results to other computers at http://www.mersenne.org/report_benchmarks
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ 3.60GHz
CPU speed: 4078.95 MHz, 4 hyperthreaded cores
CPU features: Prefetchw, SSE, SSE2, SSE4, AVX, AVX2, FMA
L1 cache size: 32 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB, L3 cache size: 8 MB
L1 cache line size: 64 bytes
L2 cache line size: 64 bytes
TLBS: 64
Machine topology as determined by hwloc library:
Machine#0 (total=6990040KB, Backend=Windows, hwlocVersion=1.11.6, ProcessName=prime95.exe)
NUMANode#0 (local=6990040KB, total=6990040KB)
Package#0 (CPUVendor=GenuineIntel, CPUFamilyNumber=6, CPUModelNumber=158, CPUModel="Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700 CPU @ 3.60GHz", CPUStepping=9)
L3 (size=8192KB, linesize=64, ways=16, Inclusive=1)
L2 (size=256KB, linesize=64, ways=4, Inclusive=0)
L1d (size=32KB, linesize=64, ways=8, Inclusive=0)
Core (cpuset: 0x00000003)
PU#0 (cpuset: 0x00000001)
PU#1 (cpuset: 0x00000002)
L2 (size=256KB, linesize=64, ways=4, Inclusive=0)
L1d (size=32KB, linesize=64, ways=8, Inclusive=0)
Core (cpuset: 0x0000000c)
PU#2 (cpuset: 0x00000004)
PU#3 (cpuset: 0x00000008)
L2 (size=256KB, linesize=64, ways=4, Inclusive=0)
L1d (size=32KB, linesize=64, ways=8, Inclusive=0)
Core (cpuset: 0x00000030)
PU#4 (cpuset: 0x00000010)
PU#5 (cpuset: 0x00000020)
L2 (size=256KB, linesize=64, ways=4, Inclusive=0)
L1d (size=32KB, linesize=64, ways=8, Inclusive=0)
Core (cpuset: 0x000000c0)
PU#6 (cpuset: 0x00000040)
PU#7 (cpuset: 0x00000080)
Prime95 64-bit version 29.1, RdtscTiming=1
Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 2.43 ms. Throughput: 412.20 iter/sec.
Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 10.87, 10.83, 10.88, 10.84 ms. Throughput: 368.51 iter/sec.
Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 2.64 ms. Throughput: 379.40 iter/sec.
Timings for 2048K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 11.82, 11.53, 11.55, 11.65 ms. Throughput: 343.76 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 3.16 ms. Throughput: 316.92 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 13.89, 13.85, 13.92, 13.88 ms. Throughput: 288.05 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 3.38 ms. Throughput: 295.71 iter/sec.
Timings for 2560K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 14.69, 14.55, 14.54, 14.65 ms. Throughput: 273.83 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 3.88 ms. Throughput: 257.76 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 16.83, 16.78, 16.81, 16.90 ms. Throughput: 237.67 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 4.20 ms. Throughput: 238.23 iter/sec.
Timings for 3072K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 17.86, 17.48, 17.81, 17.42 ms. Throughput: 226.76 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 4.65 ms. Throughput: 214.84 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 19.77, 19.75, 19.85, 19.80 ms. Throughput: 202.10 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 5.01 ms. Throughput: 199.58 iter/sec.
Timings for 3584K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 20.65, 20.55, 20.56, 20.64 ms. Throughput: 194.19 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 5.32 ms. Throughput: 188.08 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 22.75, 22.28, 22.42, 22.61 ms. Throughput: 177.67 iter/sec.
[Tue Jun 20 18:06:28 2017]
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 5.81 ms. Throughput: 172.10 iter/sec.
Timings for 4096K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 23.71, 23.68, 23.61, 23.63 ms. Throughput: 169.10 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 6.79 ms. Throughput: 147.20 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 28.19, 27.94, 28.18, 28.03 ms. Throughput: 142.44 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 7.37 ms. Throughput: 135.77 iter/sec.
Timings for 5120K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 29.78, 29.50, 29.67, 29.47 ms. Throughput: 135.12 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 8.58 ms. Throughput: 116.61 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 35.04, 35.72, 35.79, 35.68 ms. Throughput: 112.50 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 9.65 ms. Throughput: 103.64 iter/sec.
Timings for 6144K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 38.22, 35.56, 40.69, 39.95 ms. Throughput: 103.89 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 10.03 ms. Throughput: 99.73 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 40.22, 39.93, 40.05, 40.20 ms. Throughput: 99.75 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 11.24 ms. Throughput: 88.94 iter/sec.
Timings for 7168K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 45.00, 44.19, 44.71, 44.65 ms. Throughput: 89.62 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cpus, 1 worker): 11.71 ms. Throughput: 85.42 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cpus, 4 workers): 46.02, 45.88, 45.80, 45.96 ms. Throughput: 87.11 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 1 worker): 13.02 ms. Throughput: 76.83 iter/sec.
Timings for 8192K FFT length (4 cpus hyperthreaded, 4 workers): 52.32, 51.69, 52.79, 51.94 ms. Throughput: 76.65 iter/sec.
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-21, 00:25   #769
Mark Rose
 
Mark Rose's Avatar
 
"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013
Ͳօɾօղէօ

2·7·199 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by storm5510 View Post
Below are the timings for my new build. The hardware specs are as follows:

Intel i7-7700, 3.6 GHZ, Turbo 4.2 GHz.
RAM: Kingston Hyper Fury DDR-4 2400 2*4GB
Main Board: Asus Prime B250M-A
CPU Cooler: Arctic i11 (Recommended by Mark Rose.)
Prime95 v29.1 Build 14
Timings look good!

If you want to save a little power, you can go into your BIOS and tweak the 4-core Turbo speed and lower it to 3.6 GHz. You should still get almost the same throughput. That way if you're running mprime the power usage and heat will be lower, but when running anything that doesn't use all four 4 cores it will get the full turbo speed.
Mark Rose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-06-21, 02:54   #770
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

22×3×101 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Rose View Post
Timings look good!

If you want to save a little power, you can go into your BIOS and tweak the 4-core Turbo speed and lower it to 3.6 GHz. You should still get almost the same throughput. That way if you're running mprime the power usage and heat will be lower, but when running anything that doesn't use all four 4 cores it will get the full turbo speed.
I had a battle on my hands for a while. It was pulling 350 watts into the PSU. CPU cores running above 90°C. It was blowing hot air like a furnace. This was with Prime95 only!

I've made several trips back into the BIOS since. I loaded the default settings and everything started running much cooler. The power pull now is 142 watts and core temps are running in the low to mid 60's. Again, with Prime95 only, running a P-1. I don't know what settings the BIOS originally had. The first time I powered up, I just sat here and looked at it for a while. There is a lot in there.

The CPU is hovering between 3.96 and 4.02 GHz. However, and this is something I will probably need to put in the Prime95 area. It's only using four, of the eight, threads available, and will not allow me to use more than one worker. Curious!
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LLR benchmark thread Oddball Riesel Prime Search 5 2010-08-02 00:11
Perpetual I'm pi**ed off thread rogue Soap Box 19 2009-10-28 19:17
Perpetual "interesting video" thread... Xyzzy Lounge 9 2006-12-24 20:06
Perpetual autostereogram thread... Xyzzy Lounge 10 2006-09-28 00:36
Perpetual ECM factoring challenge thread... Xyzzy Factoring 65 2005-09-05 08:16

All times are UTC. The time now is 05:33.

Thu May 28 05:33:28 UTC 2020 up 64 days, 3:06, 1 user, load averages: 1.19, 1.18, 1.23

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.