mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2017-10-24, 06:10   #1
retina
Undefined
 
retina's Avatar
 
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair

11010010000002 Posts
Default PRP double checks are also included in the first time list

The following link shows a PRP-D check even though check box "Exclude double-check assignments" is selected.

https://www.mersenne.org/assignments...xtf=1&exdchk=1

It is currently at 95.6% so it might disappear by the time someone reads this post, but the problem will still exist for other tests.

Also selecting "Exclude first-time LL assignments" will not exclude first time PRP results. I can see that as being strictly "correct" but I think it is not the intention. I imagine the "LL" in the label is just a hangover from before PRPs were introduced.

https://www.mersenne.org/assignments...&exp1=1&extf=1

Last fiddled with by retina on 2017-10-24 at 06:11 Reason: Plurals, how do they work?
retina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-10-24, 14:56   #2
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

200716 Posts
Default

Fixed.
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-10-27, 20:20   #3
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

23×431 Posts
Default

This seems to be another bug, it says "Cofactor PRP" even though it came up as composite:
https://mersenne.org/M7508981
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-10-27, 21:12   #4
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

3·863 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
This seems to be another bug, it says "Cofactor PRP" even though it came up as composite:
https://mersenne.org/M7508981
That's just the title of the section where PRP cofactor test residues are displayed. If it's confusing, perhaps some different label could be proposed.
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-10-27, 22:37   #5
Prime95
P90 years forever!
 
Prime95's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL

200078 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
This seems to be another bug, it says "Cofactor PRP" even though it came up as composite:
https://mersenne.org/M7508981
Aaron, probably meant "cofactor PRP" as the work type being reported in this part of the table. Perhaps it should say "Cofactor testing" or "Cofactor PRP testing" instead.

Note to ATH, you need to submit this result manually as lines containing Mxxx/known_factors is not handled properly in version 29.3.
Prime95 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-10-29, 00:45   #6
ATH
Einyen
 
ATH's Avatar
 
Dec 2003
Denmark

23×431 Posts
Default

There is a warning when entering manuel PRP results, but it seems to work still:

Quote:
Found 2 lines to process.
processing: PRP=(true) for M5240707/75392810903
Notice: Array to string conversion in C:\inetpub\v5\v5server\gimps\0.95_prime_notification.inc.php on line 287 Notice: Array to string conversion in C:\inetpub\v5\v5server\gimps\0.95_prime_notification.inc.php on line 287
CPU credit is 0.9288 GHz-days.


Edit: I might have spoken too soon. I tried to turn in this result as a PRP-CF-DC:

UID: athath/ec2-1xc, M7000057/known_factors is not prime. RES64: F72E05925E4EAF75. Wf8: E6208BD3,00000000
Known factors used for PRP test were: 3573669099641,149914662723743,206900180744897,1007137541960348551

for exponent https://mersenne.org/M7000057 , but the reply from manually submit was:

processing: PRP=(false) for M7000057/3573669099641/149914662723743/206900180744897/1007137541960348551
Error code: 40, error text: Another computer has already reported this PRP result for M7000057

Last fiddled with by ATH on 2017-10-29 at 00:50
ATH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2017-10-29, 01:31   #7
GP2
 
GP2's Avatar
 
Sep 2003

1010000111012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATH View Post
processing: PRP=(false) for M7000057/3573669099641/149914662723743/206900180744897/1007137541960348551
Error code: 40, error text: Another computer has already reported this PRP result for M7000057
This is because you are using v29.3, and that version always uses a shift count of zero for PRP tests. So your result wasn't accepted as a true double-check, because I did the first PRP test on that exponent myself, and also used v29.3 for it.

There are also other problems with using 29.3 for PRP cofactor testing, as you discovered. The upcoming version 29.4 will do PRP testing properly, including a random shift count. I sent you a private message about it.

Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2017-10-29 at 01:51
GP2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Double checks casmith789 PrimeNet 7 2015-05-26 00:53
Double-checks under M24xxxxxx DW52 PrimeNet 7 2011-04-07 04:47
Why do I get double-checks on this machine? Kaboom PrimeNet 3 2011-01-21 15:27
Double checks Rastus Data 1 2003-12-19 18:20
Double-checks come in pairs? BigRed Software 1 2002-10-20 05:29

All times are UTC. The time now is 00:19.


Fri Mar 31 00:19:49 UTC 2023 up 224 days, 21:48, 1 user, load averages: 0.68, 0.78, 0.81

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.

≠ ± ∓ ÷ × · − √ ‰ ⊗ ⊕ ⊖ ⊘ ⊙ ≤ ≥ ≦ ≧ ≨ ≩ ≺ ≻ ≼ ≽ ⊏ ⊐ ⊑ ⊒ ² ³ °
∠ ∟ ° ≅ ~ ‖ ⟂ ⫛
≡ ≜ ≈ ∝ ∞ ≪ ≫ ⌊⌋ ⌈⌉ ∘ ∏ ∐ ∑ ∧ ∨ ∩ ∪ ⨀ ⊕ ⊗ 𝖕 𝖖 𝖗 ⊲ ⊳
∅ ∖ ∁ ↦ ↣ ∩ ∪ ⊆ ⊂ ⊄ ⊊ ⊇ ⊃ ⊅ ⊋ ⊖ ∈ ∉ ∋ ∌ ℕ ℤ ℚ ℝ ℂ ℵ ℶ ℷ ℸ 𝓟
¬ ∨ ∧ ⊕ → ← ⇒ ⇐ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∄ ∴ ∵ ⊤ ⊥ ⊢ ⊨ ⫤ ⊣ … ⋯ ⋮ ⋰ ⋱
∫ ∬ ∭ ∮ ∯ ∰ ∇ ∆ δ ∂ ℱ ℒ ℓ
𝛢𝛼 𝛣𝛽 𝛤𝛾 𝛥𝛿 𝛦𝜀𝜖 𝛧𝜁 𝛨𝜂 𝛩𝜃𝜗 𝛪𝜄 𝛫𝜅 𝛬𝜆 𝛭𝜇 𝛮𝜈 𝛯𝜉 𝛰𝜊 𝛱𝜋 𝛲𝜌 𝛴𝜎𝜍 𝛵𝜏 𝛶𝜐 𝛷𝜙𝜑 𝛸𝜒 𝛹𝜓 𝛺𝜔