20070221, 08:45  #342 
Aug 2003
Europe
2·97 Posts 
Paul, that is indeed good news. Although 3+2_458 and 5+3_286 stood no chance ofcourse against the running ECMnet 2.7.3 client loaded with GMPECM 6.1.2. I saw that we moved on to the B1=1000000 range which hopefully will find large factors of the remaining composites.

20070221, 10:40  #343 
May 2003
231_{10} Posts 

20070221, 11:52  #344  
Nov 2003
2^{2}·5·373 Posts 
5,4,233+
Quote:
44056865223375581641444494642068764223329664149961 17057488043468155908911647027886752861361432731788610257859303 5,4,232+ is nearly sieved. 5,4,239+ and 5,4,239 will follow. 

20070221, 14:41  #345 
May 2003
3×7×11 Posts 
Does someone want to get me up to speed. I can't see a simple summary in this thread, and it looks like people are looking outide the range listed in :
http://www.leyland.vispa.com/numth/f.../anbn/main.htm What ranges are of interest in 4^n+3^n? For example, if you're going beyond 350, then n=351 has this: (and this was completely trivial, ten minutes work on an old P3) Code:
? C=subst(polcyclo(702),x,3/4)*4^eulerphi(702) 11918373797533701570043364702426895921596861568814732254151942914041772942209494877872906695265479347288410269727764182956919754721 ? C==(314642719 * 3487347163 * 25876141241263871115871 * 6176913048463443825557539 * 496737950461620637069 * 136806203355749662909017142119554851933674613) 1 I'm interested in the ranges for pretty much all of the tables (it's too hard to describe the ones I'm not interested in). 
20070221, 15:13  #346  
Nov 2003
2^{2}×5×373 Posts 
Quote:
While others are free to disagree, I like to follow that old saying from everyone's mom: "finish what you started before moving on to something else". Let's finish the composites in the current tables before extending them further. Of course some(many) tables are finished to their current limits. Extending them would be fine. [IMHO] 

20070221, 15:42  #347  
May 2003
3×7×11 Posts 
Quote:
It's fine by me if you all stick with the table sizes you currently have. While you're crunching and pondering, I shall just do a little playing with 4+3 on my own, just above the curent limit. I'll stop when my factorfu runs out, and mail the results to Paul. In fact, it's _BEST_ that you stick with your current table sizes, as that guarantees I won't tread on your feet, and you won't tread on mine! Good luck, and happy cracking! 

20070221, 18:05  #348 
Jul 2004
Potsdam, Germany
1100111111_{2} Posts 
Can someone provide me a Windows binary of the ECMnet client?
I have problems compiling it using MinGW. 
20070221, 18:31  #349 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the
2^{2}·5^{2}·59 Posts 

20070221, 18:49  #350  
May 2003
E7_{16} Posts 
Quote:
Does anyone have a list of which tables are complete, as it definitely makes sense for me to tackle those first? I can check each of them visually, of course, but it's a little silly wasting rediscovering what must be known already by someone else. Cheers. 

20070222, 01:42  #351 
Jul 2003
So Cal
2,039 Posts 
A few more using ggnfs...
3,2,423 40050728809665918341807625331879282725073 (pp41) 8134978908042378271803748170526239618441302677876525086103854457 (pp64) 3,2,453 6676632590964208825396334228342354209771 (pp40) 599878487246280284322128088052605483901086976792443398306028697757269834920853652059 (pp84) 3,2,477 82327127448295702472460630418829909103320083693346528705489737 (pp62) 1154997774400006696506966460097996719354572617984091577090814283607651 (pp70) Greg 
20070222, 11:12  #352  
Nov 2003
1D24_{16} Posts 
5,3,232+
Quote:
26843969937530333761249800502959894270020371382177 7610415523761447759258242192425661313539297198350880938336463550567931272741323853171836641 5,4,239+ is in progress. 5,4,239 and 5,3,244+ will follow. 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
New phi for homogeneous Cunningham numbers  wpolly  Factoring  26  20160729 04:34 
Mathematics of Cunningham Numbers (3rd ed., 2002, A.M.S.)  Xyzzy  Cunningham Tables  42  20140402 18:31 
Don't know how to work on Cunningham numbers.  jasong  GMPECM  6  20060630 08:51 
Doing Cunningham numbers but messed up.  jasong  Factoring  1  20060403 17:18 
Need help factoring Cunningham numbers  jasong  Factoring  27  20060321 02:47 