20190622, 14:14  #254 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
11172_{8} Posts 
Any option on server side to send a few wus to clients so to have some buffer or the only option would be to increase sieve range once again to 4k or even 8k.

20190622, 17:01  #255 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2^{4}×5×79 Posts 
Is there any way that the http://factoring.cloudygo.com could record 'relations in last 24 hours' as well as 'relations since the project started'  it would make it rather easier to see what happens when configurations change.

20190622, 20:01  #256  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
1000100010000_{2} Posts 
Quote:
As for workunit size, we'll be changing that to 8k or 10k when we move to I=15, as yield drops from 6.x on I=16 at ~200M to 2.2 on I=15 at ~300M. So far, we have sieved Q from 8M to 68M for 533M raw relations, for an average yield of 8.9. The yield on current WUs is in the mid8's. I'll run remdups shortly to see what our duplicate rate looks like. EDIT: For Q from 860M, 349.5M unique, 118.5 duplicates, 0 bad relations, total 468M relations. Duplicate rate 25%, better than the C206 that Greg ran on 16e/33 for us (that one was 792M uniq, 373M dup). I'll run it again when Q reaches 70M. Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 20190622 at 21:39 

20190623, 02:21  #257  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
10420_{8} Posts 
Quote:


20190623, 04:07  #258 
"Seth"
Apr 2019
181 Posts 
I'll try to add it to the top line and graph page tonight.

20190623, 06:57  #259 
"Seth"
Apr 2019
181 Posts 
Done
http://factoring.cloudygo.com/progre...L.c207/daily_r (which is under Charts tab) also a number on the first page. http://factoring.cloudygo.com/ Last fiddled with by SethTro on 20190623 at 06:57 
20190623, 07:27  #260  
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2^{4}×5×79 Posts 
Quote:
I think it would be even more useful to have the last24hours figure at a perclient level. Last fiddled with by fivemack on 20190623 at 07:27 

20190623, 09:14  #261 
"Carlos Pinho"
Oct 2011
Milton Keynes, UK
11172_{8} Posts 
What about associating the clients to teams?

20190623, 09:37  #262 
(loop (#_fork))
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England
2^{4}×5×79 Posts 
Some thoughts on hyperthreading and t lots
Median runtimes in various configurations, on the same hardware (fortunately I have three identical computers)
Code:
One job t32 1090s = 2180s for two Two jobs t8 2132s/2 Two jobs t16 taskset 015; 1631 1742s/2 Two jobs t16 taskset 07,1623; 815,2431 1915s/2 Last fiddled with by fivemack on 20190623 at 09:37 
20190623, 14:32  #263 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
2^{4}·3·7·13 Posts 
We've reached Q=70M, so I reran remdups:
Code:
Q Unique Dup Total 860M 349.5 118.5 468.0 870M 402.4 147.7 550.1 
20190623, 15:26  #264  
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK
2^{5}·3^{2} Posts 
Quote:
Thanks. 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Coordination thread for redoing P1 factoring  ixfd64  Lone Mersenne Hunters  50  20200610 21:01 
big job planning  henryzz  Cunningham Tables  16  20100807 05:08 
Sieving reservations and coordination  gd_barnes  No Prime Left Behind  2  20080216 03:28 
Sieved files/sieving coordination  gd_barnes  Conjectures 'R Us  32  20080122 03:09 
Special Project Planning  wblipp  ElevenSmooth  2  20040219 05:25 