![]() |
![]() |
#529 |
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
331910 Posts |
![]()
The page now allows you to specify zero factors, but it will be an exclusive request: if you select zero factors it will show only unfactored exponents, if you select 1+ factors it will only show factored exponents (as before).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#530 |
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
2×13×17 Posts |
![]()
The custom B1 doesn't work when 0 factors are set.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#531 |
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
3,319 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#532 |
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
6728 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#533 |
Sep 2020
Germany
2×32 Posts |
![]()
I noticed something odd: For some exponents with certified PRP tests the residue and status are shown in the small PrimeNet details table at the top. Other exponents with an equal status don't show any information in there and also the residue is still masked in the PRP results section. Is this intended?
Example with information: https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/101086597 Example without information: https://www.mersenne.ca/exponent/101086967 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#534 | |
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
331910 Posts |
![]() Quote:
LL double-checks made it easy to know the unmasked residue: first-time (and unmatching) results are sent from mersenne.org as masked residues, a matching double-check is sent as an unmasked residue. But now with PRP there is no double-check, the PRP check is shown with a masked residue at the time of completion, and the PRP certification that comes later basically just says "certified". I currently have no practical mechanism to fill in the now-unmasked residues. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#535 | |
"Mihai Preda"
Apr 2015
25118 Posts |
![]()
The most recent GpuOwl's P-1 calculator is here:
https://github.com/preda/gpuowl/blob/master/pm1/pm1.cpp I dropped the equivalent python version because it was becoming laborious to maintain parallel changes to the two implementations; but the logic in the C++ version should be readable enough (IMO), and if it isn't I can answer questions. Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#536 | |
Sep 2020
Germany
1216 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#537 |
"James Heinrich"
May 2004
ex-Northern Ontario
3,319 Posts |
![]()
That would be the easy-for-me solution. However it's not so easy on mersenne.org server, it's been discussed before but it's non-trivial to relate the certification to the original PRP after the fact based on the log data. We've discussed it before but have not yet come up with a satisfactory solution.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#538 |
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
6728 Posts |
![]()
The page seems to be non-responding, does anyone else have a problem too?
EDIT: All working now, it seems. Last fiddled with by Viliam Furik on 2021-03-05 at 17:55 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#539 |
"Viliam Furík"
Jul 2018
Martin, Slovakia
2×13×17 Posts |
![]()
When I click on the k number in the factors list, it should direct me to the list of numbers with a factor with that k, but now it redirects me to branch list of all exponents in the database. This link should show factors with k=3960, but doesn't. Same for any other k.
Last fiddled with by Viliam Furik on 2021-03-05 at 22:54 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Small inconsistencies between mersenne.org and mersenne.ca factor databases | GP2 | mersenne.ca | 44 | 2016-06-19 19:29 |
mersenne.ca (ex mersenne-aries.sili.net) | LaurV | mersenne.ca | 8 | 2013-11-25 21:01 |
Gaussian-Mersenne & Eisenstein-Mersenne primes | siegert81 | Math | 2 | 2011-09-19 17:36 |
Mersenne Wiki: Improving the mersenne primes web site by FOSS methods | optim | PrimeNet | 13 | 2004-07-09 13:51 |