![]() |
![]() |
#276 |
"Mike"
Aug 2002
2·5·11·73 Posts |
![]()
We were under the impression that having the team forums go public was assumed this time?
We have read all of the game, both sides, and we do not see anything that would be embarrassing or weird to read. But, if there is an issue, let us know now! FWIW, we followed this game closely and being able to see both sides "think" really taught us a lot! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#277 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
361710 Posts |
![]()
Ok, open it up
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#278 |
"Mike"
Aug 2002
2·5·11·73 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#279 |
"Mike"
Aug 2002
2·5·11·73 Posts |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#280 |
Just call me Henry
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)
2×2,927 Posts |
![]()
So where did the Geckos make their mistake?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#281 |
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3,617 Posts |
![]()
Maybe exchanging Queens and moving our pawn onto c4?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#282 |
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
7·467 Posts |
![]()
I don't think exchanging queens was a problem, but I do think 16...c4 was a mistake. We concentrated on a lot of tactics when considering that move, but White's simple positional handling of the situation exposed our pawn on c4 as a weakness.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#283 | |
Jul 2014
23 Posts |
![]()
A noticeable mistake. Black lost two tempi because of the required knight moves (since a5 was not a good place for it) and helped White un-cramp his position, while trading off a potential major supporter of a (more careful) Q-side advance.
Quote:
It does attack W's d3 weak square ... but B can't take much advantage because he doesn't have a way to get his knight there. A weak square that can't be taken advantage of is not so weak. Last fiddled with by ch4 on 2014-12-05 at 01:13 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#284 |
Basketry That Evening!
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88
3·29·83 Posts |
![]()
I must say, of all the things to be happening when I returned, I didn't expect game 2 to be one of them.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#285 |
May 2004
New York City
23×232 Posts |
![]()
Perhaps 0. (agree to play the pirates) ?
I mean, can a Gecko really expect to beat a Pirate ? (ARRGH) Really, I didn't didn't start following the chess until yesterday. It's terrific, and I may continue to. My game isn't even near Gecko quality, and I have to refresh my understanding of algebraic notation, and I must use a board (my mental chess is weak). But this is a great way to learn, watching you guys play and analyze, and I might join in in a future game, time willing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#286 | ||
"Brian"
Jul 2007
The Netherlands
7·467 Posts |
![]() Quote:
![]() (Of course, I'm not a pirate, nor even a captain, and our ship has always observed maritime law, so maybe I'm shooting my mouth off about what I can't know.) Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vote chess game 4: To be decided? Some chess variant will be interesting to consider with! | Raman | Chess | 6 | 2016-12-06 06:50 |
Vote Chess: Game 4 | Xyzzy | Chess | 14 | 2015-11-12 20:54 |
Vote Chess: Game 3 | Xyzzy | Chess | 267 | 2015-10-30 09:34 |
Vote Chess game 1: the post snort'em | Brian-E | Chess | 36 | 2014-01-23 16:22 |
Vote Chess: Game 1 | henryzz | Chess | 306 | 2013-07-08 18:29 |