![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Undefined
"The unspeakable one"
Jun 2006
My evil lair
11010010000002 Posts |
![]()
The following link shows a PRP-D check even though check box "Exclude double-check assignments" is selected.
https://www.mersenne.org/assignments...xtf=1&exdchk=1 It is currently at 95.6% so it might disappear by the time someone reads this post, but the problem will still exist for other tests. Also selecting "Exclude first-time LL assignments" will not exclude first time PRP results. I can see that as being strictly "correct" but I think it is not the intention. I imagine the "LL" in the label is just a hangover from before PRPs were introduced. https://www.mersenne.org/assignments...&exp1=1&extf=1 Last fiddled with by retina on 2017-10-24 at 06:11 Reason: Plurals, how do they work? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
200716 Posts |
![]()
Fixed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
23×431 Posts |
![]()
This seems to be another bug, it says "Cofactor PRP" even though it came up as composite:
https://mersenne.org/M7508981 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Sep 2003
3·863 Posts |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
P90 years forever!
Aug 2002
Yeehaw, FL
200078 Posts |
![]() Quote:
Note to ATH, you need to submit this result manually as lines containing Mxxx/known_factors is not handled properly in version 29.3. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Einyen
Dec 2003
Denmark
23×431 Posts |
![]()
There is a warning when entering manuel PRP results, but it seems to work still:
Quote:
Edit: I might have spoken too soon. I tried to turn in this result as a PRP-CF-DC: UID: athath/ec2-1xc, M7000057/known_factors is not prime. RES64: F72E05925E4EAF75. Wf8: E6208BD3,00000000 Known factors used for PRP test were: 3573669099641,149914662723743,206900180744897,1007137541960348551 for exponent https://mersenne.org/M7000057 , but the reply from manually submit was: processing: PRP=(false) for M7000057/3573669099641/149914662723743/206900180744897/1007137541960348551 Error code: 40, error text: Another computer has already reported this PRP result for M7000057 Last fiddled with by ATH on 2017-10-29 at 00:50 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Sep 2003
1010000111012 Posts |
![]() Quote:
There are also other problems with using 29.3 for PRP cofactor testing, as you discovered. The upcoming version 29.4 will do PRP testing properly, including a random shift count. I sent you a private message about it. Last fiddled with by GP2 on 2017-10-29 at 01:51 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Double checks | casmith789 | PrimeNet | 7 | 2015-05-26 00:53 |
Double-checks under M24xxxxxx | DW52 | PrimeNet | 7 | 2011-04-07 04:47 |
Why do I get double-checks on this machine? | Kaboom | PrimeNet | 3 | 2011-01-21 15:27 |
Double checks | Rastus | Data | 1 | 2003-12-19 18:20 |
Double-checks come in pairs? | BigRed | Software | 1 | 2002-10-20 05:29 |