mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > FactorDB

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2018-09-02, 17:05   #1585
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

3×5×223 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
Let's see how it goes for the next few days. I'm working on an Aliquot sequence and playing with ecmpi and cado-nfs. The LA portion leaves all but one machine free. I hope to have them automatically run the db composites during that free time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterBitcoin View Post
So many small composites from Aliquot.
Trying to catch-up.

Still having 90-99 digits, also starting 81-89 now.
I've suspended my Aliquot playing for a bit and am hitting the composites with a few machines. I don't think I'll be nearly as heavily involved as I was, though.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-30, 10:20   #1586
MisterBitcoin
 
MisterBitcoin's Avatar
 
"Nuri, the dragon :P"
Jul 2016
Good old Germany

2×367 Posts
Default

Now stopping range 90 digits up to 99 digits.

Factored 19940 numbers in 1222,5 hours.
MisterBitcoin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-09-30, 16:38   #1587
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

3×5×223 Posts
Default

Thank you for all the work.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-05, 04:33   #1588
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

13·192 Posts
Default

Does anyone know why we can't move this guy to a pure N+1 proof instead of the combined proof?
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-05, 06:12   #1589
axn
 
axn's Avatar
 
Jun 2003

10010010101012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
Does anyone know why we can't move this guy to a pure N+1 proof instead of the combined proof?
Also this, this and this.
axn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-05, 21:10   #1590
wblipp
 
wblipp's Avatar
 
"William"
May 2003
New Haven

2×32×131 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axn View Post
Does anyone know why we can't move this guy to a pure N+1 proof instead of the combined proof?
The displayed results for the N-1 factorization claim to be FF, but it is missing 3^524. I'm guessing that error gums up the works someplace.
wblipp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-06, 07:09   #1591
DukeBG
 
Mar 2018

3×43 Posts
Default

huh. weird behavior
DukeBG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-29, 23:14   #1592
wpolly
 
wpolly's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Vienna, Austria

3×73 Posts
Default

Apparently some people(s) were batch-adding a huge amount of "useless" composites (for instance, thousands of consecutive 78-digit numbers starting with 8444.......). Running fdb_auto.pl to get rid of the wall at C78, and hopefully we can clear to at least C85 soon.
wpolly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-30, 00:14   #1593
VictordeHolland
 
VictordeHolland's Avatar
 
"Victor de Hollander"
Aug 2011
the Netherlands

117610 Posts
Default

This is not the first time a large batch of (useless) numbers are added to the factordb. If this starts to happen more often it might be a good idea to restrict the adding of new numbers to one each minute for unregistered users.
VictordeHolland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-10-30, 11:58   #1594
DukeBG
 
Mar 2018

8116 Posts
Default

It would be favorable and even more favorable would be a setting or tool that would allow checking numbers without creating them if they're not in DB.

Although, I doubt it will happen, since there are still bugs (like submitting factors to PRPs doesn't turn them composite and others) not getting fixed for a very long time.

Last fiddled with by DukeBG on 2018-10-30 at 11:59
DukeBG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2018-11-01, 00:29   #1595
BudgieJane
 
BudgieJane's Avatar
 
"Jane Sullivan"
Jan 2011
Beckenham, UK

2·32·13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DukeBG View Post
It would be favorable and even more favorable would be a setting or tool that would allow checking numbers without creating them if they're not in DB.

Although, I doubt it will happen, since there are still bugs (like submitting factors to PRPs doesn't turn them composite and others) not getting fixed for a very long time.
I agree. I think that a request for a number should not create it if it is not in the DB, but submitting one or more factors should create it if it does not already exist.
BudgieJane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Database for k-b-b's: 3.14159 Miscellaneous Math 325 2016-04-09 17:45
Factoring database issues Mini-Geek Factoring 5 2009-07-01 11:51
database.zip HiddenWarrior Data 1 2004-03-29 03:53
Database layout Prime95 PrimeNet 1 2003-01-18 00:49
Is there a performance database? Joe O Lounge 35 2002-09-06 20:19

All times are UTC. The time now is 04:46.

Wed Sep 23 04:46:38 UTC 2020 up 13 days, 1:57, 0 users, load averages: 1.60, 2.18, 2.30

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.