mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > PrimeNet

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2012-07-01, 21:12   #1
kracker
ἀβουλία
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

32×241 Posts
Default Am I doing it wrong?

Okay, I was bored and was poking around and I found this on my factors found with TF:
It says I found the factor with P-1, when I actually did it with TF
Code:
kracker Manual testing 31321219 F-PM1 2012-07-01 20:15 0.0 325236569986535729617   1.3727
...The others are fine.
Code:
kracker Manual testing 3125237 NF 2012-07-01 18:390.0 no factor for M31252379 from 2^68 to 2^69 [mfakto 0.11-Win barrett15_75_2]   1.9129
Maybe I'm doing something wrong or this is normal? Thanks
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 21:52   #2
c10ck3r
 
c10ck3r's Avatar
 
Aug 2010
Kansas

547 Posts
Default

31,321,219 is not very close to 3,125,237...is it possible the first WAS actually P-1?

Edit: You might consider upgrading to mfaktc 0.17 or 0.18 as well...

Last fiddled with by c10ck3r on 2012-07-01 at 21:54 Reason: add suggestion
c10ck3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 21:53   #3
Dubslow
Basketry That Evening!
 
Dubslow's Avatar
 
"Bunslow the Bold"
Jun 2011
40<A<43 -89<O<-88

722110 Posts
Default

No, this is a long- and well- known problem with PrimeNet's results parser. It completely ignores what program reported the factor and guesses the work type based solely on the size of the factor: anything beyond the default P95 TF, which is everything that GPU272 does, is presumed to be P-1.

James is working on fixing it.
Dubslow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2012-07-01, 22:35   #4
kracker
ἀβουλία
 
kracker's Avatar
 
"Mr. Meeseeks"
Jan 2012
California, USA

32·241 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c10ck3r View Post
Edit: You might consider upgrading to mfaktc 0.17 or 0.18 as well...
I run mfakto, not mfaktc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dubslow View Post
No, this is a long- and well- known problem with PrimeNet's results parser. It completely ignores what program reported the factor and guesses the work type based solely on the size of the factor: anything beyond the default P95 TF, which is everything that GPU272 does, is presumed to be P-1.

James is working on fixing it.
Ah ok, Thanks!
kracker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Moore's Law wrong, or is it wrong-headed (6th time around) jasong jasong 12 2016-05-27 11:01
what I do wrong pepi37 Linux 4 2015-07-12 09:13
something wrong with my RAM? ixfd64 Hardware 13 2010-07-17 20:49
Something is very wrong... RhymeBomb Information & Answers 7 2010-02-28 09:53
something wrong here? ixfd64 Lounge 2 2007-09-17 13:20

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:07.

Tue Jan 19 14:07:50 UTC 2021 up 47 days, 10:19, 0 users, load averages: 1.45, 1.59, 1.47

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.