mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search > Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2019-04-03, 15:19   #34
lukerichards
 
lukerichards's Avatar
 
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK

25×32 Posts
Default

This reply is beautiful, thank you. I'll digest it properly when I get home.
lukerichards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-04-04, 13:14   #35
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

10110011001112 Posts
Default

I would hazard a guess that ECPP may potentially improve more than predicted over that time period. Currently development of ECPP software is restricted by a mess of patents. Speed should improve as those patents expire. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECC_patents

Also ECPP has never been truly exposed to distributed computing. This leads to any current records taking months on one pc to finish. If the same effort was put into ecpp as nfs factorisation then much larger numbers would be proven.
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-06-05, 12:35   #36
Kebbaj
 
Kebbaj's Avatar
 
"Kebbaj Reda"
May 2018
Casablanca, Morocco

5·11 Posts
Default list 5000 ?

Can you publish on the list 5000 or even a topic that does not exist yet on the Top 20 the PRP 3 ^ 504206 + 2.
Kebbaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-06-10, 08:36   #37
lukerichards
 
lukerichards's Avatar
 
"Luke Richards"
Jan 2018
Birmingham, UK

1001000002 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kebbaj View Post
Can you publish on the list 5000 or even a topic that does not exist yet on the Top 20 the PRP 3 ^ 504206 + 2.
I'm sorry, Kebbaj, I'm not sure I understand the question.

The PRP is published on a PRP list here:

http://www.primenumbers.net/prptop/p...hp?page=3#haut

Currently ranked 542.
lukerichards is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-06-10, 11:28   #38
xilman
Bamboozled!
 
xilman's Avatar
 
"π’‰Ίπ’ŒŒπ’‡·π’†·π’€­"
May 2003
Down not across

2·32·563 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by henryzz View Post
I would hazard a guess that ECPP may potentially improve more than predicted over that time period. Currently development of ECPP software is restricted by a mess of patents. Speed should improve as those patents expire. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECC_patents

Also ECPP has never been truly exposed to distributed computing. This leads to any current records taking months on one pc to finish. If the same effort was put into ecpp as nfs factorisation then much larger numbers would be proven.
One of them expires today.
xilman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2019-06-10, 14:11   #39
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT/BST)

5×31×37 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xilman View Post
One of them expires today.
And it looks like most of the ones listed on that page are either expired or nearly so. The trouble is that there are probably more that we don't know about.
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do I get a bigger number to test ? mersenne1588 Information & Answers 6 2019-02-12 22:13
Shift Number in LL Test Kalli Hofmann Information & Answers 1 2018-01-08 12:24
how can I test a number in any prime95? Welton Information & Answers 7 2016-07-29 12:07
sequential number test Bundu Programming 20 2012-02-19 18:09
ecm_factor returning the same number as input Capone GMP-ECM 17 2007-06-17 09:19

All times are UTC. The time now is 20:46.

Sat Oct 31 20:46:11 UTC 2020 up 51 days, 17:57, 2 users, load averages: 1.69, 1.76, 1.99

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.