mersenneforum.org > Data Strategic Double Clicking
 Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

2015-07-28, 18:01   #78
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

1100110111012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo I'm working on a new list now. I realized there was a little problem in my query... nothing serious. Just that some Primenet v4 entries have a "null" as the legacy computer name, and I was actually keying on that being null or not to see if it was a v4 or v5 machine. I've modified it and as a result I may find additional legacy systems to include.
Treating "null" legacy computer names appropriately didn't really add too much. Most of the entries like that had lots of good ones and didn't really have tons of bad stuff. There were maybe 5 add'l "bad" machines in the list accounting for a handful of exponents (all of which I think are currently assigned anyway).

Here's a list of 50 more though. Exponents where the machine has either (good=0 and bad >= 3) or (bad > good*3):

Code:
exponent	Bad	Good	Unk	Sus	worktodo
34680487	19	5	15	7	DoubleCheck=34680487,71,1
34852141	19	5	15	7	DoubleCheck=34852141,71,1
34968539	4	1	7	2	DoubleCheck=34968539,71,1
35068729	8	2	6	1	DoubleCheck=35068729,71,1
35186419	4	1	2	1	DoubleCheck=35186419,71,1
35653117	19	5	15	7	DoubleCheck=35653117,71,1
35792423	19	5	15	7	DoubleCheck=35792423,71,1
35938541	8	2	6	1	DoubleCheck=35938541,71,1
36568277	19	5	15	7	DoubleCheck=36568277,71,1
36771491	4	1	2	2	DoubleCheck=36771491,71,1
37034737	19	5	15	7	DoubleCheck=37034737,71,1
37272679	14	4	5	5	DoubleCheck=37272679,71,1
37478869	10	3	12	1	DoubleCheck=37478869,71,1
37532009	4	1	8	1	DoubleCheck=37532009,71,1
40882241	10	2	15	8	DoubleCheck=40882241,72,1
40904273	4	1	12	0	DoubleCheck=40904273,72,1
40930163	4	1	5	3	DoubleCheck=40930163,72,1
40944077	18	5	2	0	DoubleCheck=40944077,72,1
40981987	19	5	15	7	DoubleCheck=40981987,72,1
41352907	13	3	5	3	DoubleCheck=41352907,72,1
41397359	4	1	12	0	DoubleCheck=41397359,72,1
41501183	5	1	4	0	DoubleCheck=41501183,72,1
41542901	7	2	5	0	DoubleCheck=41542901,72,1
41572033	4	0	28	1	DoubleCheck=41572033,72,1
41573579	17	2	6	3	DoubleCheck=41573579,72,1
41585389	4	1	8	1	DoubleCheck=41585389,72,1
41618251	10	3	12	1	DoubleCheck=41618251,72,1
41620973	11	2	1	8	DoubleCheck=41620973,72,1
41626679	11	2	6	10	DoubleCheck=41626679,72,1
41678927	17	2	6	3	DoubleCheck=41678927,72,1
41713033	4	1	12	0	DoubleCheck=41713033,72,1
42005081	7	2	5	0	DoubleCheck=42005081,72,1
42019207	5	1	9	2	DoubleCheck=42019207,72,1
42022873	10	2	15	8	DoubleCheck=42022873,72,1
42100753	39	9	13	18	DoubleCheck=42100753,72,1
42222599	4	1	8	1	DoubleCheck=42222599,72,1
42237521	14	4	5	5	DoubleCheck=42237521,72,1
42240043	20	4	5	3	DoubleCheck=42240043,72,1
42279269	15	1	3	4	DoubleCheck=42279269,72,1
42324563	14	2	4	8	DoubleCheck=42324563,72,1
42376109	10	3	12	1	DoubleCheck=42376109,72,1
43428943	4	1	12	0	DoubleCheck=43428943,72,1
45923561	4	1	5	3	DoubleCheck=45923561,72,1
55306079	39	9	13	18	DoubleCheck=55306079,73,1
55306243	39	9	13	18	DoubleCheck=55306243,73,1
55392221	3	0	4	3	DoubleCheck=55392221,73,1
55397983	16	2	29	14	DoubleCheck=55397983,73,1
56341511	3	0	4	3	DoubleCheck=56341511,73,1
56761349	16	2	29	14	DoubleCheck=56761349,73,1
56769421	16	2	29	14	DoubleCheck=56769421,73,1

Last fiddled with by Madpoo on 2015-07-28 at 18:01

 2015-07-28, 19:03 #79 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 55638 Posts From Madpoo's list in post #17, all the exponents (56M,58M) are now fully trial factored: DoubleCheck=56066851,74,1 DoubleCheck=56114683,74,1 DoubleCheck=56123623,73,1 DoubleCheck=56140543,73,1 DoubleCheck=56152813,73,1 DoubleCheck=56153221,73,1 DoubleCheck=56153731,73,1 DoubleCheck=56155243,73,1 DoubleCheck=56174539,73,1 DoubleCheck=56191063,74,1 DoubleCheck=56198677,73,1 DoubleCheck=56233799,73,1 DoubleCheck=56234723,74,1 DoubleCheck=56238131,73,1 DoubleCheck=56251597,73,1 DoubleCheck=56270477,74,1 DoubleCheck=56291761,73,1 DoubleCheck=56301781,73,1 DoubleCheck=56302951,73,1 DoubleCheck=56303309,74,1 DoubleCheck=56316023,73,1 DoubleCheck=56318287,73,1 DoubleCheck=56330089,74,1 DoubleCheck=56341039,74,1 DoubleCheck=56341069,74,1 DoubleCheck=56348293,73,1 DoubleCheck=56348329,73,1 DoubleCheck=56377691,73,1 DoubleCheck=56382917,73,1 DoubleCheck=56406829,73,1 DoubleCheck=56412943,74,1 DoubleCheck=56420057,74,1 DoubleCheck=56420477,74,1 DoubleCheck=56447749,74,1 DoubleCheck=56468263,73,1 DoubleCheck=56507819,73,1 DoubleCheck=56523427,74,1 DoubleCheck=56524151,73,1 DoubleCheck=56539541,73,1 DoubleCheck=56554453,73,1 DoubleCheck=56555581,73,1 DoubleCheck=56556187,74,1 DoubleCheck=56556767,74,1 DoubleCheck=56558023,73,1 DoubleCheck=56561341,74,1 DoubleCheck=56583407,73,1 DoubleCheck=56617061,73,1 DoubleCheck=56621053,74,1 DoubleCheck=56621099,74,1 DoubleCheck=56689639,73,1 DoubleCheck=56703797,73,1 DoubleCheck=56704411,73,1 DoubleCheck=56714327,74,1 DoubleCheck=56715653,73,1 DoubleCheck=56752879,73,1 DoubleCheck=56753273,73,1 DoubleCheck=56800829,74,1 DoubleCheck=56838473,74,1 DoubleCheck=56852687,73,1 DoubleCheck=56868491,73,1 DoubleCheck=56870449,73,1 DoubleCheck=56871487,73,1 DoubleCheck=56926871,73,1 DoubleCheck=56934463,73,1 DoubleCheck=56953073,73,1 DoubleCheck=56974039,73,1 DoubleCheck=56975939,74,1 DoubleCheck=56985451,74,1 DoubleCheck=56990413,74,1 DoubleCheck=56997691,74,1 DoubleCheck=57000329,74,1 DoubleCheck=57017123,73,1 DoubleCheck=57032629,73,1 DoubleCheck=57055759,74,1 DoubleCheck=57058711,73,1 DoubleCheck=57086539,74,1 DoubleCheck=57086573,74,1 DoubleCheck=57090923,74,1 DoubleCheck=57090931,73,1 DoubleCheck=57091109,74,1 DoubleCheck=57110177,73,1 DoubleCheck=57139189,73,1 DoubleCheck=57160193,73,1 DoubleCheck=57200413,74,1 DoubleCheck=57206161,74,1 DoubleCheck=57207373,73,1 DoubleCheck=57208741,74,1 DoubleCheck=57246751,74,1 DoubleCheck=57248761,73,1 DoubleCheck=57248981,74,1 DoubleCheck=57266147,73,1 DoubleCheck=57269221,73,1 DoubleCheck=57270149,74,1 DoubleCheck=57290173,73,1 DoubleCheck=57293443,73,1 DoubleCheck=57310541,74,1 DoubleCheck=57320843,73,1 DoubleCheck=57352369,74,1 DoubleCheck=57363203,74,1 DoubleCheck=57370591,73,1 DoubleCheck=57379519,73,1 DoubleCheck=57383791,74,1 DoubleCheck=57412753,73,1 DoubleCheck=57424993,74,1 DoubleCheck=57462527,74,1 DoubleCheck=57466907,74,1 DoubleCheck=57472673,73,1 DoubleCheck=57512177,74,1 DoubleCheck=57526771,73,1 DoubleCheck=57528319,74,1 DoubleCheck=57538057,74,1 DoubleCheck=57563417,74,1 DoubleCheck=57578579,73,1 DoubleCheck=57591283,73,1 DoubleCheck=57612227,74,1 DoubleCheck=57616457,73,1 DoubleCheck=57647329,73,1 DoubleCheck=57650933,74,1 DoubleCheck=57686581,73,1 DoubleCheck=57721933,74,1 DoubleCheck=57752603,74,1 DoubleCheck=57759731,73,1 DoubleCheck=57773579,73,1 DoubleCheck=57797717,73,1 DoubleCheck=57798791,75,1 DoubleCheck=57798857,75,1 DoubleCheck=57815321,73,1 DoubleCheck=57829861,73,1 DoubleCheck=57846857,73,1 DoubleCheck=57860441,73,1 DoubleCheck=57865001,73,1 DoubleCheck=57866573,73,1 DoubleCheck=57869209,74,1 DoubleCheck=57878021,74,1 DoubleCheck=57880943,73,1 DoubleCheck=57890233,73,1 DoubleCheck=57896317,73,1 DoubleCheck=57901159,73,1 DoubleCheck=57908723,73,1 DoubleCheck=57910667,73,1 DoubleCheck=57910703,73,1 DoubleCheck=57917443,73,1 DoubleCheck=57925729,73,1 DoubleCheck=57927973,73,1 DoubleCheck=57929611,73,1 DoubleCheck=57936041,73,1 DoubleCheck=57951667,73,1 DoubleCheck=57957623,73,1 DoubleCheck=57982069,76,1 DoubleCheck=57982157,73,1 DoubleCheck=57989489,73,1 DoubleCheck=57995393,73,1 There are five additional exponents in subsequent posts that are not in this list. Three of them are in the previous post just now. I haven't checked to see if there was any additional trial factoring done outside this project, nor if the exponents are already assigned. I'll post a new list every one to three days, depending on how quickly I finish the TF'ing above 50M. Last fiddled with by Mark Rose on 2015-07-28 at 19:05
2015-07-28, 21:13   #80
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

1100110111012 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose From Madpoo's list in post #17, all the exponents (56M,58M) are now fully trial factored:
As a reminder (I forgot what these were too)...

These were from a list of exponents where they'd been done twice already and needed triple-checking.

One or the other of the results for these is bad, but unknown which one.

Testing these is tangential to targeting exponents where only one test has been done by a suspect machine, but in these cases with 2 tests so far, there's a good chance one of those is correct.

What I'd like to do is come up with a list of these "double-checked but still unverified" exponents and come up with a list of those where *both* computers that did the test are suspect. However I was having a little hiccup wrapping my head around how best to do that query so I've put it off for now. I'm grabbing all of these that I can and just doing a triple-check on all of them (I've pulled all of them below 35.2M I think)... it'd take me a while to get all of them below 58M done though. :) ~ 2500 of those below 58M. 3092 of them total (including > 58M)

By the way, not that we're keeping score or anything, but so far I now have 81 exponents where my result (presumably correct?) didn't match any of the previous runs. (some are assigned, and I think 58 are unassigned for a new test)

There are 3 needing quintuple checks, 14 needing quad checks, and then the rest needing a triple check.

These 2 are still unassigned and need a quint check if anyone is feeling bold:
36742943
46013437

That first one might not technically count... it was one of the odd ones where the same user submitted their result (same shift count) multiple times.

2015-07-28, 22:13   #81
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

293110 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo What I'd like to do is come up with a list of these "double-checked but still unverified" exponents and come up with a list of those where *both* computers that did the test are suspect. However I was having a little hiccup wrapping my head around how best to do that query so I've put it off for now.
SELECT exponent FROM results WHERE <computer bad> GROUP BY exponent HAVING COUNT(exponent) > 1

Something like that oughta work :)

Quote:
 I'm grabbing all of these that I can and just doing a triple-check on all of them (I've pulled all of them below 35.2M I think)... it'd take me a while to get all of them below 58M done though. :) ~ 2500 of those below 58M. 3092 of them total (including > 58M)
Don't you have like a thousand cores or something? Surely it couldn't take too long... ;)

Quote:
 These 2 are still unassigned and need a quint check if anyone is feeling bold: 36742943 46013437
Mine now. Should be done in a few days. Stealing cycles from my SoB work lol

Last fiddled with by Mark Rose on 2015-07-28 at 22:15

 2015-07-28, 22:25 #82 frmky     Jul 2003 So Cal 2·3·349 Posts The last four from my original reservation of eight are done. 34665871 matched while 34671661, 34686947, and 34691149 did not. From the subsequent reservations, 4 are done. 34865477 matched while 34769731, 36589351, and 36717713 did not.
2015-07-28, 22:28   #83
Serpentine Vermin Jar

Jul 2014

37·89 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose SELECT exponent FROM results WHERE GROUP BY exponent HAVING COUNT(exponent) > 1 Something like that oughta work :)
Yeah, my query has a lot of other stuff going on, but I guess if I use the same "bad" criteria that would work for the most part.

Doing that, with the same thresholds for bad machines, I get just one exponent, and it's already assigned. :(
38497531

With slightly looser thresholds I get this one, also assigned:
35414699

It's the same user who did both checks... I already picked up all the unassigned exponents matching those. I figure if a user didn't get it right the first time, how confident am I they'll be right the second time?

2015-07-28, 22:45   #84
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

2×4,787 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Mark Rose I'll post a new list every one to three days, depending on how quickly I finish the TF'ing above 50M.
Gosh... If LaurV doesn't get back in the game soon you're quickly going to pass him in the stats!

2015-07-28, 23:43   #85
Mark Rose

"/X\(‘-‘)/X\"
Jan 2013

3×977 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by chalsall Gosh... If LaurV doesn't get back in the game soon you're quickly going to pass him in the stats!
Shh.... don't wake him...

 2015-07-29, 12:25 #86 chalsall If I May     "Chris Halsall" Sep 2002 Barbados 2×4,787 Posts OK, the last two from my first batch of 14 have completed. 43207327 matched, 49520501 didn't. The next twelve from my second batch of 47 have also completed. 35662219, 35963243, 36273859, 36503917 and 36648539 matched. 35006537, 35159191, 36026687, 36138559, 36392009, 36536707 and 36688991 didn't. Aaron... Should we keep posting the results here, or will your queries just take into account the new data to refine the statistics for the suspect machines?
2015-07-29, 14:07   #87
chalsall
If I May

"Chris Halsall"
Sep 2002

256616 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Madpoo Here's a list of 50 more though. Exponents where the machine has either (good=0 and bad >= 3) or (bad > good*3):
OK, I've just taken all of these.

 2015-07-29, 14:12 #88 Mark Rose     "/X\(‘-‘)/X\" Jan 2013 3×977 Posts The 55M exponents from post #17 are ready: DoubleCheck=55075387,73,1 DoubleCheck=55091521,73,1 DoubleCheck=55100509,73,1 DoubleCheck=55110421,73,1 DoubleCheck=55112119,73,1 DoubleCheck=55131227,73,1 DoubleCheck=55134139,73,1 DoubleCheck=55137587,73,1 DoubleCheck=55197383,73,1 DoubleCheck=55203487,73,1 DoubleCheck=55213993,73,1 DoubleCheck=55235711,74,1 DoubleCheck=55245227,73,1 DoubleCheck=55249981,73,1 DoubleCheck=55250353,73,1 DoubleCheck=55277483,73,1 DoubleCheck=55304789,73,1 DoubleCheck=55380629,73,1 DoubleCheck=55390507,74,1 DoubleCheck=55404101,73,1 DoubleCheck=55410991,73,1 DoubleCheck=55467701,73,1 DoubleCheck=55474831,73,1 DoubleCheck=55477861,73,1 DoubleCheck=55481191,73,1 DoubleCheck=55510541,73,1 DoubleCheck=55526041,73,1 DoubleCheck=55531279,74,1 DoubleCheck=55547719,73,1 DoubleCheck=55551827,74,1 DoubleCheck=55570813,73,1 DoubleCheck=55584869,73,1 DoubleCheck=55610531,73,1 DoubleCheck=55625953,73,1 DoubleCheck=55627493,74,1 DoubleCheck=55638719,73,1 DoubleCheck=55643017,73,1 DoubleCheck=55659697,73,1 DoubleCheck=55660051,74,1 DoubleCheck=55675049,73,1 DoubleCheck=55693711,74,1 DoubleCheck=55696681,74,1 DoubleCheck=55700563,73,1 DoubleCheck=55741409,73,1 DoubleCheck=55764517,73,1 DoubleCheck=55780817,73,1 DoubleCheck=55791137,74,1 DoubleCheck=55799053,73,1 DoubleCheck=55802897,73,1 DoubleCheck=55815013,73,1 DoubleCheck=55817737,73,1 DoubleCheck=55817789,74,1 DoubleCheck=55817869,73,1 DoubleCheck=55818001,73,1 DoubleCheck=55864219,73,1 DoubleCheck=55875761,73,1 DoubleCheck=55876199,73,1 DoubleCheck=55889903,74,1 DoubleCheck=55891183,73,1 DoubleCheck=55895927,73,1 DoubleCheck=55898959,73,1 DoubleCheck=55900433,74,1 DoubleCheck=55914011,74,1 DoubleCheck=55922969,73,1 DoubleCheck=55926331,73,1 DoubleCheck=55975757,74,1 DoubleCheck=55981307,74,1 DoubleCheck=55981963,73,1 DoubleCheck=55993829,73,1 If there's no point in me posting these lists, let me know :)

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Mysticial Software 52 2021-04-23 06:51 marigonzes Information & Answers 2 2017-02-14 16:56 jasong jasong 7 2015-08-17 10:56 137ben PrimeNet 6 2012-03-13 04:01 Uncwilly Puzzles 8 2006-07-03 16:02

All times are UTC. The time now is 02:58.

Thu May 13 02:58:36 UTC 2021 up 34 days, 21:39, 1 user, load averages: 3.34, 3.47, 3.38