mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Extra Stuff > Blogorrhea > storflyt32

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-09-21, 00:39   #298
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

7·61 Posts
Default

http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001169176211


Adding both the P17, and the P32, and next the question about any "faking", for next also help.


Thinking of RSA-768 being just two P116's for such a thing, next a computational issue as well, except for not any right to know either.


But perhaps so, for also fact, that the sequential, for also consecutive factoring, could be still the better thing, for perhaps also more important, except for not returning, or yielding the final answer either.


We sometimes could make it only "loose factors" here, except for not any proven either, because perhaps no such thing needed either.


Any algebra perhaps, and next also Fibonacci as well, for only that of 2+3+6.



But rather past midnight here, and ending up thinking it should be 2*3 instead, except for not any 5+11 either.



Sorry about that, but is any Fibonacci any perturbation sequence, for also that of Fermat factors as well?


Any "consecutive" prime numbers, for also factors as well, and perhaps we do not have that either.


I once gave a thought that the average difference between factors, should be the total sum, divided with the total numbers known, for only that of factors.


3/2 = 1.5, and 5/3 = 1.6666, for only so easy, and next it could end up being just only reciprocal for such, meaning fractions of given numbers.


Except for still only the odd number returning just a prime, of course.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2018-09-21 at 00:42
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-27, 02:36   #299
storflyt32
 
Feb 2013

42710 Posts
Default

My idiocy question, for perhaps the top of the day. Here pressing LF, or CR, but with no success.


Should not be my keyboard, however.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method


Something is wrong here, but rather noticing the fact that the link in question, for also article, became a quite smooth one, for also worth reading.


Needs getting back at the CR here, because with both BOINC and also Seti@home, they are getting a bit angry with me here.


Checking in tomorrrow, but not working here right here.


Perhaps better working now.


My keyboard blew.




Or the kitchen sink as well.


http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000001173053456


Giving it a try right now, but some 320,000 (321,000) relations needed here.


But next that you also perhaps know that I do not give the longer ones any reason either, for also chance, because also "Uhm" as well,
for only blowing a chance, for that of primality.


Never say never, for that of 2*2 = 4, of course, because perhaps not what I meant either.

Last fiddled with by storflyt32 on 2018-10-04 at 02:48
storflyt32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can Pollard Rho cycles be used to find a factor? wwf Factoring 26 2013-09-30 04:24
PFGW can't find a small factor. Arkadiusz Software 7 2013-02-18 12:43
Chance to find an n-digit factor with ECM RedGolpe Factoring 4 2007-03-23 15:24
How much ECM does it take to find a given factor? geoff Factoring 5 2004-09-29 20:14
Where I find the best program to it factor keys? I use AMD. chrow Factoring 5 2004-02-19 10:15

All times are UTC. The time now is 11:20.

Sat Jun 6 11:20:41 UTC 2020 up 73 days, 8:53, 0 users, load averages: 1.64, 1.63, 1.66

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.