mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Factoring Projects > Aliquot Sequences

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2020-09-06, 19:01   #540
richs
 
richs's Avatar
 
"Rich"
Aug 2002
Benicia, California

1,153 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richs View Post
Taking 439^36 at i68.
439^36 is now at i148 (added 80 iterations) and a C130 level with a 2^6 * 3 * 5 * 31 guide, so I will drop this reservation. The remaining C126 term is well ecm'ed and is ready for nfs.

Taking 439^38 at i52.
richs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-06, 19:27   #541
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

33·13 Posts
Default

OK, page updated.
A lot of thanks to all for your help.





Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
In case you do an update this weekend prior to my finishing 18^119, I have otherwise completed a new row for base 18, through 18^118 at present.

I am running 18^119 and hope to have it done soon. For now, I will not be extending the table further.
Sorry Edwin, but I had done the update before reading your message! But next week, I'm going to extend base 18 to 18^129.
do you want to make reservations for this base ?

In the same way, I think to add the bases 50 (=2*5^2), 72 (=2*6^2) and 98 (=2*7^2), up to 50^95, 72^88 and 98^82.
It is an effective way to have many sequences that end because for these three bases, as for bases 2 and 18, all sequences end.

I take care of base 50 and I will add it only when I will have finished all the sequences up to 50^72.
If someone wants to do the preliminary work for bases 72 and 96, let me know here.
I believe that with these three additional bases, we will be very well equipped for our statistics in a few months...



Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
I am slowing down on the others but still randomly doing a bit of work on n=19, 20, 23, 29, 770.
RichD, do you want to make reservations for these bases ?



Quote:
Originally Posted by richs View Post
439^36 is now at i148 (added 80 iterations) and a C130 level with a 2^6 * 3 * 5 * 31 guide, so I will drop this reservation. The remaining C126 term is well ecm'ed and is ready for nfs.

Taking 439^38 at i52.
OK, got it. Thank you very much.
I'll change that in the next update.
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-06, 19:35   #542
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

33×13 Posts
Default

Please, do you manage to reproduce the same error as me, when you enter on factordb the sequence 72^89 from index 0 to 1, like this :

http://factordb.com/sequences.php?se...ange&fr=0&to=1

The answer is totally absurd, at index 0, it indicates 2^534 !!!
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-06, 21:32   #543
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

22·5·132 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
Please, do you manage to reproduce the same error as me, when you enter on factordb the sequence 72^89 from index 0 to 1, like this :

http://factordb.com/sequences.php?se...ange&fr=0&to=1

The answer is totally absurd, at index 0, it indicates 2^534 !!!
There are several others, as well:
Code:
72^71 shows 2^426
72^73 shows 2^438
72^79 shows 2^474
72^83 shows 2^498
72^79 shows 2^474
I didn't check the whole range.

I was going to offer to do the preliminaries for 72. Perhaps I should choose 98.

I had not intended to extend base 18 past 2^119 (at least, not for now), so others are free to reserve those.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-06, 21:51   #544
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

2·1,567 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
RichD, do you want to make reservations for these bases ?
No, just 770. I'll take the remainder to orange, if that is where they go...
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-07, 09:06   #545
RichD
 
RichD's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Kansas

2·1,567 Posts
Default

It looks like Table n=23 didn't get updated which includes these from above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
The following sequences terminate.
. . .
23^10
23^77
23^79
23^81
Additional terminations:
19^91
20^92
RichD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-07, 16:57   #546
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

33×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
There are several others, as well:
Code:
72^71 shows 2^426
72^73 shows 2^438
72^79 shows 2^474
72^83 shows 2^498
72^79 shows 2^474
I didn't check the whole range.

I was going to offer to do the preliminaries for 72. Perhaps I should choose 98.

I had not intended to extend base 18 past 2^119 (at least, not for now), so others are free to reserve those.

OK, thank you for checking for the malfunction for base 72. Under these conditions, it is better to leave this base aside for the moment !
A few months ago, I had reported other malfunctions on factordb, on sequences of the main project (see here). But the errors were never corrected, nor reported on the blue page. So this is likely to last ! It is indeed better to calculate the base 98 !

OK, seen for base 18.
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-07, 16:59   #547
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

15F16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
No, just 770. I'll take the remainder to orange, if that is where they go...

OK, I'll reserve the 770 base for you at the next update. Thank you very much.
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-07, 17:02   #548
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

33·13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichD View Post
It looks like Table n=23 didn't get updated which includes these from above.

Additional terminations:
19^91
20^92

I must have made a mistake on base 23. I think you're right, it hasn't been updated.
I'm sorry !
I will correct it in the next update.
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-07, 18:38   #549
EdH
 
EdH's Avatar
 
"Ed Hall"
Dec 2009
Adirondack Mtns

22×5×132 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garambois View Post
OK, thank you for checking for the malfunction for base 72. Under these conditions, it is better to leave this base aside for the moment !
A few months ago, I had reported other malfunctions on factordb, on sequences of the main project (see here). But the errors were never corrected, nor reported on the blue page. So this is likely to last ! It is indeed better to calculate the base 98 !

OK, seen for base 18.
I have base 98 underway, but I'll probably only take it up to index 0 >= c140 dd.

I intend to work with base 72 also (to the same size as base 98), with the intention of providing the correct .elfs as attachments for those that are incorrect in the db. That way, we can still do data harvesting via local files. I have posted the list of incorrect ones (checked up through 72^100) here. For the >=140 sequences that are incorrect in the db, I'll supply .elfs which contain at least indices 0 and 1, so that detail of study can be continued.

At a later time, I'll revisit the higher exponents for the tables for bases 18, 72, 98. Maybe someone else may be interested in the higher ends of those tables by then.
EdH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2020-09-10, 17:05   #550
garambois
 
garambois's Avatar
 
Oct 2011

33×13 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdH View Post
In case they've not been noted earlier:
Code:
29^15:i38 merges with 18528:i1

After a few checks on the data, I would note that :
Code:
29^15:i38 merges with 18528:i1
should be :
Code:
29^15:i37 merges with 18528:i0
Do you confirm that I should make this change ?
garambois is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Broken aliquot sequences fivemack FactorDB 45 2020-05-16 15:22
Broken aliquot sequences schickel FactorDB 18 2013-06-12 16:09
A new theorem about aliquot sequences garambois Aliquot Sequences 34 2012-06-10 21:53
poaching aliquot sequences... Andi47 FactorDB 21 2011-12-29 21:11
New article on aliquot sequences schickel mersennewiki 0 2008-12-30 07:07

All times are UTC. The time now is 14:59.

Tue Oct 27 14:59:32 UTC 2020 up 47 days, 12:10, 1 user, load averages: 3.44, 3.07, 2.94

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.