mersenneforum.org Predict M52
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2019-01-04, 20:42   #34
GP2

Sep 2003

13×199 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly I left these off the charts: 258150181 March 12, 2052 402143633
In the first graph, it might be more orthodox to have time be the horizontal axis and the exponent as the vertical axis. Also, the exponent axis really ought to be logarithmic.

 2019-03-06, 11:01 #35 ChZ   Feb 2019 4910 Posts Recent Results: M94029857 is not prime. Res64: E7D36A179899BF__ M107448181 is not prime. Res64: BC8CA4274CD2AC__ M110691517 is not prime. Res64: EED0F015A35336__
2019-03-06, 15:35   #36
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

948110 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by ChZ Recent Results:
So, you targeted the specific exponents guessed. Big whoop!
You haven't bothered to make a guess in this thread. Your other 2 posts have been asking for help because you have had mis-matches. Why do you think that your results are valid? Do you think that the list that we have in this thread are magic exponents?

And BTW, your potshots at the exponents do not invalidate them as good guesses.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly THE RULES OF THE GAME:. . . If you guess a number that has known factor, at the time you posted, your guess will be ignored. It can have a 'composite' LL or PRP status (pending a recheck), but not a factor. Guessing a number with a known factor will count against you and impose a wait as in rule 6.]

2019-03-06, 15:37   #37
masser

Jul 2003

2×5×157 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Do you think that the list that we have in this thread are magic exponents?
Speak for yourself. My guesses are gold. I recommend ChZ checks them next.

2019-03-06, 18:21   #38
GP2

Sep 2003

A1B16 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly So, you targeted the specific exponents guessed. Big whoop! You haven't bothered to make a guess in this thread. Your other 2 posts have been asking for help because you have had mis-matches. Why do you think that your results are valid? Do you think that the list that we have in this thread are magic exponents? And BTW, your potshots at the exponents do not invalidate them as good guesses.

All the mismatches he posted have been verified good, except for 79961303 which is 80% of the way through a triple check.

Christoph Zenger has turned in about 150 LL results over the years, and the vast majority are already verified good double-checks. There are about six bad results, all of which were from 2017 and earlier.

There is no rule against testing the exponents posted here, and no particular reason to think that these first-time results will be invalidated by double checks.

2019-03-06, 20:48   #39
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

19·499 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by GP2 There is no rule against testing the exponents posted here, and no particular reason to think that these first-time results will be invalidated by double checks.
It is often not about the specific exponent, rather range. To target them for LL is an exercise in ignorance (of the rules). It is about being closest. Doing TF to try to knock the guess out has potential as a strategy to win the game.

 2019-03-11, 03:21 #40 dcheuk     Jan 2019 Pittsburgh, PA 257 Posts M87668491 March 14, 2019 M89065523 March 14, 2020 M91761547 March 14, 2021
 2019-04-06, 14:40 #41 kriesel     "TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17" Mar 2017 US midwest 139916 Posts TF 2019-04-05 factor 104738601786867368806153 for M402143633 next guess: 402143717 2052-03-12 Last fiddled with by kriesel on 2019-04-06 at 14:42
2019-04-06, 14:42   #42
kriesel

"TF79LL86GIMPS96gpu17"
Mar 2017
US midwest

501710 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by LaurV What do we get if we guess right?
Eternal fame and a silly grin. ;)

2019-04-06, 17:10   #43
Uncwilly
6809 > 6502

"""""""""""""""""""
Aug 2003
101×103 Posts

19×499 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by kriesel TF 2019-04-05 factor 104738601786867368806153 for M402143633 next guess: 402143717 2052-03-12
Please show me in the rules where a factor found for your guess allows for an new guess. And if it does, why a 60 day wait should not apply?

2019-04-07, 17:23   #44
dcheuk

Jan 2019
Pittsburgh, PA

257 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Uncwilly Please show me in the rules where a factor found for your guess allows for an new guess. And if it does, why a 60 day wait should not apply?
So harsh, but I guess rules are rules.

Doesn't that means if curtisc were to join in, if he's on this forum that is, would get 7 guesses lol.

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Uncwilly Lounge 65 2018-01-06 17:11 Raman Lounge 3 2016-10-03 19:23 Xyzzy Lounge 66 2014-02-01 14:45 ewmayer Lounge 215 2008-09-17 21:14 Uncwilly Lounge 22 2005-02-27 02:11

All times are UTC. The time now is 22:52.

Tue Apr 13 22:52:35 UTC 2021 up 5 days, 17:33, 1 user, load averages: 2.56, 2.48, 2.33

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.