20171024, 17:19  #2212 
Jun 2012
2·1,429 Posts 
Reserving C224_122_119 for postprocessing.

20171025, 15:46  #2213 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California
3×379 Posts 
Reserving C192_1577431459_23 please.

20171025, 19:17  #2214 
Jul 2003
So Cal
2,039 Posts 
C226_141_59 is done.
Code:
p84 factor: 362717407573062759649737199143733658562292627766699815889194128031404204438544404439 p142 factor: 5584640606072561151802930019243122240833798331945858851893157042850138505313340336371766706494184014505008264594637551042137666886143607864541 
20171026, 13:21  #2215 
Jun 2012
101100101010_{2} Posts 
Reserving 141^62+64^141 on 15e.

20171027, 16:03  #2216 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
5^{2}×173 Posts 
c226_143_57 results
Log at https://pastebin.com/Dw1swigP
Code:
prp96 factor: 897094747754482045770531544477700088352397640594837413588145052113208015535658806042142533635811 prp130 factor: 5402116304783573647710016304889406303241500724198159102155379461705248829675304254503761226405413342784878208865325882006231555611 This was my first 14e/33 job, and 590M unique relations (of roughly 720M raw) were far too many. Future 14/33 jobs should target 650680M raw relations. 
20171027, 16:46  #2217 
Sep 2008
Kansas
2^{2}×3×7×37 Posts 
Taking C169_2158316902961_17 next.

20171027, 17:04  #2218 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
6,361 Posts 
I'm not quite sure why you suggest that, rather than increasing the target density (you were running with the default target density 70)

20171031, 04:26  #2219  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
4325_{10} Posts 
Quote:
1. After experimenting with a few filtering runs with varying relation counts (see http://mersenneforum.org/showpost.ph...postcount=1186), I accidentally forgot to set TD on the full set, saw the matrix was the same size I got from the first filtering run with TD set to 140, and let it run without realizing I hadn't set TD 2. I edit/cut the log to delete the filtering runs irrelevant to the actual job, and accidentally deleted the targetdensity line. Based on the post linked above, I'm quite sure I had target_density set during my trials. However, on my current LA job I tried what I suggested two posts up, and the ETA (after 1% of the job, about 4 hrs) for the smallest matrix I could build with density matching my target density (I used 134) was about 5% longer than the ETA of the matrix I got from the full relation set, even though that matrix is density 104 when much higher was requested. More specifically, 360M unique 32LP relations built a 19.0M matrix with density 104, while 339M unique relations produced a 17.0M matrix with density 134. The former matrix has a shorter ETA, after letting both run about 4 hrs so the ETA estimate settled down. Interesting tidbit: 340M unique rels and TD=134 built a 17.9M matrix at density 132, while 338M unique rels and TD = 132 built a 17.1M matrix. Tidbit #2: 333M unique rels and TD = 140 failed, as did 337M rels and TD = 136. On this dataset, TD over 134 was nearly impossible to build, and matrices were MUCH more sensitive to input # of rels than I expected. I'll be using TD = 132 as my default for a while, and also running similar experiments on future 14/32 jobs. Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 20171031 at 04:28 

20171031, 04:29  #2220 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
5^{2}·173 Posts 
Reserving 3408:1671 from 15e.

20171031, 15:42  #2221 
Sep 2008
Kansas
3108_{10} Posts 
C169_2158316902961_17 factored
84 hours to solve a 11.3M matrix using t 4, TD=120. (TD=124 failed)
Code:
p58 factor: 5021316583534880940885444734079370333361932652310779490947 p112 factor: 1214281023169276509053011690942441596344967221458926915648042712870516387083258213891473300070212158822642727987 
20171031, 17:02  #2222 
Jun 2012
2×1,429 Posts 
Someone pointed out to me the typo here  this should be listed as
141^62+62^141. It’s listed as the above on the 15e status page. Don’t think it matters, just clarifying which number is being factored. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
restarting nfs linear algebra  cubaq  YAFU  2  20170402 11:35 
Linear algebra at 600%  CRGreathouse  Msieve  8  20090805 07:25 
Linear algebra crashes  10metreh  Msieve  3  20090202 08:34 
Linear algebra proof  Damian  Math  8  20070212 22:25 
Linear algebra in MPQS  R1zZ1  Factoring  2  20070202 06:45 