Team drive #9 k=1005-2000 n=50K-350K

[mdettweiler]

Originally Posted by Mini-Geek

Edit: ninja'd

???

[Mini-Geek]

Originally Posted by mdettweiler

???

It means that someone posted the exact same thing before I did and I didn't know about it, making mine basically a useless double post. I suppose that in a context like this where two people are agreeing on something, it's not quite the same as it usually is (like answering a simple question).

[mdettweiler]

David, the progress report for port 9000 seems to be frozen at two hours ago (8:00 A.M. Arizona time).

[IronBits]

I missed a script
But, it's all better now

[mdettweiler]

Originally Posted by IronBits

I missed a script
But, it's all better now

Thanks--looks good now.

[IronBits]

Now that I'm home, folks can crank it up a notch
For comparison, the 10 cores I have on it now are comprised from
4 cores from a Q9450 and
4 cores from a Q6600
2 cores from a E8500.

[gd_barnes]

Originally Posted by mdettweiler

Hmm, I see what you're saying. And I can say that it would be nice not to have to continually worry about uploading new manual files for yet another team drive every time we reload the server.

But, how about this: we allow manual reservations, but not pre-posted; files would instead be available on request--sort of like what we did at the end of the 1st and 3rd Drives. That way, we can have manual reservations, yet essentially without any extra admin hassle than it would normally be to reload a server.

Max

Originally Posted by Mini-Geek

I think at the very least, you should allow specific manual reservations, but I don't see a need to post files before they're requested. (i.e. don't bother posting manual files without a reservation, but allow manual reservations and send the file when someone does)
Edit: ninja'd

I agree with this. I don't have time to edit the 1st post now but yes, we can allow manual reservations upon request.


Gary

[IronBits]

Port 9000 looks like it can handle double what it is now.
sockets start at 6, saw it go up to 10 once, then back down to 6 as it handles the connections flawlessly.
I'm very happy with this llrnet server performance under CentOS 64bit.

We have completed 44475 so far, it has about double that left to go, so I wouldn't be surprised if we run out by morning.

[IronBits]

We completed 56546 in 16 hours

[em99010pepe]

Better add more work.

[IronBits]

63,398 total for all servers, a new record!

http://stats.ironbits.net/statsnew/stats_by_date.php